القائمة
Bulk resolve unresolved PR review threads on the current branch’s PR — typically after threads have been addressed manually or via /pr-threads-address
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Create and manage todo tracking documents for features, bugs, and multi-step tasks. Use when starting new work that benefits from a persistent record of decisions, progress, and context.
Set a tracking document as the source of truth for the current feature or task. Use when starting work on a feature, bug fix, or multi-step task that benefits from a persistent record of decisions, discoveries, and progress. Keeps the document updated as work proceeds.
Guidance for managing R package lifecycle according to tidyverse principles using the lifecycle package. Use when: (1) Setting up lifecycle infrastructure in a package, (2) Deprecating functions or arguments, (3) Renaming functions or arguments, (4) Superseding functions, (5) Marking functions as experimental, (6) Understanding lifecycle stages (stable, experimental, deprecated, superseded), or (7) Writing deprecation helpers for complex scenarios.
Address PR review feedback by systematically working through every unresolved PR review thread on the current branch's PR - analyze each comment, make the requested code changes (with tests where useful), commit, and optionally reply and resolve.
Build modern Shiny dashboards and applications using bslib (Bootstrap 5). Use when creating new Shiny apps, modernizing legacy apps (fluidPage, fluidRow/column, tabsetPanel, wellPanel, shinythemes), or working with bslib page layouts, grid systems, cards, value boxes, navigation, sidebars, filling layouts, theming, accordions, tooltips, popovers, toasts, or bslib inputs. Assumes familiarity with basic Shiny.
Review test code for quality, design, and completeness after implementing a feature or fixing a bug. Use when the user asks to "review my tests", "check my test quality", "are these tests good enough", "review testing", or after completing a feature implementation that includes tests. Also use when tests feel brittle, flaky, or superficial. Cross-references production code to find coverage gaps.
| name | pr-threads-resolve |
| description | Bulk resolve unresolved PR review threads on the current branch’s PR — typically after threads have been addressed manually or via /pr-threads-address |
| compatibility | Designed for Claude Code; requires gh CLI and gh-pr-review extension |
| metadata | {"author":"Barret Schloerke (@schloerke)","version":"1.0"} |
| license | MIT |
Before using this command, check if the gh pr-review extension is installed:
gh extension list | grep -q pr-review || gh extension install agynio/gh-pr-review
Every gh pr-review subcommand requires both --pr <number> and --repo <owner/repo> — do not omit either. Look the values up once at the start of the workflow and substitute the literal numbers and slugs into every later command.
Get the PR number for the current branch:
gh pr view --json number -q .number
Get the repository slug:
gh repo view --json nameWithOwner -q .nameWithOwner
Then pass the resulting values directly — e.g. --pr 42 --repo posit-dev/skills — on every subsequent gh pr-review call in this workflow (list, resolve, view, reply).
gh pr-review threads list --pr <number> --repo <owner/repo>
Filter with --unresolved or --resolved.
gh pr-review threads resolve --thread-id <PRRT_...> --pr <number> --repo <owner/repo>
gh pr-review threads unresolve --thread-id <PRRT_...> --pr <number> --repo <owner/repo>
Substitute the actual PR number and repo slug resolved in "Resolve PR context first" — the 42 / owner/repo below are placeholders.
gh pr-review threads list --pr 42 --unresolved --repo owner/repo | \
jq -r '.threads[].id' | \
xargs -I {} gh pr-review threads resolve --thread-id {} --pr 42 --repo owner/repo