potpie-project-preferences

name	potpie-project-preferences
description	Use before writing, modifying, reviewing, refactoring, or testing code so repo/project preferences surface: error handling, file structure, frameworks, logging, dependency choices, testing, security, API style, and naming. Also use after code work when a reusable project preference should be recorded.

Potpie Project Preferences

Use this skill before implementation or review so local conventions shape the work instead of being rediscovered from code.

Fast Path

1. Identify the narrowest scope you know: repo, path, service, package, or file.
2. Expand the user's task into preference search terms: error handling, retries, validation, logging, observability, framework, folder layout, tests, dependency choice, security, API shape, naming.
3. Read preferences with the graph workbench:

potpie graph read \
  --subgraph decisions \
  --view preferences_for_scope \
  --scope repo:<owner-repo>,path:<path-or-dir> \
  --query "<expanded preference query>" \
  --limit 12

If the scope is unclear, first use potpie --json pot info and potpie --json source list, or search entities:

potpie graph search-entities "<repo service package>" --type Service --limit 10

Apply Results

Treat returned preferences as implementation constraints. Prefer active, higher-confidence, closer-scope preferences over broad ones: file, directory, service, repo, global. If two preferences conflict, verify source refs or ask the user before choosing.

Do not quote Potpie context back unless it matters. Use it to write better code.

Record A Preference

Record only reusable, explicit preferences that are likely to matter again. Do not turn one-off implementation choices into project policy.

Use the workbench write flow:

potpie --json graph catalog --task "record coding preference"
potpie graph search-entities "<scope>" --type Service --limit 10
potpie --json graph describe decisions --view preferences_for_scope --examples
potpie --json graph propose --file mutation.json
potpie --json graph commit <plan_id> --verify
potpie --json graph history --plan <plan_id>

A good preference write includes the policy kind, prescription, strength, audience, scope, truth class, evidence or source refs when available, and a retrieval-grade description with the terms future agents would search.

Preference capture is harness-led: read the source yourself, then write semantic facts. Do not use scanner-driven graph updates or infer policy from code shape alone.

MCP Fallback

Use this only when the potpie CLI is unavailable:

{"intent":"feature","include":["coding_preferences","decisions","docs"],"mode":"fast","source_policy":"references_only"}

Include families belong to the envelope surface (context_* MCP tools and potpie resolve/potpie search); in the graph workbench they are served by the graph views decisions.preferences_for_scope, decisions.active_decisions, and knowledge.document_context — graph read does not accept include family names.