| name | pw-accessibility-auditor |
| description | Integrates automated accessibility checks into Playwright tests using axe-core. Use when an SDET says "add a11y checks", "run axe on this page", "screen for selected WCAG rules", or "triage these accessibility violations". Produces @axe-core/playwright-based tests and evidence mapped to a supplied accessibility policy; it never determines WCAG compliance, and automated checks cover only a fraction. |
| license | MIT |
| metadata | {"author":"TheTestingAcademy","pack":"playwright","version":"1.0.0"} |
PW Accessibility Auditor
You wire in automated a11y checks the engineer must run and supplement with
manual testing — axe catches only a fraction of issues, never all of them.
When to use
- A page/component needs automated accessibility coverage.
- Someone wants to triage or gate on axe violations.
- Someone says "add a11y checks", "map these to WCAG".
Workflow
- Integrate
@axe-core/playwright — run AxeBuilder after the page reaches a
stable state (web-first assertion first), scanning the real rendered DOM.
- Confirm the policy and versions — record the product's approved accessibility
standard/conformance target plus installed axe and rule-set versions. Select only
axe tags supported by that version and mapped by the supplied policy; never silently
default to a WCAG edition or conformance level.
- Scope the scan — use
.include()/.exclude() for the approved component and
documented third-party exclusions. Record every exclusion and its owner.
- Triage without inventing a gate — preserve every violation and its axe impact.
Apply blocking impacts or rule IDs only from the approved policy; impact labels do
not by themselves establish WCAG conformance or permission to defer an issue.
- Map each violation to WCAG — axe returns
tags and helpUrl; surface the
success criterion (e.g. 1.4.3 contrast, 4.1.2 name/role/value) so it's actionable.
- Flag the coverage gap — remind that keyboard, focus order, screen-reader, and
cognitive checks need a human; automation is the floor, not the ceiling.
- HUMAN REVIEW GATE (mandatory). Require the accessibility owner to confirm the
target standard, axe tags/version, exclusions, blocking policy, manual coverage,
and publication wording before enabling a CI gate or making a conformance statement.
Output shape
import { test, expect } from '@playwright/test';
import AxeBuilder from '@axe-core/playwright';
import { accessibilityPolicy, approvedPage } from './approved-accessibility-policy';
test('approved page satisfies the configured automated gate', async ({ page }) => {
await page.goto(approvedPage.path);
await expect(page.getByRole('heading', { name: approvedPage.heading })).toBeVisible();
const results = await new AxeBuilder({ page })
.withTags(accessibilityPolicy.axeTags)
.analyze();
const evidence = accessibilityPolicy.redactFindings(results.violations);
await test.info().attach('axe-violations', {
body: Buffer.from(JSON.stringify(evidence, null, 2)),
contentType: 'application/json',
});
const blocking = results.violations.(
accessibilityPolicy..(violation.));
(blocking, .(blocking, , )).([]);
});
Treat the imported policy/page module as a required, human-approved project input. It
must record the target standard, installed axe/rule-set version, tags, exclusions,
blocking rules, owners, manual-test obligations, and a fail-closed redactFindings
implementation. Classify the attached evidence and approve its audience, access,
retention, and deletion before CI publication; withhold it if safe redaction fails.
Guardrails
- Automated axe checks are the floor — this is a draft the engineer must run and
back with manual keyboard/screen-reader testing; never claim WCAG compliance or
"fully accessible" from automated results.
- Never assume a selector/testid exists; scan the real rendered DOM after it settles.
- Don't fabricate WCAG criteria — use the
tags/helpUrl axe actually returns.
- Never hardcode a WCAG edition, tags, exclusions, impact threshold, or rule gate without
the supplied policy and installed axe-version support. Record every non-blocking finding.
- Treat DOM snippets and related evidence as potentially sensitive; redact them and apply
approved access and retention controls before attaching or publishing artifacts.
- Do not enable the CI gate or publish a conformance statement before the human review gate.