audit

name

audit

description

Scan this Obsidian vault for content that's drifted from the conventions in `CLAUDE.md` (status↔folder drift, missing required fields, naming violations, stale active items, frontmatter health issues, orphan wikilinks). Produces a categorized report and offers per-finding fix actions — never auto-bulk-fixes. Use this skill whenever the user says any of: "audit the vault", "audit", "what's broken", "check for issues", "validate the vault", "run a checkup", "find inconsistencies", "any drift?", "lint the vault", "fix orphan links", "check schema", "is everything in order", "sanity check the vault", "tidy up", or any similar request for a vault-wide health check. The actual scanning is bundled in `scripts/audit.py` (deterministic, fast, no side effects); this skill formats its output and walks through fixes one at a time.

Audit the vault

Scan this Obsidian vault for drift from the CLAUDE.md schema. The scanning is bundled in scripts/audit.py — a read-only Python script that walks the vault, parses frontmatter, runs each check, and prints a structured JSON report. This skill's job is to call the script, format the output for the conversation, and walk through fixes interactively when the user wants them.

For per-category details (what each check looks for, how to fix it, severity), read references/categories.md once at the start of a session that uses this skill. Don't re-read on every invocation.

Workflow

1. Determine scope

Parse the user's request:

• "audit the vault" / no args → full scan
• "audit projects/" / "check the wiki" → pass --scope <folder>
• "any orphan links?" / "fix naming" → pass --category <name>
  • Categories: drift, fields, naming, stale, frontmatter, wikilinks

2. Run the scan

.claude/skills/audit/scripts/audit.py [--scope <folder>] [--category <name>]

The script prints a JSON object:

{
  "summary": {"drift": 2, "fields": 0, "naming": 1, "stale": 3, ...},
  "findings": [
    {
      "category": "drift",
      "severity": "error",
      "file": "projects/Project - X.md",
      "rule": "status-folder-mismatch",
      "detail": "File has status: archived but is in projects/ (expected archives/<year>/projects/)",
      "fix": {"kind": "invoke-skill", "skill": "archive", "args" 
    
    ...
  

3. Format the report

Print a categorized summary in the conversation. Use a tight layout:

Audit report (15 findings across 4 categories):

drift (2 errors)
  • projects/Project - Foo.md — status: archived but in projects/ → invoke `/archive` to relocate
  • archives/2025/projects/Project - Bar.md — status: active but in archives/ → invoke `/archive unarchive`

fields (1 warning)
  • goals/Goal - Baz.md — missing required: target_completion_date

naming (3 errors)
  • projects/foo.md — filename doesn't match `Project - <Human Name>.md`
  ...

One line per finding, file path first, rule short-name, then a brief "how to fix" hint. Group by category. Severity order: error first, then warning, then info. Don't dump every detail — the script's JSON has the full context if the user wants to dig in.

If there are zero findings: "Vault is clean — no drift detected." End.

4. Offer per-finding fix actions (only if user asks)

If the user says "fix them" / "walk me through them" / "let's clean up" after seeing the report, iterate through findings whose fix.kind is set, asking the user via AskUserQuestion for each:

• invoke-skill: "Run the suggested skill for this finding?" → yes invokes the named skill via the Skill tool with the recorded args.
• edit-frontmatter: "Apply the suggested frontmatter edit?" → yes uses Edit on the file.
• rename: "Rename to the suggested filename?" → yes uses obsidian rename.
• manual: no fix offered — surface to the user and move on.

Never apply a fix without explicit per-finding confirmation. Even when the user said "fix them all", ask per finding — the user has been burned by silent bulk operations elsewhere and explicitly trusts the per-finding-confirm pattern.

If the user wants to skip the interactive fixes: "Run again with --fix later, or invoke individual skills (/archive, /create-page) as needed." End.

5. Close

One short summary: "Audit done — 15 findings reported, 3 fixed." Or, if no fix loop: "Audit done — 15 findings reported."

Rules

• Read-only by default. The script never mutates. Fix actions happen through this skill orchestrating Edit / Skill calls based on the script's recommendations — not through the script itself.
• One fix per AskUserQuestion. Don't batch fixes into multi-select questions. The user needs to see each one in context to decide responsibly.
• The script is the source of truth for what's "wrong". Don't re-implement checks in Claude. If a check needs to change, update the script (scripts/audit.py) and references/categories.md. Drift between the two breaks the skill.
• Skip body wikilinks for v1. The script checks frontmatter wikilinks for orphans (the areas, goals etc. fields). Body wikilinks are out of scope — Obsidian's own "Show unresolved links" view handles those. If the user explicitly asks "scan body links too", decline and suggest the native view.
• Stale active items are flagged, not auto-archived. A past due_date doesn't mean a Project should be archived — it might just be late. Surface the finding and let the user decide (often the right fix is pushing the date forward, not archiving).