Skip to main content

aqe-plan-quality

Create risk-based quality and test plans for Agentic QE changes. Use when scoping a feature, translating requirements into verification work, selecting QE specialties, assessing testability, or deciding which `.claude/agents/v3/qe-*.md` capabilities should inform a task. Do not use merely to execute an already-defined test command.

معلومات المصدر

المستودع
proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe
آخر نشاط في المصدر
٢٣ يوليو ٢٠٢٦ في ١٥:٠١
لغة SKILL.md المكتشفة
الإنجليزية
النجوم
٤٩٤
التفرعات
٩٨

خيارات التثبيت

يُحدَّد Prompt الذي يراجع المصدر أولًا بشكل افتراضي. يمكنك التبديل إلى أمر مباشر أو تنزيل نسخة محلية.

مراجعة ملفات المصدر

اقرأ SKILL.md وأي ملفات مرافقة يعرضها SkillsMP قبل أن تقرر التثبيت.

مستكشف الملفات
3 ملفات

عرض SKILL.md

SKILL.md
تعليمات المصدر · معاينة للقراءة فقط
name
aqe-plan-quality
description
Create risk-based quality and test plans for Agentic QE changes. Use when scoping a feature, translating requirements into verification work, selecting QE specialties, assessing testability, or deciding which `.claude/agents/v3/qe-*.md` capabilities should inform a task. Do not use merely to execute an already-defined test command.
# Plan AQE Quality 1. Read `AGENTS.md`, the requested change, and the affected public boundaries. 2. Inspect the closest implementation and tests before proposing work. 3. Classify the risk domains using [references/qe-routing.md](references/qe-routing.md). 4. Select only the QE specialties needed. Treat Claude agent definitions as domain references; do not copy their Claude-only `Task`, `SendMessage`, or hook syntax into Codex actions. 5. Produce a plan that covers: - observable requirements and acceptance criteria; - affected boundaries, dependencies, and failure modes; - durable tests first, then implementation-coupled tests; - security, performance, accessibility, contract, or resilience checks when triggered by the change; - the narrowest repository verification commands. 6. Flag assumptions, unavailable environments, destructive operations, and decisions requiring human approval. Prefer evidence from repository code and configuration over generic test checklists. Keep the selected fleet small and explain each specialty’s purpose.
عرض على GitHub