generate-release-notes

redis/redis-py

Generate a redis-py GitHub release-notes draft and save it as a Markdown file. Collects the merged PRs/commits since the previous release, maps each commit to its PR labels, categorizes them into the project's release sections (Breaking Changes, Deprecations, Experimental Features, New Features, Bug Fixes, Maintenance) using the skill's pr-labels-guide, infers a category for unlabeled PRs, and assembles the notes with an optional Highlights section and a contributors footer. Trigger this skill whenever the user says "release notes", "create release notes", "generate release notes", "draft release notes", "prepare release notes", "changelog", or asks for the release notes/changelog of a specific version or branch (e.g. "release notes for 8.0", "generate release notes for the 8.0 branch", "what changed since the last release"). A phrase like "release notes for 8.0" means: use branch `8.0` as the release-branch input. Also use when asked to summarize what changed since the last tag.

2026-07-0813.6k

maintainer-review

redis/redis-py

Review a GitHub issue or pull request URL as a redis-py maintainer, with a staged assessment of whether the claim is real, practically important, already solvable with supported functionality, correctly scoped, better served by another design, and worth maintainer and contributor effort. Use when assessing issue validity or severity, deciding whether an issue should be prioritized or closed, determining whether a requested feature represents an unmet need rather than a discoverability or usage gap, judging whether a PR is worth bringing to mergeable quality, comparing open PRs or alternative designs, separating code quality from repository readiness, or drafting a concise maintainer assessment. When closure, additional evidence, or code changes should be requested, also produce a polite, concise, complete, copy-paste-ready maintainer comment.

2026-07-0813.6k

pr-draft-summary

redis/redis-py

Produce PR-ready output for redis-py — a one-line commit message and a copy-pasteable Markdown PR description (Change summary + Test coverage, 5–6 paragraphs) covering all staged changes plus the commits already on the current branch. Trigger whenever the user's message mentions any of these keywords or phrases: "PR", "pr", "PR description", "PR draft", "pull request", "the PR block", "commit msg", "commit message", or otherwise asks for a commit message or PR write-up for their local changes.

2026-07-0813.6k

generate-release-notes

redis/redis-py

Generate a redis-py GitHub release-notes draft and save it as a Markdown file. Collects the merged PRs/commits since the previous release, maps each commit to its PR labels, categorizes them into the project's release sections (Breaking Changes, Deprecations, Experimental Features, New Features, Bug Fixes, Maintenance) using the skill's pr-labels-guide, infers a category for unlabeled PRs, and assembles the notes with an optional Highlights section and a contributors footer. Trigger this skill whenever the user says "release notes", "create release notes", "generate release notes", "draft release notes", "prepare release notes", "changelog", or asks for the release notes/changelog of a specific version or branch (e.g. "release notes for 8.0", "generate release notes for the 8.0 branch", "what changed since the last release"). A phrase like "release notes for 8.0" means: use branch `8.0` as the release-branch input. Also use when asked to summarize what changed since the last tag.

2026-07-0813.6k

maintainer-review

redis/redis-py

Review a GitHub issue or pull request URL as a redis-py maintainer, with a staged assessment of whether the claim is real, practically important, already solvable with supported functionality, correctly scoped, better served by another design, and worth maintainer and contributor effort. Use when assessing issue validity or severity, deciding whether an issue should be prioritized or closed, determining whether a requested feature represents an unmet need rather than a discoverability or usage gap, judging whether a PR is worth bringing to mergeable quality, comparing open PRs or alternative designs, separating code quality from repository readiness, or drafting a concise maintainer assessment. When closure, additional evidence, or code changes should be requested, also produce a polite, concise, complete, copy-paste-ready maintainer comment.

2026-07-0813.6k

pr-draft-summary

المزيد من هذا المستودع

المزيد من هذا المستودع