Skip to main content

code-size

Enforce complexity and size limits on Swift code with SwiftLint threshold rules — cyclomatic complexity, function/type/file length, parameter count — adopted via a violations baseline so existing code never blocks. Use when agent-written code needs deterministic size constraints.

الانتقال إلى التثبيت

معلومات المصدر

المستودع
rshankras/claude-code-apple-skills
آخر نشاط في المصدر
٢٤ يوليو ٢٠٢٦ في ٠٧:٥٥
لغة SKILL.md المكتشفة
الإنجليزية
النجوم
٧٥٣
التفرعات
٧١

خيارات التثبيت

يُحدَّد Prompt الذي يراجع المصدر أولًا بشكل افتراضي. يمكنك التبديل إلى أمر مباشر أو تنزيل نسخة محلية.

مراجعة ملفات المصدر

اقرأ SKILL.md وأي ملفات مرافقة يعرضها SkillsMP قبل أن تقرر التثبيت.

مستكشف الملفات
2 ملفات

عرض SKILL.md

SKILL.md
تعليمات المصدر · معاينة للقراءة فقط
name
code-size
description
Enforce complexity and size limits on Swift code with SwiftLint threshold rules — cyclomatic complexity, function/type/file length, parameter count — adopted via a violations baseline so existing code never blocks. Use when agent-written code needs deterministic size constraints.
allowed-tools
["Read","Write","Edit","Glob","Grep","Bash"]
last_verified
2026-07-24T00:00:00.000Z
review_by
2027-07-01T00:00:00.000Z
# Code Size & Complexity Limits Complexity is the strongest single predictor of defect density, and code written *by agents* balloons fastest — an agent under pressure adds one more branch to an existing function far more readily than it extracts a new one. These five SwiftLint threshold rules are the deterministic cap: they keep functions small enough that tests can actually cover their branches, and they keep agents from wrangling with their own tangles. ## When This Skill Activates Use this skill when: - Setting up quality gates for a project where agents write most of the code - A review keeps flagging "this function is too long/branchy" by hand - Functions have grown past what their tests plausibly cover - Adopting the deterministic gauntlet (see `testing/fitness-functions/`) ## The Rules The fragment at `rules/swiftlint.yml` configures five built-in SwiftLint rules (all enabled by default in SwiftLint — this fragment sets the thresholds): | Rule | Warning | Error | What it caps | |---|---|---|---| | `cyclomatic_complexity` | 10 | 20 | Independent paths through one function | | `function_body_length` | 50 | 100 | Lines per function body | | `type_body_length` | 300 | 500 | Lines per type body | | `file_length` | 500 | 1000 | Lines per file | | `function_parameter_count` | 5 | 8 | Parameters per function | Merge the fragment into the project's `.swiftlint.yml` (alongside any `opt_in_rules`/`custom_rules` fragments already adopted). ## Brownfield Adoption: Baseline, Never Mass-Refactor Turning these rules on in an existing codebase must not trigger a refactoring spree — bulk rewrites to satisfy a linter are how working code gets broken. Freeze today's violations and gate only *new* ones: ```bash # One-time: record existing violations (SwiftLint 0.55+) swiftlint lint --write-baseline .swiftlint-baseline.json # The gate from then on — fails only on NEW violations swiftlint lint --strict --baseline .swiftlint-baseline.json ``` Commit `.swiftlint-baseline.json`. Shrink it opportunistically: when touching a baselined function for other reasons, fix its violation and regenerate the baseline in the same commit. **Fallback for older SwiftLint** (before 0.55, no baseline support): record the violation count instead — ```bash swiftlint lint --quiet | wc -l > .swiftlint-count # Gate: current count must not exceed the committed count ``` ## When a Rule Fires The fix is structural, not suppressive: - `cyclomatic_complexity` / `function_body_length` → extract the branches into named functions, or replace the branch ladder with a table/enum dispatch - `type_body_length` / `file_length` → split by responsibility (extensions in separate files count separately) - `function_parameter_count` → introduce a parameter struct `// swiftlint:disable` is not a fix. The rare legitimate exemption (a generated file, a big-but-flat data table) belongs in `.swiftlint.yml`'s `excluded:` list with a comment — visible in one place, not scattered through source. ## Common Pitfalls | Pitfall | Problem | Solution | |---------|---------|----------| | Enabling without a baseline | Day-one wall of violations, gate ignored | `--write-baseline` first, gate on new only | | Mass-refactoring to satisfy thresholds | Working code broken for a number | Freeze old violations; fix opportunistically | | Inline `swiftlint:disable` comments | Exemptions scattered and invisible | `excluded:` list in config, with reasons | | Thresholds loosened per-project | Cap quietly stops capping | Change thresholds only with a written reason | ## References - `testing/fitness-functions/` — set/count invariants a per-line rule can't express - `testing/coverage-ratchet/` — the coverage half of the metrics gauntlet - `ios/coding-best-practices/` — iOS-specific lint fragment (style/API rules) - `generators/ci-cd-setup/` — base `.swiftlint.yml` template these fragments merge into
عرض على GitHub