| name | create-request |
| description | Route create-request using exact migration registry [{"unit":"create-request/default","routing":{"positive_triggers":["Create a date-prefixed execution request from the approved technical specification.","Scan incomplete request tickets and show the stale work dashboard.","Update this request ticket from implementation evidence and verify its acceptance criteria."],"negative_boundaries":["Analyze the feature-wide problem and write prioritized requirements.","Design the system architecture, risks, work breakdown, and testing strategy.","Implement the approved request and modify production code."]}}]. |
Manage Request Tickets
Treat request tickets as execution units, not feature requirements. Keep one concern
layer per ticket, no more than eight acceptance criteria, and an estimate small enough
for roughly three days of work.
Select a mode
- Create: the user asks for a new ticket and does not identify an existing request.
- Update: the user identifies one request or asks to sync the current request.
- Update all: the user explicitly asks for a batch sync. Never infer this mutation.
- Status: the user asks for a dashboard, incomplete work, or stale requests; this mode is read-only.
- Verify AC: independent AC verification modifies only one request and is incompatible
with update all.
The deterministic request helper in this installed skill is
the only resolver. Its resolver mode accepts an optional feature key or canonical
repository-relative path; its scan mode returns the incomplete-work dashboard.
Resolve or scan before reading or writing request documents.
Read references/request-format.md before every create
or update. It owns both the ticket format and the durable closure transaction.
Use the helper's canonical paths and active-request list. Never guess after a null or
ambiguous resolution. If both a feature key and path are supplied, they must resolve
to the same slug. The helper is query-only and never creates directories or files.
Create
- Resolution precedence is explicit input, a feature matching a supported branch
prefix, one uniquely changed feature, and finally one available feature directory.
- Read the parent tech spec and, when present, requirements document. Read
references/request-format.md before rendering.
- Derive a single-task scope, related files, dependencies, and evidence-oriented ACs.
If the task mixes layers, spans independent areas, exceeds eight ACs, or is larger
than about three days, propose focused sibling tickets before writing.
- Record the current HEAD commit identifier as
Implementation Base SHA. Name the
file YYYY-MM-DD-kebab-case-title.md and refuse collisions instead of overwriting.
- Create only after clear user intent to create a local ticket. Preserve bidirectional
links with the parent tech spec and requirements document when they exist.
Update one
- Resolve exactly one request. Multiple active requests require the user to choose.
- Read the entire request, its implementation base, related files, and relevant
repository guidance. Snapshot the current non-request worktree state before
evaluating progress.
- Update checkboxes and progress only from concrete implementation or test evidence.
Normalize
In Development and In Dev to In Progress; normalize Done to
Completed only when reading legacy tickets.
- Without independent AC verification, the highest writable state is
Candidate Complete. Partial or missing evidence stays In Progress.
- Preserve user-authored sections and unrelated edits. Re-run the resolver before
writing and refuse the edit if the target or non-request subject drifted.
For independent AC verification, start a fresh, isolated, read-only Codex subagent.
Its bounded context contains only the raw AC list, related paths, repository root,
implementation base, and subject snapshot.
Bound it to 60 seconds. Require one structured result per AC with Complete,
Partial, Not Found, or Inconclusive; High, Medium, or Low confidence; and
repo-relative file:line evidence for every Complete. Timeout, cancellation,
unavailability, malformed output, missing evidence, or subject drift makes affected
ACs inconclusive and prevents Completed.
All-Complete, High-confidence verification may propose Completed, but never write
that transition directly. The bundled runtime owns closure preparation, the durable
application of exact proposed bytes, and finalization after ordinary docs review. Follow the byte and evidence
contract in the reference. If apply leaves a journal with unknown bytes, stop for an
explicit operator choice before invoking closure recover restore-prior|abandon;
bind that choice to the operator-inspected expected_current_sha256 and never choose
recovery automatically. Any
missing gate, stale subject, failed AC/check, tampered ref, or restart mismatch stops
at Candidate Complete.
Update all
The helper's incomplete-work dashboard is the batch starting point. Each ticket stays
independent. A batch may mark
evidenced ACs and move Pending to In Progress or Candidate Complete; it must
never write Completed, perform independent AC verification, or treat docs-only commits as
implementation evidence. Keep parse failures as per-file errors and continue with
unrelated valid tickets. Report before/after status and AC counts for every file.
Status
Use the scan JSON without editing files. Group active requests in this order:
In Progress, Candidate Complete, Pending/unknown, then Design/Proposed.
Sort each group by P0, P1, P2, unknown priority, then oldest creation date. Show AC
counts, paths, parse errors, requests pending for more than 30 days, and the archived
count.
Completion discipline
After any write, follow the target repository's documentation review and verification
rules. A ticket's status is not evidence that its implementation or the current
worktree passed a gate. Never modify Git metadata, stage, commit, push, or publish as
an implied part of request management.
{
"positive_triggers": [
"Create a date-prefixed execution request from the approved technical specification.",
"Scan incomplete request tickets and show the stale work dashboard.",
"Update this request ticket from implementation evidence and verify its acceptance criteria."
],
"negative_boundaries": [
"Analyze the feature-wide problem and write prioritized requirements.",
"Design the system architecture, risks, work breakdown, and testing strategy.",
"Implement the approved request and modify production code."
]
}