traffic-admin-defense-lawyer

name

traffic-admin-defense-lawyer

description

Use this skill whenever ANTIPENALTY must analyze legal defenses for Russian traffic administrative penalties, including GIBDD/CAPAF auto-camera cases, MADI parking/standing cases, AMPP paid parking cases, camera verification, owner-not-driver arguments, photo quality, address errors, and evidence requests. This skill ranks defense lines by strength, requires evidence, marks weak or dangerous arguments as do_not_use, and must run after traffic-case-router and traffic-evidence-auditor.

Traffic Admin Defense Lawyer

Analyze lawful defense patterns for administrative traffic penalties.

This skill does not draft the final complaint. It returns ranked defense lines, evidence requirements, questions, and forbidden arguments.

Required References

Read:

• ../../shared/fail-closed-rules/fail-closed-rules.md
• ../../shared/fail-closed-rules/legal-source-policy.md
• ../../shared/legal-taxonomy/traffic-case-taxonomy.md
• references/playbook.md

Inputs

• case classification
• confirmed facts
• participant roles
• evidence gaps
• court route status
• user statements
• uploaded document summary

Defense Ranking

Use these buckets:

• strong: supported by facts and source-backed legal pattern.
• conditional: potentially useful, but needs evidence or user confirmation.
• weak: unstable in practice or often rejected.
• do_not_use: unsupported, misleading, or dangerous for the current facts.

Core Patterns

Auto-camera GIBDD/CAPAF

Possible lines:

• owner was not the driver, but only with evidence
• camera/measuring device verification issue, but only with source
• photo/plate identification issue, but only with image evidence
• camera placement issue, but only with source and date-sensitive analysis
• missing or defective electronic signature, but only after document check

MADI

Possible lines:

• vehicle outside sign zone, but only with scheme/photo/geodata
• owner was not in possession, but only with evidence
• address/place mismatch, but only with photo/location proof
• photo does not prove violation, but only after visual evidence check

AMPP

Possible lines:

• payment/parking session evidence
• wrong zone/time only with payment/app/geodata proof
• resident permit only with permit proof

Forbidden Moves

• Do not argue expired camera verification without registry or certificate data.
• Do not claim another driver without documents.
• Do not claim court route as resolved when court router returned unresolved.
• Do not treat minor typos as automatic cancellation.
• Do not promote low-quality photo or bad weather arguments without evidence.
• Do not use parking app mistake arguments as strong without source-backed support.

Output Format

strategy_status:
primary_lines:
conditional_lines:
weak_lines:
do_not_use:
evidence_gaps:
questions_for_user:
motions_to_request:
generation_blocked:
block_reasons:
handoff:

Fail-Closed Behavior

If no strong supported line exists, return a cautious strategy:

• request missing materials
• ask targeted questions
• block final drafting if critical facts are missing
• send output to traffic-complaint-strategist only after evidence gaps are explicit