claude-toolbox

Code review of current git changes with an expert senior-engineer lens. Detects SOLID violations, security risks, and proposes actionable improvements. Use when performing code reviews.

Code review of current git changes with an expert senior-engineer lens. Detects SOLID violations, security risks, and proposes actionable improvements. Use when performing code reviews.

Use in pre-implementation (idea-to-design) stages to understand spec/requirements and create a correct implementation plan before writing actual code. Turns ideas into a fully-formed PRD/design/specification and implementation-plan. Creates design docs and task lists in docs/wip/.

Use in pre-implementation (idea-to-design) stages to understand spec/requirements and create a correct implementation plan before writing actual code. Turns ideas into a fully-formed PRD/design/specification and implementation-plan. Creates design docs and task lists in docs/wip/.

Apply Chain-of-Verification (CoVe) prompting to improve response accuracy through self-verification. Use when complex questions require fact-checking, technical accuracy, or multi-step reasoning.

TRIGGER when: adding or upgrading any dependency — library, SDK, framework, API, IaC API version (K8s/Terraform/Helm), CRD, or container image. Use BEFORE writing the call. Forces context7/capy lookup instead of guessing.

Compare two versions of a skill's instructions to detect degradations and complexity increases. TRIGGER when: user asks to diff, compare, or review changes to a skill's markdown instructions. Asymmetric check — only regressions count. Additions, clarifications, and strengthenings are not degradations. Compares HEAD → working tree by default. Walks the full reachable file set from SKILL.md via markdown links. Produces a report file under docs/reviews/diff-skill/ and an inline summary.

After implementing a new feature or fixing a bug, make sure to document the changes. Use when writing documentation, after finishing the implementation phase for a feature or a bug-fix.

TRIGGER when: user asks to implement, fix, build, or work on something — whether from a docs/wip plan OR a standalone task (bug fix, GitHub issue, one-off change). Examples: "work on task 1", "fix this bug", "implement feature X from the issue". Provides structured execution with profile detection, dependency handling, review checkpoints.

Compare and merge two design docs for the same feature into a single source of truth. Use when you have competing or complementary design/implementation docs (e.g. from separate design runs) that need reconciling into one unified document.

Review design, implementation, and task documents produced by design. Evaluates document quality, internal consistency, and technical soundness. Use after design completes and before starting implement.

Use after implementing tasks or mid-feature to verify code matches design docs and ensure they are in sync. Detects spec deviations, missing implementations, doc inconsistencies, and outdated docs in design and implementation documentation.

Guidelines describing how to test the code. Use whenever writing new or updating existing code, for example after implementing a new feature or fixing a bug.

Apply Chain-of-Verification (CoVe) prompting to improve response accuracy through self-verification. Use when complex questions require fact-checking, technical accuracy, or multi-step reasoning.

TRIGGER when: adding or upgrading any dependency — library, SDK, framework, API, IaC API version (K8s/Terraform/Helm), CRD, or container image. Use BEFORE writing the call. Forces context7/capy lookup instead of guessing.

Compare two versions of a skill's instructions to detect degradations and complexity increases. TRIGGER when: user asks to diff, compare, or review changes to a skill's markdown instructions. Asymmetric check — only regressions count. Additions, clarifications, and strengthenings are not degradations. Compares HEAD → working tree by default. Walks the full reachable file set from SKILL.md via markdown links. Produces a report file under docs/reviews/diff-skill/ and an inline summary.

After implementing a new feature or fixing a bug, make sure to document the changes. Use when writing documentation, after finishing the implementation phase for a feature or a bug-fix.

TRIGGER when: user asks to implement, fix, build, or work on something — whether from a docs/wip plan OR a standalone task (bug fix, GitHub issue, one-off change). Examples: "work on task 1", "fix this bug", "implement feature X from the issue". Provides structured execution with profile detection, dependency handling, review checkpoints.

Compare and merge two design docs for the same feature into a single source of truth. Use when you have competing or complementary design/implementation docs (e.g. from separate design runs) that need reconciling into one unified document.

Review design, implementation, and task documents produced by design. Evaluates document quality, internal consistency, and technical soundness. Use after design completes and before starting implement.

Use after implementing tasks or mid-feature to verify code matches design docs and ensure they are in sync. Detects spec deviations, missing implementations, doc inconsistencies, and outdated docs in design and implementation documentation.

Guidelines describing how to test the code. Use whenever writing new or updating existing code, for example after implementing a new feature or fixing a bug.

A test skill

Reviews tool configurations for correctness.

Reviews tool configurations for correctness.

An example skill for testing diff-skill evaluation.

An example skill for testing diff-skill evaluation.

Reviews tool configurations for correctness.

Reviews tool configurations for correctness.

An example skill for testing diff-skill evaluation.

An example skill for testing diff-skill evaluation.