| name | compliance-framework |
| description | Implement compliance requirements (SOC2, GDPR, HIPAA). Design architecture for regulations. Map technical controls to compliance requirements. Use when building regulated systems. |
Compliance Framework
Design systems that meet regulatory requirements and establish continuous compliance monitoring.
Context
You are implementing compliance for regulated systems. Map regulations to technical controls. Design for audit readiness. Read requirements, existing controls, certification timelines.
Domain Context
Based on compliance frameworks and regulatory standards:
- SOC2: Security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality. Requires audit trail, access control, encryption.
- GDPR: Protects EU citizens' personal data. Requires consent, data portability, right-to-be-forgotten, breach notification.
- HIPAA: Health information privacy (US). Requires encryption, audit logs, access controls, business associate agreements.
- PCI DSS: Payment card data protection. Requires segmentation, encryption, monitoring, vendor management.
Instructions
-
Identify Applicable Standards: Which regulations apply? GDPR (EU users)? HIPAA (health data)? SOC2 (enterprise customers)? PCI DSS (payment processing)?
-
Map Controls to Architecture: For each regulation, what technical controls needed? GDPR: encryption at rest/transit, audit logs, consent tracking. HIPAA: role-based access, encrypted backups, breach detection.
-
Design for Audit: Audit logs must be immutable, encrypted, sent to separate system. Log all data access, configuration changes, admin actions. Retention per regulation (GDPR: 3 years minimum).
-
Build Operational Processes: Change management: approve all changes, test in staging, audit trail. Incident response: detect, contain, notify (GDPR: 72 hours). Annual training on compliance.
-
Plan for Verification: Audit readiness: document controls, gather evidence. Penetration testing annually. Vulnerability scanning continuous. Third-party assessments (SOC2, HIPAA).
Anti-Patterns
- Compliance as Afterthought: Build system, then add compliance controls. Result: hard to retrofit, costly. Guard: Design for compliance from start; embed controls in architecture.
- Over-Compliance: Implement controls for regulations you don't need. Result: cost, complexity. Guard: Identify exact requirements; implement only what's needed.
- No Automation: Manual evidence gathering for audits. Result: slow, error-prone. Guard: Automate log collection, evidence gathering, control testing.
- Forgotten After Certification: Achieve compliance, then relax. Result: drift, recertification failure. Guard: Continuous monitoring; treat compliance as ongoing, not one-time.
Further Reading
- SOC2 Compliance — security audit framework for service providers
- GDPR Compliance — European data protection regulation
- HIPAA Security Rule — health information protection (US)
- Compliance is Not Security by James Ranall — compliance mindset and culture
