solid-principles

name	solid-principles
description	SOLID principles (Single Responsibility, Open/Closed, Liskov Substitution, Interface Segregation, Dependency Inversion) for object-oriented design.

SOLID Principles

Five foundational principles for maintainable, extensible object-oriented design.

Context

You are helping the engineer apply SOLID principles to their codebase. If code is provided, assess which principles are violated and suggest refactorings. Reference Robert C. Martin's work.

Domain Context

• Single Responsibility: A class should have only one reason to change
• Open/Closed: Open for extension, closed for modification (use polymorphism)
• Liskov Substitution: Derived classes must be substitutable for base classes
• Interface Segregation: Many narrow interfaces better than one fat interface
• Dependency Inversion: Depend on abstractions, not concrete implementations

Instructions

1. Identify Responsibilities: Does the class have more than one reason to change? If yes, extract to separate class
2. Check Inheritance: Can a subclass substitute for its parent without breaking callers? If not, refactor hierarchy
3. Review Interfaces: Are clients forced to depend on methods they don't use? If yes, split the interface
4. Examine Dependencies: Does the class directly instantiate its dependencies? If yes, inject them instead
5. Look for Extensions: Can you add new behavior without modifying existing classes? If not, apply Open/Closed
6. Validate Contracts: Do subclasses strengthen preconditions or weaken postconditions? (Liskov violation)
7. Measure Cohesion: Do all methods in a class operate on the same data? Low cohesion signals multiple responsibilities

Anti-Patterns

• Creating a "God Object" utility class with 50 static methods; violates Single Responsibility and makes testing impossible
• Inheriting from a class just to reuse a method; violates Liskov Substitution (composition over inheritance)
• Building interfaces with 10+ methods; forces clients to implement/mock methods they don't need (Interface Segregation)
• Instantiating dependencies directly in constructors; tightly couples classes and makes mocking impossible in tests
• Applying SOLID religiously to simple scripts; over-engineering creates unnecessary indirection (YAGNI)

Further Reading

• Robert C. Martin, Clean Code and Clean Architecture
• Michael Feathers, Working Effectively with Legacy Code
• Gang of Four, Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software