| name | sci-polish |
| description | Two-stage academic paper polishing skill. Stage A reduces AI detection traces (targeting GPTZero, Turnitin, Originality.ai). Stage B performs 8-dimension quality improvement (grammar, tone, coherence, conciseness, terminology, structure, argument clarity, journal compliance). Use whenever the user asks to polish, proofread, humanize, reduce AI rate, improve writing quality, or prepare a paper for submission.
|
| author | Shuo Zhao |
| license | MIT |
| copyright | © 2026 Shuo Zhao. All rights reserved. |
| triggers | ["润色论文","polish paper","reduce AI detection","降AI率","de-AI","humanize paper","academic polish","论文润色","学术改写","improve writing","proofread","降低AI率","论文降重","paper polishing","rewrite academic"] |
Sci-Polish — Academic Paper Polishing & De-AI
Two-stage academic paper polishing: AI trace reduction + 8-dimension quality improvement.
Hard Rules (NEVER violate)
- NEVER modify: LaTeX commands, math environments (
$...$, \[...\], equation, align, etc.), \cite{}, \ref{}, \label{}, algorithm blocks, code listings, figure/table environments (only caption text is editable)
- NEVER fabricate: data, citations, experimental results, baselines, metrics, author names
- NEVER remove: author's technical claims without explicit permission
- NEVER introduce: Tier 1 AI words (see
references/word-choice-anti-ai.md) during Phase B edits
- Mark as
[PENDING VERIFICATION]: any claim you cannot verify from the text
- Preserve meaning: the exact semantic content of every technical statement must be unchanged
- Output format: revised text + polish report. No preamble or trailing changelog unless user asks
- When uncertain about domain terminology: keep the original, flag for user review
Execution Modes
| Mode | Command | Behavior |
|---|
full (default) | "polish this paper" | Phase A → Phase B (all 8 dimensions) |
deai-only | "just reduce AI rate" / "只降AI率" | Phase A only |
polish-only | "just polish, skip de-AI" / "只润色" | Phase B only (all 8 dimensions) |
polish-select | "fix grammar and coherence" | Phase B, selected dimensions only |
Step 0: Input Processing
- Identify input format:
- PDF → extract visible text (preserve section structure)
- LaTeX → extract visible paragraphs (protect all commands)
- Markdown / plain text → use directly
- Identify protection zones: math environments, citations, labels, algorithm blocks, code blocks, figure/table environments
- Ask target journal (optional): affects Dimension 8 scoring. If not specified, use general academic standards.
- Confirm execution mode: full / deai-only / polish-only / polish-select
Step 1: Phase A — De-AI Editing
Reference files:
references/ai-detection-patterns.md — pattern library for scanning
references/de-ai-strategies.md — rewriting strategies
references/word-choice-anti-ai.md — word replacement table
1.1 Scan
Scan text against ai-detection-patterns.md. Categorize findings:
- High priority: Tier 1 words, template phrases, burstiness deficit (SD < 8), RLHF fingerprints
- Medium priority: Tier 2 threshold violations, structural symmetry, transition stacking
- Low priority: Tier 3 context-dependent, punctuation fingerprints, minor style uniformity
1.2 Rewrite (Priority Order)
Follow the strategy priority from de-ai-strategies.md:
a. Burstiness enforcement — restructure sentence lengths (Strategy 1)
Target: SD > 8, range ≥ 20, mid-band < 50%
b. Vocabulary de-AI — replace Tier 1 words, compress template phrases (Strategy 2)
Consult word-choice-anti-ai.md for replacements
c. Sentence restructuring — vary syntax patterns (Strategy 3)
No 3+ consecutive same-structure sentences
d. Concept concretization — add specifics where available (Strategy 4)
Replace vague claims with data from the paper itself
e. Argumentation enrichment — add depth to claims (Strategy 5)
Insert boundary conditions, alternative interpretations
f. Perplexity elevation — introduce unpredictability (Strategy 6)
Unconventional openers, domain-specific minor terms
g. Style disruption — break uniformity (Strategy 7)
Vary paragraph density and register between sections
1.3 Self-Audit
After rewriting, re-scan output against ai-detection-patterns.md:
- Any remaining High-priority patterns? → fix them
- Burstiness check: SD > 8? Range ≥ 20? Mid-band < 50%?
- Protection zones intact? (LaTeX commands, math, citations unchanged)
- Meaning preserved? (no semantic drift from original)
Step 2: Phase B — 8-Dimension Polish
Reference file: references/polish-dimensions.md
2.1 Score All Dimensions (1-5)
Rate each dimension based on the checkpoints in polish-dimensions.md:
- Grammar & Syntax
- Academic Tone
- Coherence & Flow
- Conciseness
- Terminology
- Structure & Formatting
- Clarity of Argument
- Journal Compliance
2.2 Edit Dimensions Scoring ≤ 3
Edit in this order (foundation → logic → style → format):
Dim 1 (Grammar) → Dim 7 (Clarity) → Dim 3 (Coherence) →
Dim 4 (Conciseness) → Dim 2 (Tone) → Dim 5 (Terminology) →
Dim 6 (Structure) → Dim 8 (Journal)
2.3 Preservation Check
During Phase B editing, verify Phase A improvements are maintained:
- Burstiness NOT reduced (sentence length variety preserved)
- No Tier 1 AI words reintroduced
- No template phrases reintroduced
- Punctuation fingerprints still clean (em dash count, etc.)
2.4 Re-Score
Rate edited dimensions again. Record "Before" and "After" scores for the report.
Step 3: Output
3.1 Revised Text
Output the complete polished text with all modifications applied.
Format matches the input format (LaTeX → LaTeX, Markdown → Markdown, etc.).
3.2 Polish Report
Generate report using templates/polish-report.md:
- Phase A summary: Number of AI traces detected and fixed, by priority level
- Phase B scorecard: 8 dimensions, before/after scores, key changes per dimension
- Top modifications: Up to 10 most significant before/after comparisons with reasoning
- Pending items: Anything marked
[PENDING VERIFICATION] or requiring user decision
Section-Specific Guidance
Abstract
- Phase A focus: Remove "In recent years", overclaiming words, template openings
- Phase B focus: Ensure all 6 elements present (context, gap, approach, insight, results, significance)
- Length: Check against venue limits (typically 150-250 words)
Introduction
- Phase A focus: Break three-part parallel structures, remove "has attracted growing attention"
- Phase B focus: Contributions must be specific and verifiable, not vague
Methods
- Phase A focus: Restore active subjects ("We" not passive-only), vary procedural sentence length
- Phase B focus: Every symbol defined before use, equations motivated and interpreted
Results
- Phase A focus: Replace "clearly demonstrates" with data speaking for itself
- Phase B focus: Every claim backed by table/figure reference, statistical measures included
Discussion
- Phase A focus: Break balanced-hedging patterns, ensure position is taken
- Phase B focus: Limitations acknowledged specifically, future work concrete
Conclusion
- Phase A focus: Remove "In conclusion, this paper presents" opener
- Phase B focus: Brief, no methodology restatement, concrete future work
Voice Calibration (Optional)
If the user provides their previously published papers:
- Extract author writing profile (sentence length distribution, connector preferences, punctuation habits)
- Use author's actual patterns as the target instead of generic "human-sounding" defaults
- Note in report: "Voice calibrated against [paper title]"
This replaces generic de-AI rewrites with author-specific style matching.
Usage Examples
Full polish:
"请润色这篇论文" / "Polish this paper for NeurIPS submission"
De-AI only:
"只帮我降AI率" / "Reduce the AI detection score, don't change anything else"
Selective polish:
"只检查语法和术语一致性" / "Just fix grammar and check terminology consistency"
With voice calibration:
"用我之前发的这篇论文的风格来润色" / "Polish matching my writing style from this published paper"
© License
MIT License — © 2026 Shuo Zhao. All rights reserved.
This skill is part of the Aut_Sci_Write suite.