Skip to main content

you-might-not-need-a-comment

Analyze and fix redundant or self-explanatory inline comments — remove noise, promote genuine documentation to TSDoc

معلومات المصدر

المستودع
simstudioai/sim
آخر نشاط في المصدر
٢ أكتوبر ٢٠٢٦ في ٠٨:٥٩
لغة SKILL.md المكتشفة
الإنجليزية
النجوم
٢٩٬٧٧٩
التفرعات
٣٬٨٥٢

خيارات التثبيت

يُحدَّد Prompt الذي يراجع المصدر أولًا بشكل افتراضي. يمكنك التبديل إلى أمر مباشر أو تنزيل نسخة محلية.

مراجعة ملفات المصدر

اقرأ SKILL.md وأي ملفات مرافقة يعرضها SkillsMP قبل أن تقرر التثبيت.

عرض SKILL.md

SKILL.md
تعليمات المصدر · معاينة للقراءة فقط
name
you-might-not-need-a-comment
description
Analyze and fix redundant or self-explanatory inline comments — remove noise, promote genuine documentation to TSDoc
argument-hint
[scope] [fix=true|false]
# You Might Not Need a Comment Arguments: - scope: what to analyze (default: your current changes). Examples: "diff to main", "PR #123", "src/components/", "whole codebase" - fix: whether to apply fixes (default: true). Set to false to only propose changes. User arguments: $ARGUMENTS ## The one rule that matters A comment must add information the code cannot express itself. Code says *what* and *how*; a comment earns its place only by explaining *why* — a non-obvious constraint, a workaround, a decision, a gotcha. If deleting the comment loses no information a competent reader wouldn't recover from the code in seconds, delete it. This codebase's convention: **TSDoc for documentation; an inline `//` only for a terse non-obvious why or a script-enforced annotation; no `====` separators.** Genuine documentation belongs in a `/** ... */` block on the declaration; everything that survives as an inline `//` comment must be a real *why*, kept terse. ## Anti-patterns to detect 1. **Restates the code**: `// increment counter` above `counter++`, `// return the result` above `return result`, `// loop over items`. Delete. 2. **Narrates the obvious from names**: the function is `fetchUserById`, the comment says `// fetches a user by id`. The identifier already said it. Delete. 3. **Section-divider / banner comments**: `// ==== Helpers ====`, `// --- state ---`, `// #region`. Against convention. Delete (the code's structure is the structure). 4. **Commented-out code**: dead code left as a comment. Delete — git is the history. 5. **Redundant type/param echo in prose comments**: `// takes a string and returns a number` when the signature already says so. Delete. 6. **Changelog / attribution noise**: `// added by X`, `// TODO(2021): ...` long-stale, `// fix for bug`. Delete unless it encodes a live, actionable constraint. 7. **Genuine documentation written as a loose `//` block on a declaration**: a real explanation of what an exported function/type/const is for, but written as stacked `//` lines instead of TSDoc. Convert to a `/** ... */` TSDoc block on the declaration. ## Patterns that ARE correct — do not flag - A `//` comment that explains a **non-obvious why**: a workaround for an upstream bug, an ordering constraint, a perf reason, a spec/edge-case the code can't self-document (`// first-match wins — matches the old find() semantics`). - Existing TSDoc `/** ... */` blocks on declarations — leave them (only tighten if verbose). - `// boundary-raw-fetch:`, `// double-cast-allowed:`, `// boundary-raw-json:`, `// untyped-response:`, `-- migration-safe:` (SQL migrations), `// rq-lint-allow:`, `// client-boundary-allow:` and any other `<kebab-tag>: <reason>` annotation a script under `scripts/` greps for, in line-comment or block-comment form (e.g. the `/** svg-path-precision-exception: ... */` directive on icon paths) — these are load-bearing, never touch them. - `// biome-ignore`, `// eslint-disable`, `// @ts-expect-error` and other tooling directives. - `// TODO` / `// FIXME` that point at real, still-open work. ## Bias Prefer **deletion over rewriting**, and **no comment over a comment** when the code is already clear. When a comment is genuine documentation, prefer promoting it to terse TSDoc over leaving a loose `//` block. Never add new comments in this pass — this is a reduction pass. When unsure whether a comment encodes a real *why*, keep it. ## Steps 1. Analyze the specified scope for the anti-patterns listed above 2. If fix=true, apply the fixes. If fix=false, propose the fixes without applying.
عرض على GitHub