onemore-telemetry-extrapolation
Estimate OneMore command usage across the full user base by extrapolating from opt-in telemetry data. Scales telemetry counts by assumed opt-in rates to model actual usage patterns.
معلومات المصدر
- المستودع
- stevencohn/OneMore
- آخر نشاط في المصدر
- ١٧ سبتمبر ٢٠٢٦ في ١٤:٢٨
- لغة SKILL.md المكتشفة
- الإنجليزية
- النجوم
- ٣٬٤١٤
- التفرعات
- ٢٥٧
خيارات التثبيت
يُحدَّد Prompt الذي يراجع المصدر أولًا بشكل افتراضي. يمكنك التبديل إلى أمر مباشر أو تنزيل نسخة محلية.
مراجعة ملفات المصدر
اقرأ SKILL.md وأي ملفات مرافقة يعرضها SkillsMP قبل أن تقرر التثبيت.
عرض SKILL.md
SKILL.md
تعليمات المصدر · معاينة للقراءة فقط- name
- onemore-telemetry-extrapolation
- description
- Estimate OneMore command usage across the full user base by extrapolating from opt-in telemetry data. Scales telemetry counts by assumed opt-in rates to model actual usage patterns.
- license
- Proprietary
# OneMore Telemetry Extrapolation
Estimate how often each OneMore command is executed across your entire user base, even though only a subset of users have opted into telemetry.
## Overview
Your telemetry data captures only a fraction of actual usage (opt-in users). This skill extrapolates from known telemetry counts to estimate total command executions across all users by modeling different opt-in rate scenarios.
**Key assumption:** Telemetry users behave similarly to non-telemetry users (no selection bias).
## Methodology
### Input Data Required
1. **Unique telemetry sessions per month** — e.g., 3,368
2. **Monthly downloads** — e.g., 2,992
3. **Top command counts from telemetry** — with per-month averages for each command
The maintained Excel file containing this data is here: "C:\Users\steve\OneDrive\OneMore\Metrics.xlsx"
### Calculation
For each command, divide the telemetry count by the assumed opt-in rate:
```
Estimated Total Usage = Telemetry Count ÷ Opt-in Rate
```
**Example:** If ExportCLI shows 7,249 executions in telemetry, and you assume 10% opt-in:
- Estimated total = 7,249 ÷ 0.10 = **72,490 executions/month**
### Scenario Models
| Scenario | Opt-in Rate | Use Case |
|----------|------------|----------|
| **Conservative** | 5% | Very low adoption; privacy-conscious user base |
| **Moderate** | 10% | Balanced assumption; typical default behavior |
| **Optimistic** | 20% | Higher adoption; users generally accept telemetry |
| **Very High** | 30% | Aggressive opt-in; enthusiast or enterprise users |
**Most likely:** 10-20% opt-in, based on typical SaaS adoption patterns.
## Usage
### Step 1: Gather Your Data
Collect from your telemetry system:
- Total unique sessions recorded this month
- Average sessions per month (over your tracking period)
- Top N commands, with counts and per-month averages
- Download volume (context only)
### Step 2: Choose Your Scenario
Pick the opt-in rate that best matches your user base:
- **Opt-in telemetry is required or pre-enabled?** → Use Very High (30%) or Optimistic (20%)
- **Opt-in is default but users can disable?** → Use Moderate (10%)
- **Opt-in requires deliberate action?** → Use Conservative (5%)
### Step 3: Scale the Data
For each command, multiply by the inverse of your chosen opt-in rate:
```python
estimated_usage = telemetry_count / opt_in_rate
```
Python example:
```python
commands = {
'ExportCLI': 7249,
'ApplyStyle': 4780,
'PasteText': 1811,
}
opt_in_rate = 0.10 # 10% scenario
for command, count in commands.items():
estimated = count / opt_in_rate
print(f"{command}: {estimated:,.0f}/month")
```
### Step 4: Analyze Results
- **Top commands** tend to be used 10-100x more often than edge commands
- **Power-user commands** (e.g., CLI, batch operations) dominate usage
- **Formatting/styling commands** are second-tier staples
- **Niche/specialized commands** cluster at the low end
## Example Results
Based on OneMore data (May–Sep 2026):
| Command | Telemetry | Moderate (10%) | Optimistic (20%) |
|---------|-----------|---|---|
| ExportCLI | 7,249 | 72,490 | 36,245 |
| ApplyStyle | 4,780 | 47,803 | 23,902 |
| PasteText | 1,811 | 18,110 | 9,055 |
| InsertToc | 1,709 | 17,087 | 8,543 |
| JoinParagraph | 1,534 | 15,340 | 7,670 |
**Interpretation:** In the Moderate scenario, ExportCLI is run ~72k times per month across all users—roughly 2.5x more than ApplyStyle.
## Important Limitations
⚠️ **Selection bias.** Users who opt into telemetry may not represent the full user base:
- Power users might opt in more (inflating active-command estimates)
- Privacy-conscious users opt out (missing conservative usage patterns)
- Different segments (free vs. paid, enterprise vs. individual) may have different opt-in rates
⚠️ **Downloads ≠ active users:**
- Same user downloading updates multiple times
- Downloads from users who never activate the product
- No data on churn (how long users remain active)
⚠️ **Sessions ≠ users:**
- A single user may have multiple sessions (different machines, reinstalls)
- No visibility into one-time users vs. power users
⚠️ **Data quality:**
- Telemetry may miss certain commands (network issues, offline mode)
- Commands may be recorded multiple times per action
- Session lifetime definition affects session counts
## When to Use This Analysis
✅ **Good for:**
- Prioritizing which features to optimize (focus on high-usage commands)
- Forecasting server load or backend traffic
- Identifying feature tiers (which commands power users rely on)
- Comparing relative usage (ExportCLI vs. ApplyStyle) more reliably than absolute numbers
- Detecting seasonal or trend changes in command popularity
❌ **Not reliable for:**
- Precise user counts (opt-in rates vary too much)
- Predicting user growth (downloads are lagging, not predictive)
- Per-user metrics (no session-to-user mapping)
- Business metrics (revenue, churn, retention)
## Refining Your Estimate
Over time, you can calibrate your opt-in rate:
1. **Run an A/B test:** Disable telemetry, track product usage another way (server logs), then compare
2. **Survey users:** Ask opt-in vs. opt-out users about their behavior
3. **Compare with server logs:** If you have backend data (API calls, file writes), correlate with telemetry counts
4. **Monitor anomalies:** If a command's telemetry count suddenly spikes/drops, check if opt-in rate changed
## Tools & Scripts
### Python Script
```python
import json
def extrapolate_usage(telemetry_data, opt_in_rate):
"""
Scale telemetry counts to estimate full-user-base usage.
Args:
telemetry_data: dict of {command: telemetry_count}
opt_in_rate: float (e.g., 0.10 for 10%)
Returns:
dict of {command: estimated_total}
"""
return {
cmd: count / opt_in_rate
for cmd, count in telemetry_data.items()
}
# Usage
telemetry = {
'ExportCLI': 7249,
'ApplyStyle': 4780,
'PasteText': 1811,
}
scenarios = {
'Conservative (5%)': 0.05,
'Moderate (10%)': 0.10,
'Optimistic (20%)': 0.20,
'Very High (30%)': 0.30,
}
for scenario_name, rate in scenarios.items():
estimated = extrapolate_usage(telemetry, rate)
print(f"\n{scenario_name}:")
for cmd, est_count in sorted(estimated.items(), key=lambda x: -x[1]):
print(f" {cmd}: {est_count:,.0f}/month")
```
### CSV Format
Export your results to CSV for spreadsheet analysis:
```
Command,Telemetry,Conservative (5%),Moderate (10%),Optimistic (20%),Very High (30%)
ExportCLI,7249,144980,72490,36245,24163
ApplyStyle,4780,95607,47803,23902,15934
PasteText,1811,36220,18110,9055,6037
...
```
## References
- **Opt-in telemetry best practices:** https://telemetry.microsoft.com/
- **Selection bias in observational data:** https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selection_bias
- **Survivorship bias & telemetry:** https://www.lessig.org/survivorshipbias/
---
**Last updated:** September 2026
**Methodology source:** Extrapolation from OneMore telemetry, May–September 2026
عرض على GitHub