Skip to main content

pymc-bayesian-modeling

Bayesian modeling with PyMC. Build hierarchical models, MCMC (NUTS), variational inference, LOO/WAIC comparison, posterior checks, for probabilistic programming and inference.

معلومات المصدر

المستودع
synthetic-sciences/openscience
آخر نشاط في المصدر
٢٠ سبتمبر ٢٠٢٦ في ١١:٣٥
لغة SKILL.md المكتشفة
الإنجليزية
النجوم
٤٬٢٥١
التفرعات
٥٣٢

خيارات التثبيت

يُحدَّد Prompt الذي يراجع المصدر أولًا بشكل افتراضي. يمكنك التبديل إلى أمر مباشر أو تنزيل نسخة محلية.

مراجعة ملفات المصدر

اقرأ SKILL.md وأي ملفات مرافقة يعرضها SkillsMP قبل أن تقرر التثبيت.

مستكشف الملفات
8 ملفات

عرض SKILL.md

SKILL.md
تعليمات المصدر · معاينة للقراءة فقط
name
pymc-bayesian-modeling
description
Bayesian modeling with PyMC. Build hierarchical models, MCMC (NUTS), variational inference, LOO/WAIC comparison, posterior checks, for probabilistic programming and inference.
category
coding
license
Apache License, Version 2.0
metadata
{"upstream":"K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills","upstream-url":"https://github.com/K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills","upstream-path":"skills/pymc","upstream-license":"MIT","upstream-relationship":"derived","adapted-by":"Synthetic Sciences","skill-author":"K-Dense Inc."}
version
1.0.0
author
K-Dense Inc.
tags
["Bayesian","MCMC","Probabilistic Programming","Statistics"]
dependencies
["pymc>=5.10.0","arviz>=0.17.0","numpy>=1.25.0"]
# PyMC Bayesian Modeling ## Overview PyMC is a Python library for Bayesian modeling and probabilistic programming. Build, fit, validate, and compare Bayesian models using PyMC's modern API (version 5.x+), including hierarchical models, MCMC sampling (NUTS), variational inference, and model comparison (LOO, WAIC). ## When to Use This Skill This skill should be used when: - Building Bayesian models (linear/logistic regression, hierarchical models, time series, etc.) - Performing MCMC sampling or variational inference - Conducting prior/posterior predictive checks - Diagnosing sampling issues (divergences, convergence, ESS) - Comparing multiple models using information criteria (LOO, WAIC) - Implementing uncertainty quantification through Bayesian methods - Working with hierarchical/multilevel data structures - Handling missing data or measurement error in a principled way ## Standard Bayesian Workflow Follow this workflow for building and validating Bayesian models: ### 1. Data Preparation ```python import pymc as pm import arviz as az import numpy as np # Load and prepare data X = ... # Predictors y = ... # Outcomes # Standardize predictors for better sampling X_mean = X.mean(axis=0) X_std = X.std(axis=0) X_scaled = (X - X_mean) / X_std ``` **Key practices:** - Standardize continuous predictors (improves sampling efficiency) - Center outcomes when possible - Handle missing data explicitly (treat as parameters) - Use named dimensions with `coords` for clarity ### 2. Model Building ```python coords = { 'predictors': ['var1', 'var2', 'var3'], 'obs_id': np.arange(len(y)) } with pm.Model(coords=coords) as model: # Priors alpha = pm.Normal('alpha', mu=0, sigma=1) beta = pm.Normal('beta', mu=0, sigma=1, dims='predictors') sigma = pm.HalfNormal('sigma', sigma=1) # Linear predictor mu = alpha + pm.math.dot(X_scaled, beta) # Likelihood y_obs = pm.Normal('y_obs', mu=mu, sigma=sigma, observed=y, dims='obs_id') ``` **Key practices:** - Use weakly informative priors (not flat priors) - Use `HalfNormal` or `Exponential` for scale parameters - Use named dimensions (`dims`) instead of `shape` when possible - Use `pm.Data()` for values that will be updated for predictions ### 3. Prior Predictive Check **Always validate priors before fitting:** ```python with model: prior_pred = pm.sample_prior_predictive(samples=1000, random_seed=42) # Visualize az.plot_ppc(prior_pred, group='prior') ``` **Check:** - Do prior predictions span reasonable values? - Are extreme values plausible given domain knowledge? - If priors generate implausible data, adjust and re-check ### 4. Fit Model ```python with model: # Optional: Quick exploration with ADVI # approx = pm.fit(n=20000) # Full MCMC inference idata = pm.sample( draws=2000, tune=1000, chains=4, target_accept=0.9, random_seed=42, idata_kwargs={'log_likelihood': True} # For model comparison ) ``` **Key parameters:** - `draws=2000`: Number of samples per chain - `tune=1000`: Warmup samples (discarded) - `chains=4`: Run 4 chains for convergence checking - `target_accept=0.9`: Higher for difficult posteriors (0.95-0.99) - Include `log_likelihood=True` for model comparison ### 5. Check Diagnostics **Use the diagnostic script:** ```python from scripts.model_diagnostics import check_diagnostics results = check_diagnostics(idata, var_names=['alpha', 'beta', 'sigma']) ``` **Check:** - **R-hat < 1.01**: Chains have converged - **ESS > 400**: Sufficient effective samples - **No divergences**: NUTS sampled successfully - **Trace plots**: Chains should mix well (fuzzy caterpillar) **If issues arise:** - Divergences → Increase `target_accept=0.95`, use non-centered parameterization - Low ESS → Sample more draws, reparameterize to reduce correlation - High R-hat → Run longer, check for multimodality ### 6. Posterior Predictive Check **Validate model fit:** ```python with model: pm.sample_posterior_predictive(idata, extend_inferencedata=True, random_seed=42) # Visualize az.plot_ppc(idata) ``` **Check:** - Do posterior predictions capture observed data patterns? - Are systematic deviations evident (model misspecification)? - Consider alternative models if fit is poor ### 7. Analyze Results ```python # Summary statistics print(az.summary(idata, var_names=['alpha', 'beta', 'sigma'])) # Posterior distributions az.plot_posterior(idata, var_names=['alpha', 'beta', 'sigma']) # Coefficient estimates az.plot_forest(idata, var_names=['beta'], combined=True) ``` ### 8. Make Predictions ```python X_new = ... # New predictor values X_new_scaled = (X_new - X_mean) / X_std with model: pm.set_data({'X_scaled': X_new_scaled}) post_pred = pm.sample_posterior_predictive( idata.posterior, var_names=['y_obs'], random_seed=42 ) # Extract prediction intervals y_pred_mean = post_pred.posterior_predictive['y_obs'].mean(dim=['chain', 'draw']) y_pred_hdi = az.hdi(post_pred.posterior_predictive, var_names=['y_obs']) ``` ## Common Model Patterns ### Linear Regression For continuous outcomes with linear relationships: ```python with pm.Model() as linear_model: alpha = pm.Normal('alpha', mu=0, sigma=10) beta = pm.Normal('beta', mu=0, sigma=10, shape=n_predictors) sigma = pm.HalfNormal('sigma', sigma=1) mu = alpha + pm.math.dot(X, beta) y = pm.Normal('y', mu=mu, sigma=sigma, observed=y_obs) ``` **Use template:** `assets/linear_regression_template.py` ### Logistic Regression For binary outcomes: ```python with pm.Model() as logistic_model: alpha = pm.Normal('alpha', mu=0, sigma=10) beta = pm.Normal('beta', mu=0, sigma=10, shape=n_predictors) logit_p = alpha + pm.math.dot(X, beta) y = pm.Bernoulli('y', logit_p=logit_p, observed=y_obs) ``` ### Hierarchical Models For grouped data (use non-centered parameterization): ```python with pm.Model(coords={'groups': group_names}) as hierarchical_model: # Hyperpriors mu_alpha = pm.Normal('mu_alpha', mu=0, sigma=10) sigma_alpha = pm.HalfNormal('sigma_alpha', sigma=1) # Group-level (non-centered) alpha_offset = pm.Normal('alpha_offset', mu=0, sigma=1, dims='groups') alpha = pm.Deterministic('alpha', mu_alpha + sigma_alpha * alpha_offset, dims='groups') # Observation-level mu = alpha[group_idx] sigma = pm.HalfNormal('sigma', sigma=1) y = pm.Normal('y', mu=mu, sigma=sigma, observed=y_obs) ``` **Use template:** `assets/hierarchical_model_template.py` **Critical:** Always use non-centered parameterization for hierarchical models to avoid divergences. ### Poisson Regression For count data: ```python with pm.Model() as poisson_model: alpha = pm.Normal('alpha', mu=0, sigma=10) beta = pm.Normal('beta', mu=0, sigma=10, shape=n_predictors) log_lambda = alpha + pm.math.dot(X, beta) y = pm.Poisson('y', mu=pm.math.exp(log_lambda), observed=y_obs) ``` For overdispersed counts, use `NegativeBinomial` instead. ### Time Series For autoregressive processes: ```python with pm.Model() as ar_model: sigma = pm.HalfNormal('sigma', sigma=1) rho = pm.Normal('rho', mu=0, sigma=0.5, shape=ar_order) init_dist = pm.Normal.dist(mu=0, sigma=sigma) y = pm.AR('y', rho=rho, sigma=sigma, init_dist=init_dist, observed=y_obs) ``` ## Model Comparison ### Comparing Models Use LOO or WAIC for model comparison: ```python from scripts.model_comparison import compare_models, check_loo_reliability # Fit models with log_likelihood models = { 'Model1': idata1, 'Model2': idata2, 'Model3': idata3 } # Compare using LOO comparison = compare_models(models, ic='loo') # Check reliability check_loo_reliability(models) ``` **Interpretation:** - **Δloo < 2**: Models are similar, choose simpler model - **2 < Δloo < 4**: Weak evidence for better model - **4 < Δloo < 10**: Moderate evidence - **Δloo > 10**: Strong evidence for better model **Check Pareto-k values:** - k < 0.7: LOO reliable - k > 0.7: Consider WAIC or k-fold CV ### Model Averaging When models are similar, average predictions: ```python from scripts.model_comparison import model_averaging averaged_pred, weights = model_averaging(models, var_name='y_obs') ``` ## Distribution Selection Guide ### For Priors **Scale parameters** (σ, τ): - `pm.HalfNormal('sigma', sigma=1)` - Default choice - `pm.Exponential('sigma', lam=1)` - Alternative - `pm.Gamma('sigma', alpha=2, beta=1)` - More informative **Unbounded parameters**: - `pm.Normal('theta', mu=0, sigma=1)` - For standardized data - `pm.StudentT('theta', nu=3, mu=0, sigma=1)` - Robust to outliers **Positive parameters**: - `pm.LogNormal('theta', mu=0, sigma=1)` - `pm.Gamma('theta', alpha=2, beta=1)` **Probabilities**: - `pm.Beta('p', alpha=2, beta=2)` - Weakly informative - `pm.Uniform('p', lower=0, upper=1)` - Non-informative (use sparingly) **Correlation matrices**: - `pm.LKJCorr('corr', n=n_vars, eta=2)` - eta=1 uniform, eta>1 prefers identity ### For Likelihoods **Continuous outcomes**: - `pm.Normal('y', mu=mu, sigma=sigma)` - Default for continuous data - `pm.StudentT('y', nu=nu, mu=mu, sigma=sigma)` - Robust to outliers **Count data**: - `pm.Poisson('y', mu=lambda)` - Equidispersed counts - `pm.NegativeBinomial('y', mu=mu, alpha=alpha)` - Overdispersed counts - `pm.ZeroInflatedPoisson('y', psi=psi, mu=mu)` - Excess zeros **Binary outcomes**: - `pm.Bernoulli('y', p=p)` or `pm.Bernoulli('y', logit_p=logit_p)` **Categorical outcomes**: - `pm.Categorical('y', p=probs)` **See:** `references/distributions.md` for comprehensive distribution reference ## Sampling and Inference ### MCMC with NUTS Default and recommended for most models: ```python idata = pm.sample( draws=2000, tune=1000, chains=4, target_accept=0.9, random_seed=42 ) ``` **Adjust when needed:** - Divergences → `target_accept=0.95` or higher - Slow sampling → Use ADVI for initialization - Discrete parameters → Use `pm.Metropolis()` for discrete vars ### Variational Inference Fast approximation for exploration or initialization: ```python with model: approx = pm.fit(n=20000, method='advi') # Use for initialization start = approx.sample(return_inferencedata=False)[0] idata = pm.sample(start=start) ``` **Trade-offs:** - Much faster than MCMC - Approximate (may underestimate uncertainty) - Good for large models or quick exploration **See:** `references/sampling_inference.md` for detailed sampling guide ## Diagnostic Scripts ### Comprehensive Diagnostics ```python from scripts.model_diagnostics import create_diagnostic_report create_diagnostic_report( idata,
عرض على GitHub
ملف SKILL.md هذا كبير جدا، لذلك يعرض SkillsMP القسم الاول فقط هنا. عرض على GitHub