| name | frama-c-proofreader |
| description | Verify and proofread C code with ACSL using this repository's Frama-C MCP workflow, Frama-C WP static proof, EVA alarms, and optional E-ACSL runtime checks. Use when asked to run Frama-C, check ACSL contracts, explain WP goals, inspect EVA alarms, validate C annotations, or state what a C proof does and does not establish. |
Frama-C Proofreader
Workflow
Prefer the MCP server when it is available. Start with the install check and the shortest useful call:
self_check {}
reload_project {files, rte: true}
check {function?, timeout?}
If check reports alarms or non-valid goals, inspect the concrete payload before changing code:
get_eva_alarms {function?, status?}
investigate_alarm {property_key, depth}
get_wp_goals {function, status?}
get_wp_goals {function, detail: true}
context {function, want: ["current_annotations", "function_ast"]}
Validate candidate ACSL with dry-run injection first:
inject_all_annotations {function, dry_run: true, annotations: [{kind, acsl, ...}]}
inject_all_annotations {function, annotations: [{kind, acsl, ...}]}
run_wp {functions: [function]}
Use run_e_acsl only as runtime evidence for concrete executions. If it is unavailable or fails to compile instrumentation, report that runtime checking was unavailable.
Read references/mcp-workflow.md for the full MCP call order, references/wp-output.md when interpreting WP goals, and references/e-acsl-output.md before making runtime-check claims.
Reporting
Always separate these outcomes:
- Environment failure: tool missing, prover not configured, instrumentation failed.
- Static proof gap: WP did not prove a goal; this is not automatically a bug.
- Runtime violation: E-ACSL found a violation on an executed path.
- Proven under assumptions: WP proved the generated goals for the ACSL and RTE configuration that actually ran.
Do not claim proof without tool output. Report exact goal names, proof counts, and whether rte: true or -wp-rte was used.
Boundaries
WP proves obligations generated from the C program and ACSL. It does not prove requirements that were omitted from the specification.
EVA alarms and WP goals are complementary. A clean WP result does not replace checking missing frame conditions or assumed callee contracts.
E-ACSL checks only executed paths and inputs. Passing one run is evidence, not exhaustive proof.
