| name | ieee-polishing |
| description | Polish academic prose to IEEE-journal style at the sentence level — clarity, sentence length, section-appropriate tense, calibrated hedging, US English, acronym discipline, numbered-citation phrasing, and unit/number formatting. Also translate Chinese drafts into IEEE-style English. Use this whenever the user wants to "polish", "proofread", "improve the English", "make it publishable / native", "fix the grammar", "润色", "改成地道英文", "改成投稿级" on existing text. Tuned for IEEE communications papers (per-section tense for system model / problem formulation / proposed solution / numerical results). For building or restructuring the argument and sections, use ieee-writing instead. |
IEEE-Style Language Polishing
Use this skill to bring existing sentences to IEEE journal standard. If the text needs its
argument or structure rebuilt, use ieee-writing first, then polish here.
Core stance
- Preserve meaning; never add claims. Polishing changes wording, not facts. Do not introduce
numbers, citations, or assertions the author did not make.
- Clarity over elegance. A plain, precise sentence beats an ornate one. IEEE values
verifiable clarity, not literary flair.
- US English by default (IEEE house style):
color, analyze, modeling, behavior,
optimize, center, fiber. (This is the opposite of Nature's British spelling.)
- Calibrate claim strength to evidence (see hedging ladder below).
- Return plain, copy-pasteable text. Do not wrap output in commentary the user must strip out.
When to open extra files
Hedging ladder (match the verb to the evidence)
strong, directly measured show, demonstrate, establish
inferential indicate, suggest, imply
possible / partial may, can, could, appear to, is consistent with
Over-claim is the most common reviewer irritation. If the evidence is one experiment, do not say
"prove" or "in all cases". Downgrade the verb instead of adding qualifiers like "very".
Polishing workflow
- Split into sentences. Inspect each individually — the last sentence of a paragraph fails most.
- Identify the section (it sets tense and hedging; see
references/section-moves.md).
- Length and one-idea check. Aim for ≤ ~25 words; break any sentence carrying two ideas.
- Tense audit. Results = past + numbers; method-as-procedure = past; the proposed method as
a standing object = present; Introduction background = present / present perfect.
- Edit each sentence for subject-action clarity, articles, and US spelling.
- Vocabulary upgrade. Replace vague verbs ("get", "do", "make") with precise ones; remove
filler ("it is worth noting that", "as we all know", "obviously").
- Acronym pass. Define each at first use in the body; do not define in the title; avoid
undefined acronyms in the abstract.
- Citation phrasing. Numbered
[n]; for author-prominent sentences use Smith et al. [12],
otherwise ... has been studied [12]. Do not use [12] as a noun ("in [12], the authors...").
- Overclaim sweep. Flag absolutes, unwarranted causation, scope creep, and unverified "first".
- US-English + house style (units, numbers, hyphenation).
- Proofread for articles, plurals, agreement — the classic non-native slips.
- Return plain text plus a short change log of the substantive edits.
Output format
Polished: the revised text, plain and copy-pasteable.Changes: a short list of the substantive edits (not every comma) — e.g. "downgraded
'prove' → 'indicate' (one experiment)", "split a 41-word sentence", "color/behavior to US".Flags: any sentence where wording could not be fixed without a fact the author must supply.
For Chinese input, give the polished English, then a brief 中文说明 of the main changes, and a
list of any claims that need a number or citation. (See ieee-writing's chinese-author-workflow.)
