slide-excellence

---

name: slide-excellence description: Run combined multi-dimensional slide review: visual audit, pedagogy review, and proofreading (and optionally TikZ parity). Use when the user asks for full or comprehensive slide review before a milestone.

Slide Excellence Review

Run a combined review: visual + pedagogy + proofreading (and TikZ/parity if relevant). Produce one synthesized report.

Steps

1. Identify the file from the user's message (in Quarto/ or Slides/).

2. Run these reviews (you are one agent doing all roles in sequence):

   • Visual audit: overflow, fonts, box fatigue, spacing → quality_reports/[FILE]_visual_audit.md
   • Pedagogy: 13 patterns, narrative, pacing, notation → quality_reports/[FILE]_pedagogy_report.md
   • Proofread: grammar, typos, consistency → quality_reports/[FILE]_report.md
   • TikZ (if file has TikZ): labels, geometry, semantics → quality_reports/[FILE]_tikz_review.md
   • Content parity (if .qmd with .tex): frame count, content drift → quality_reports/[FILE]_parity_report.md

3. Synthesize a single summary:

# Slide Excellence: [Filename]
## Overall: EXCELLENT / GOOD / NEEDS WORK / POOR
| Dimension    | Critical | Medium | Low |
| Visual       | ...     | ...   | ... |
| Pedagogical  | ...     | ...   | ... |
| Proofreading | ...     | ...   | ... |
### Critical (fix first)
### Medium (next revision)
### Next steps

4. Rubric: Excellent 0–2 critical / 0–5 medium; Good 3–5 / 6–15; Needs Work 6–10 / 16–30; Poor 11+ / 31+.