| name | on-device-model-training |
| description | On-Device Model Training enables training and updating machine learning Use when this capability is needed. |
| metadata | {"author":"amnadtaowsoam"} |
On Device Model Training
Skill Profile
(Select at least one profile to enable specific modules)
Overview
On-Device Model Training enables training and updating machine learning models directly on edge devices without transferring raw data to the cloud. This approach is essential for privacy-sensitive applications, reduces bandwidth costs, enables personalized models, and provides continuous learning capabilities even in offline environments.
Why This Matters
- Data Privacy: Raw data never leaves the device, ensuring compliance with privacy regulations
- Bandwidth Efficiency: Only model updates (gradients) are transmitted, reducing bandwidth costs by 95-99%
- Personalization: Models adapt to individual user patterns, improving user experience
- Offline Learning: Continuous improvement without connectivity, enabling edge AI in remote locations
- Regulatory Compliance: Meets GDPR, HIPAA, and other data protection requirements by design
Core Concepts & Rules
1. Core Principles
- Follow established patterns and conventions
- Maintain consistency across codebase
- Document decisions and trade-offs
2. Implementation Guidelines
- Start with the simplest viable solution
- Iterate based on feedback and requirements
- Test thoroughly before deployment
Inputs / Outputs / Contracts
- Inputs:
- Initial global model (PyTorch/TensorFlow)
- Client configuration (server URL, training parameters)
- Local data on client devices
- Privacy parameters (epsilon, delta, noise scale)
- Entry Conditions:
- Server deployed and accessible
- Initial global model trained and available
- Client devices have sufficient compute/memory for local training
- Network connectivity between clients and server
- Privacy parameters configured and documented
- Outputs:
- Updated global model (aggregated from client updates)
- Model version tracking
- Training metrics (accuracy, loss, client participation)
- Privacy budget tracking
- Artifacts Required (Deliverables):
- Federated learning server implementation
- Client training implementation
- Privacy protection modules
- Configuration files (server, client)
- Monitoring and logging infrastructure
- Acceptance Evidence:
- Global model converges to target accuracy (> 90% of centralized)
- Privacy budget respected (epsilon < 5% per round)
- Client participation rate > 70%
- Round completion time < 5 minutes
- Update success rate > 95%
- Success Criteria:
- Model accuracy within 90-95% of centralized training
- Privacy guarantees maintained (differential privacy, secure aggregation)
- Bandwidth reduction > 95% vs data upload
- Client participation > 70% of active clients
- Round completion < 5 minutes
- Update success rate > 95%
Skill Composition
Quick Start / Implementation Example
- Review requirements and constraints
- Set up development environment
- Implement core functionality following patterns
- Write tests for critical paths
- Run tests and fix issues
- Document any deviations or decisions
def example_function():
pass
Assumptions / Constraints / Non-goals
- Assumptions:
- Development environment is properly configured
- Required dependencies are available
- Team has basic understanding of domain
- Constraints:
- Must follow existing codebase conventions
- Time and resource limitations
- Compatibility requirements
- Non-goals:
- This skill does not cover edge cases outside scope
- Not a replacement for formal training
Compatibility & Prerequisites
- Supported Versions:
- Python 3.8+
- Node.js 16+
- Modern browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge)
- Required AI Tools:
- Code editor (VS Code recommended)
- Testing framework appropriate for language
- Version control (Git)
- Dependencies:
- Language-specific package manager
- Build tools
- Testing libraries
- Environment Setup:
.env.example keys: API_KEY, DATABASE_URL (no values)
Test Scenario Matrix (QA Strategy)
| Type | Focus Area | Required Scenarios / Mocks |
|---|
| Unit | Core Logic | Must cover primary logic and at least 3 edge/error cases. Target minimum 80% coverage |
| Integration | DB / API | All external API calls or database connections must be mocked during unit tests |
| E2E | User Journey | Critical user flows to test |
| Performance | Latency / Load | Benchmark requirements |
| Security | Vuln / Auth | SAST/DAST or dependency audit |
| Frontend | UX / A11y | Accessibility checklist (WCAG), Performance Budget (Lighthouse score) |
Technical Guardrails & Security Threat Model
1. Security & Privacy (Threat Model)
- Top Threats: Injection attacks, authentication bypass, data exposure
2. Performance & Resources
3. Architecture & Scalability
4. Observability & Reliability
Agent Directives & Error Recovery
(ข้อกำหนดสำหรับ AI Agent ในการคิดและแก้ปัญหาเมื่อเกิดข้อผิดพลาด)
- Thinking Process: Analyze root cause before fixing. Do not brute-force.
- Fallback Strategy: Stop after 3 failed test attempts. Output root cause and ask for human intervention/clarification.
- Self-Review: Check against Guardrails & Anti-patterns before finalizing.
- Output Constraints: Output ONLY the modified code block. Do not explain unless asked.
Definition of Done (DoD) Checklist
Anti-patterns / Pitfalls
- ⛔ Don't: Log PII, catch-all exception, N+1 queries
- ⚠️ Watch out for: Common symptoms and quick fixes
- 💡 Instead: Use proper error handling, pagination, and logging
Reference Links & Examples
- Internal documentation and examples
- Official documentation and best practices
- Community resources and discussions
Versioning & Changelog
- Version: 1.0.0
- Changelog:
- 2026-02-22: Initial version with complete template structure
Converted and distributed by TomeVault — claim your Tome and manage your conversions.