| name | tinyml-microcontroller-ai |
| description | TinyML Microcontroller AI enables deployment of machine learning models Use when this capability is needed. |
| metadata | {"author":"amnadtaowsoam"} |
Tinyml Microcontroller Ai
Skill Profile
(Select at least one profile to enable specific modules)
Overview
TinyML Microcontroller AI enables deployment of machine learning models on resource-constrained microcontrollers (MCUs) with limited memory, compute, and power. This capability is essential for edge AI applications requiring offline operation, low latency, and energy efficiency in industrial IoT, smart devices, and embedded systems.
Why This Matters
- Offline Intelligence: Enables AI capabilities without cloud connectivity, critical for remote or offline applications
- Low Latency: Sub-millisecond inference for real-time applications where every millisecond counts
- Energy Efficiency: Battery-powered devices with months/years of operation through power optimization
- Cost Reduction: Eliminates cloud infrastructure and data transfer costs by processing on-device
- Privacy: Data processing on-device without leaving the edge, ensuring data privacy and compliance
Core Concepts & Rules
1. Core Principles
- Follow established patterns and conventions
- Maintain consistency across codebase
- Document decisions and trade-offs
2. Implementation Guidelines
- Start with the simplest viable solution
- Iterate based on feedback and requirements
- Test thoroughly before deployment
Inputs / Outputs / Contracts
- Inputs:
- Trained TensorFlow/Keras model
- Representative dataset for quantization
- Target hardware specifications (RAM, Flash, compute)
- Performance requirements (latency, power)
- Entry Conditions:
- TensorFlow/Keras model trained and validated
- Target microcontroller selected and available
- Development environment set up (PlatformIO, STM32CubeIDE, etc.)
- Hardware constraints understood and documented
- Outputs:
- Quantized TFLite model file (.tflite)
- C header file with model data
- Inference implementation code
- Performance metrics (latency, memory, power)
- Artifacts Required (Deliverables):
- TFLite model file
- C header file (model_data.cc/h)
- Inference class implementation
- Main application code
- Performance benchmark results
- Acceptance Evidence:
- Inference latency measurement (< 100ms)
- Memory usage report (RAM/Flash)
- Power consumption measurement (< 10mW)
- Accuracy comparison with original model (> 95%)
- Success Criteria:
- Model size fits in flash memory
- Tensor arena fits in RAM
- Inference latency meets requirements (< 100ms)
- Power consumption within budget (< 10mW)
- Accuracy within acceptable range (> 95% of cloud model)
Skill Composition
Quick Start / Implementation Example
- Review requirements and constraints
- Set up development environment
- Implement core functionality following patterns
- Write tests for critical paths
- Run tests and fix issues
- Document any deviations or decisions
def example_function():
pass
Assumptions / Constraints / Non-goals
- Assumptions:
- Development environment is properly configured
- Required dependencies are available
- Team has basic understanding of domain
- Constraints:
- Must follow existing codebase conventions
- Time and resource limitations
- Compatibility requirements
- Non-goals:
- This skill does not cover edge cases outside scope
- Not a replacement for formal training
Compatibility & Prerequisites
- Supported Versions:
- Python 3.8+
- Node.js 16+
- Modern browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge)
- Required AI Tools:
- Code editor (VS Code recommended)
- Testing framework appropriate for language
- Version control (Git)
- Dependencies:
- Language-specific package manager
- Build tools
- Testing libraries
- Environment Setup:
.env.example keys: API_KEY, DATABASE_URL (no values)
Test Scenario Matrix (QA Strategy)
| Type | Focus Area | Required Scenarios / Mocks |
|---|
| Unit | Core Logic | Must cover primary logic and at least 3 edge/error cases. Target minimum 80% coverage |
| Integration | DB / API | All external API calls or database connections must be mocked during unit tests |
| E2E | User Journey | Critical user flows to test |
| Performance | Latency / Load | Benchmark requirements |
| Security | Vuln / Auth | SAST/DAST or dependency audit |
| Frontend | UX / A11y | Accessibility checklist (WCAG), Performance Budget (Lighthouse score) |
Technical Guardrails & Security Threat Model
1. Security & Privacy (Threat Model)
- Top Threats: Injection attacks, authentication bypass, data exposure
2. Performance & Resources
3. Architecture & Scalability
4. Observability & Reliability
Agent Directives & Error Recovery
(ข้อกำหนดสำหรับ AI Agent ในการคิดและแก้ปัญหาเมื่อเกิดข้อผิดพลาด)
- Thinking Process: Analyze root cause before fixing. Do not brute-force.
- Fallback Strategy: Stop after 3 failed test attempts. Output root cause and ask for human intervention/clarification.
- Self-Review: Check against Guardrails & Anti-patterns before finalizing.
- Output Constraints: Output ONLY the modified code block. Do not explain unless asked.
Definition of Done (DoD) Checklist
Anti-patterns / Pitfalls
- ⛔ Don't: Log PII, catch-all exception, N+1 queries
- ⚠️ Watch out for: Common symptoms and quick fixes
- 💡 Instead: Use proper error handling, pagination, and logging
Reference Links & Examples
- Internal documentation and examples
- Official documentation and best practices
- Community resources and discussions
Versioning & Changelog
- Version: 1.0.0
- Changelog:
- 2026-02-22: Initial version with complete template structure
Converted and distributed by TomeVault — claim your Tome and manage your conversions.