control-mapper

name	control-mapper
description	Map security controls between different compliance frameworks including NIST 800-53, ISO 27001, CIS Controls, PCI-DSS, HIPAA, SOC 2, and CMMC. Use this skill for gap analysis, multi-framework compliance, and control rationalization. Use when this capability is needed.
metadata	{"author":"eucann"}

Control Mapper Skill

Map security controls between compliance frameworks to support multi-framework compliance programs and gap analysis.

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when you need to:

• Map controls from one framework to another
• Perform gap analysis across frameworks
• Rationalize controls for multiple compliance requirements
• Identify equivalent controls across standards
• Build unified control frameworks

Supported Frameworks

Framework	Code	Description
NIST 800-53	NIST-800-53	Federal security controls
NIST CSF	NIST-CSF	Cybersecurity Framework
ISO 27001	ISO-27001	International security standard
CIS Controls	CIS-Controls	Critical security controls
PCI-DSS	PCI-DSS	Payment card security
HIPAA	HIPAA	Healthcare security
SOC 2	SOC2	Service organization controls
CMMC	CMMC	DoD cybersecurity maturity

Mapping Types

Type	Confidence	Description
Exact	90-100%	Direct 1:1 mapping
Partial	70-89%	Covers most requirements
Related	50-69%	Conceptually similar

---

⛔ CRITICAL: Authoritative Data Requirement

Framework mappings require authoritative source documents. Do NOT use training knowledge to map controls between frameworks.

Why This Matters

• Incorrect mappings cause audit failures
• Framework versions change (ISO 27001:2022 differs from 2013)
• Mappings have nuances that training data cannot capture accurately
• Compliance decisions based on bad mappings create legal liability

Required Documents for Mapping

Mapping Task	Required Source
NIST → ISO 27001	NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 mapping publication
NIST → CIS	CIS Controls mapping to NIST
NIST → PCI-DSS	PCI SSC mapping documentation
NIST → HIPAA	NIST crosswalk publications
Any framework mapping	Official mapping document from authoritative source

Authoritative Mapping Sources

1. NIST Publications — https://csrc.nist.gov/publications
2. CIS Controls Mapping — https://www.cisecurity.org/controls
3. PCI SSC — https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/
4. CSA Cloud Controls Matrix — https://cloudsecurityalliance.org/research/cloud-controls-matrix

Decision Tree

Need to map controls between frameworks?
                    │
                    ▼
    ┌───────────────────────────────┐
    │ Do you have the official      │
    │ mapping document?             │
    └───────────────┬───────────────┘
                    │
        ┌───────────┴───────────┐
        │                       │
        ▼                       ▼
    ┌───────┐               ┌───────┐
    │  Yes  │               │  No   │
    └───┬───┘               └───┬───┘
        │                       │
        ▼                       ▼
  Use the document         ⛔ STOP
  to create mappings       Request user provide
                          official mapping document

---

Example Mapping Format

The tables below show the output format only — not authoritative mappings. Actual mappings must come from official sources.

NIST 800-53 → ISO 27001 (Example Format)

NIST Control	ISO Control	Type	Source Document
AC-1	A.5.1	Partial	Requires mapping doc
AC-2	A.5.16	Exact	Requires mapping doc

⚠️ Note: ISO 27001:2022 uses different control numbering than 2013. Always confirm framework version.

---

How to Map Controls

Step 1: Identify Source Framework

Determine the framework you're mapping FROM.

Step 2: Identify Target Framework

Determine the framework you're mapping TO.

Step 3: Look Up Mappings

For each source control:

1. Find known mappings in mapping database
2. Identify target control(s)
3. Note mapping type and confidence

Step 4: Handle Gaps

If no mapping exists:

1. Analyze control requirements
2. Find conceptually similar controls
3. Mark as "related" with lower confidence
4. Note as potential gap

Gap Analysis Process

Step 1: List Source Controls

Get all controls from source framework that apply.

Step 2: Map to Target

For each source control, find target mappings.

Step 3: Identify Gaps

Controls without mappings or with only "related" mappings are gaps.

Step 4: Report Findings

GAP ANALYSIS REPORT
==================
Source: NIST 800-53 (Moderate Baseline)
Target: ISO 27001

Fully Mapped: 180 controls (85%)
Partially Mapped: 25 controls (12%)
Gaps: 7 controls (3%)

GAPS REQUIRING ATTENTION:
- SI-4(5): No ISO equivalent for automated alerts
- CA-7: Continuous monitoring not explicitly covered
...

Multi-Framework Mapping

When organization needs multiple frameworks:

Step 1: Choose Primary Framework

Usually the most comprehensive (often NIST 800-53).

Step 2: Map to All Targets

Create mappings from primary to each required framework.

Step 3: Build Control Matrix

Control ID	NIST	ISO	CIS	PCI
CTRL-001	AC-1	A.9.1	5.1	7.1
CTRL-002	AC-2	A.9.2	5.2	7.2
...

Step 4: Identify Rationalization Opportunities

Find controls that satisfy multiple frameworks with one implementation.

Output Format

When mapping controls, provide:

CONTROL MAPPING
===============
Source: AC-2 (Account Management) [NIST 800-53]

Target Mappings:
1. ISO 27001 A.9.2.1 - User registration and de-registration
   Type: Exact | Confidence: 95%
   Notes: Direct mapping for account lifecycle

2. CIS Controls 5.1 - Establish and Maintain Inventory of Accounts
   Type: Partial | Confidence: 80%
   Notes: Covers account inventory aspect
   Source: CIS Controls v8 Mapping to NIST 800-53

3. PCI-DSS 7.1 - Limit access to system components
   Type: Related | Confidence: 70%
   Notes: Access limitation focus differs
   Source: PCI SSC NIST Mapping Document

Example Usage

When asked "Map our NIST 800-53 controls to ISO 27001":

1. Check for mapping document — Do you have the official NIST-to-ISO mapping?
2. If NO: Request user provide the authoritative mapping document
3. If YES: Get list of implemented NIST controls from user's SSP
4. For each control, look up ISO mappings from the authoritative document
5. Group by mapping type (exact/partial/related)
6. Identify gaps (no mapping)
7. Provide mapping matrix with confidence levels and source citations

If No Mapping Document Available

I cannot create accurate control mappings without an authoritative mapping document.

To map NIST 800-53 to ISO 27001, I need:
• NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 to ISO 27001:2022 mapping document
• Or: CSA Cloud Controls Matrix (contains cross-framework mappings)

Please provide one of these documents, or I can help you locate official sources.

I will not create mappings from training data because:
• Compliance work requires authoritative, auditable sources
• Framework versions change and training data may be outdated
• Incorrect mappings create audit failures and security gaps

---

Converted and distributed by TomeVault — claim your Tome and manage your conversions.