القائمة
Evaluate whether a research paper fits NeurIPS, ICLR, ICML, MLSys, ASPLOS, CVPR, or adjacent venues based on contribution type, evidence, audience, novelty, experiment norms, and reviewer expectations.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Prepare artifact-evaluation submissions for ML and systems conferences, including artifact scope, installability, reproducibility claims, hardware needs, badges, expected runtime, and reviewer instructions.
Audit experiments for top ML, CV, systems, and architecture submissions, checking baselines, ablations, metrics, statistical strength, datasets, stress tests, failure cases, and claim coverage.
Build a top-conference paper strategy from raw results, including central claim, contribution framing, section outline, reviewer value proposition, and claim-evidence alignment.
Plan a top-conference rebuttal or author response by clustering reviewer comments, identifying misunderstandings, concessions, evidence, response priority, and camera-ready promises.
Simulate critical top-conference reviewers for a draft, producing likely strengths, weaknesses, score drivers, clarity objections, missing experiments, novelty concerns, and rebuttal-preparation notes.
Build and audit conference submission checklists for paper PDF, supplement, OpenReview/CMT metadata, anonymity, ethics, broader impact, reproducibility, author forms, and deadline readiness.
| name | venue-fit |
| description | Evaluate whether a research paper fits NeurIPS, ICLR, ICML, MLSys, ASPLOS, CVPR, or adjacent venues based on contribution type, evidence, audience, novelty, experiment norms, and reviewer expectations. |
| version | 0.1.0 |
Use this skill before committing to a target conference.
Return Venue-fit table, Best target, Backup targets, Fit risks, and
Required paper changes.
