Skip to main content

improve-codebase-architecture

Identifies architecture improvement opportunities and produces structured proposals. Use when reviewing system design, spotting structural issues, or planning architecture evolution.

معلومات المصدر

المستودع
wryenmeek/knowledgebase
آخر نشاط في المصدر
٢٥ أبريل ٢٠٢٦ في ١٦:٣٧
لغة SKILL.md المكتشفة
الإنجليزية
النجوم
١
التفرعات
٠

خيارات التثبيت

يُحدَّد Prompt الذي يراجع المصدر أولًا بشكل افتراضي. يمكنك التبديل إلى أمر مباشر أو تنزيل نسخة محلية.

مراجعة ملفات المصدر

اقرأ SKILL.md وأي ملفات مرافقة يعرضها SkillsMP قبل أن تقرر التثبيت.

عرض SKILL.md

SKILL.md
تعليمات المصدر · معاينة للقراءة فقط
name
improve-codebase-architecture
description
Identifies architecture improvement opportunities and produces structured proposals. Use when reviewing system design, spotting structural issues, or planning architecture evolution.
# Improve Codebase Architecture ## Overview Surface architecture improvement opportunities through structured analysis and produce actionable proposals as ADRs or GitHub Issues. ## When to Use - During code review when structural issues are spotted - When a module or subsystem has grown unwieldy - When planning the next phase of system evolution - When dependency patterns suggest coupling problems Doc-only workflow. ## Procedure 1. **Audit current state**: identify modules, dependencies, coupling patterns, and pain points. 2. **Classify improvement type**: - **Decomposition** — split a module that has too many responsibilities - **Consolidation** — merge redundant modules or eliminate duplication - **Interface cleanup** — clarify boundaries, reduce coupling - **Pattern alignment** — adopt a consistent pattern across modules 3. **Assess migration cost**: how much work to implement? What breaks during migration? 4. **Propose improvement**: create an ADR or GitHub Issue with: - Current state diagram (ASCII is fine) - Proposed state diagram - Migration path (incremental steps) - Risks and rollback plan 5. **Link to existing work**: reference related ADRs, issues, or prior refactoring. ## Verification 1. Proposal has current state, proposed state, and migration path. 2. Migration path is incremental (no big-bang rewrites). 3. Risks are identified with concrete mitigation steps.
عرض على GitHub