Skip to main content

qt-cpp-review

Invoke when the user asks to review, check, audit, or look over Qt6 C++ code — or suggest before committing. Runs deterministic linting (60+ rules) then six parallel deep- analysis agents covering model contracts, ownership, threading, API correctness, error handling, and performance. Reports only high-confidence issues (>80/100) with structured mitigations. Read-only — never modifies code.

معلومات المصدر

المستودع
x-tools-author/x-tools
آخر نشاط في المصدر
١١ مايو ٢٠٢٦ في ٠٧:٠٢
لغة SKILL.md المكتشفة
الإنجليزية
النجوم
١٬٠٩٩
التفرعات
٣١٦

خيارات التثبيت

يُحدَّد Prompt الذي يراجع المصدر أولًا بشكل افتراضي. يمكنك التبديل إلى أمر مباشر أو تنزيل نسخة محلية.

مراجعة ملفات المصدر

اقرأ SKILL.md وأي ملفات مرافقة يعرضها SkillsMP قبل أن تقرر التثبيت.

مستكشف الملفات
9 ملفات

عرض SKILL.md

SKILL.md
تعليمات المصدر · معاينة للقراءة فقط
name
qt-cpp-review
description
Invoke when the user asks to review, check, audit, or look over Qt6 C++ code — or suggest before committing. Runs deterministic linting (60+ rules) then six parallel deep- analysis agents covering model contracts, ownership, threading, API correctness, error handling, and performance. Reports only high-confidence issues (>80/100) with structured mitigations. Read-only — never modifies code.
license
LicenseRef-Qt-Commercial OR BSD-3-Clause
compatibility
Designed for Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, and similar agents.
disable-model-invocation
false
metadata
{"author":"qt-ai-skills","version":"2.0","qt-version":"6.x","category":"review"}
argument-hint
[framework]
# Qt Code Review A structured, read-only code review skill for Qt6 C++ code that combines deterministic linting with parallel agent-driven deep analysis across six focused domains. ## When to use this skill - When the user mentions review-related tasks: "review", "check", "audit", "look over", "code review", "sanity check" - Suggest running this skill **before committing** code - When the user asks to validate Qt6 C++ code quality ## Arguments - `/qt-cpp-review` — review using universal Qt6 C++ rules only - `/qt-cpp-review framework` — also apply Qt framework/module development rules (BC, exports, d-pointers, qdoc, QML versioning) ## Framework mode detection If `$ARGUMENTS` contains "framework", enable framework mode. If the argument is not passed, auto-detect by scanning the first few files in scope for framework signals. If **two or more** of the following are found, suggest to the user: "This looks like Qt framework/module code. Run `/qt-cpp-review framework` to also apply framework-specific rules (BC, exports, qdoc, QML versioning)?" **Framework signals** (any two = likely framework code): - `QT_BEGIN_NAMESPACE` / `QT_END_NAMESPACE` - `Q_CORE_EXPORT`, `Q_GUI_EXPORT`, `Q_WIDGETS_EXPORT`, or any `Q_*_EXPORT` macro - `#include <QtModule/private/*_p.h>` (private headers) - `Q_DECLARE_PRIVATE`, `Q_D()`, `Q_Q()` - `qt_internal_add_module` or `qt_add_module` in CMakeLists.txt - `sync.profile` or `.qmake.conf` in the repository root Do **not** auto-enable framework mode — only suggest it. Let the user confirm. When framework mode is enabled: 1. Pass `--framework` to the linter (if supported) 2. Load `references/qt-framework-checklist.md` alongside the universal checklist 3. Include framework rules in each agent's mission context ## Scope detection Detect the user's intended scope from their language: ### Diff/commit scope (narrow) Triggered by language like: "this commit", "these changes", "the diff", "what I changed", "my changes", "staged changes", "outstanding changes", "before I commit" **Action**: Run `git diff` (unstaged) and `git diff --cached` (staged) to obtain the changeset. If the user says "this commit", use `git diff HEAD~1..HEAD`. Review only the changed lines plus sufficient surrounding context (±50 lines) for understanding. Only report issues found in the changed lines — do not report issues in unchanged surrounding context. ### Codebase scope (wide) Triggered by language like: "review the codebase", "audit the project", "check the repository", "review src/", or when a specific file/directory path is given without commit language. **Action**: Glob for `*.cpp`, `*.h`, `*.hpp` files in the specified scope. Review all matched files. ## Execution order The review proceeds in three phases. **Never skip a phase.** ### Phase 1: Deterministic linting (scripts) Run the unified Python linter against the target files. Requires Python 3.6+ (no external dependencies). If Python is not available, warn the user and skip to Phase 2. ```bash python3 references/lint-scripts/qt_review_lint.py <files...> # If python3 is not found, fall back to: python references/lint-scripts/qt_review_lint.py <files...> ``` This single-pass scanner encodes all mechanically-checkable rules from the Qt review guidelines. It reads each file once and evaluates all rules per line. Output is deterministic and repeatable. The linter is authoritative — do not second-guess its output. Collect all output before proceeding to Phase 2. **Rule categories** (60+ checks): - **INC** (Includes) — ordering, qglobal.h, qNN duplication - **DEP** (Deprecated) — obsolete Qt/std class usage - **PAT** (Patterns) — anti-patterns (min/max, std::optional, NRVO, COW detach, etc.) - **MDL** (Model) — QAbstractItemModel contract (begin/end balance, dataChanged roles, flags, default: in data()) - **ERR** (Error Handling) — QFile::open, QJsonDocument::isNull, QNetworkReply::error, SSL, timeouts, arg() mismatch - **LCY** (Lifecycle) — deleteLater, Q_ASSERT side effects, null guards, unbounded containers, qDeleteAll depth - **API** (Naming) — get-prefix, enum hygiene, QList<QString> - **HDR/TMO/CND/VAL/TRN** — headers, timeouts, conditionals, value classes, ternary operator ### Phase 2: Agent-driven deep analysis (6 parallel agents) Launch six focused review agents in parallel. Name each agent descriptively when launching (e.g. "Agent 1: Model Contracts") to provide progress visibility. Each agent has a tight scope and a specific checklist. Agents are READ-ONLY — they must never edit or write files. **Tool-agnostic agent contract**: Each agent described below is a self-contained review mission. In Claude Code, launch them as general-purpose subagents. In other tools, implement each as whatever subprocess, prompt chain, or analysis pass the tool supports. The key requirement is that each agent: - Has read access to all source files in scope - Can search/grep the codebase to trace symbols - Reports findings in the structured format below - Applies confidence thresholds: >80 = confirmed finding, 60–79 = investigation target (max 10 total across all agents), <60 = suppress - Does NOT duplicate findings from Phase 1 lint output (pass lint output as context to each agent) See **Agent missions** below for the six agents. ### Phase 3: Consolidation and reporting Merge lint script output and all agent findings. Deduplicate (same file+line+issue = one finding). Apply confidence scoring. Format the final report using the output format below. ## Agent missions Launch all six agents in parallel. Pass each agent: 1. The list of files in scope 2. The Phase 1 lint output (so they skip already-flagged issues) 3. Their specific mission below Each agent should read all files in scope, then focus on its assigned categories. --- ### Agent 1: Model Contracts **Scope**: QAbstractItemModel signal protocol, role system, index validity, proxy model correctness. **Check for**: - `beginInsertRows`/`endInsertRows` balance — every structural model change (add/remove/move) must use the correct begin/end pairs. `layoutChanged` is NOT a substitute for insert/remove. - `roleNames()` returning roles that `data()` does not handle (missing switch cases, fall-through to default) - `dataChanged` emitted with empty roles vector (forces full refresh instead of targeted update) - `beginRemoveRows` called with `first > last` (edge case when container is empty — QAIM contract violation) - `flags()` returning inappropriate flags (e.g. `ItemIsEditable` for non-editable items) - `setData()` returning true without emitting `dataChanged` - Proxy models accessing source model internals instead of going through `data()`/`index()` API - Filter/proxy models using source-model indices to index into filtered containers (wrong index space) **References**: `references/qt-review-checklist.md` § Model Contracts --- ### Agent 2: Ownership & Lifecycle **Scope**: Memory ownership, parent-child, resource cleanup, Rule of Five, RAII correctness. **Check for**: - Structs/classes with raw pointers where `new` is visible and no corresponding `delete`/`deleteLater`/smart-pointer wrapping exists (Rule of Five violation) - Missing `deleteLater()` on QNetworkReply in finished handlers - `Q_ASSERT` wrapping side-effectful expressions (compiled out in release builds — the side effect disappears) - `Q_ASSERT` as the sole null guard (crashes in release) - Polymorphic QObject subclasses missing `Q_DISABLE_COPY_MOVE` - Polymorphic classes missing virtual destructor - QTimer/QObject created with `new` but no parent and no other lifecycle management (scope, smart pointer, explicit delete) - `QObject::connect()` called with potentially null sender/receiver outside a null guard (runtime warning) - `m_recentlyAccessed`-style tracking lists that maintain pointers to objects that may be deleted elsewhere (dangling) - Unbounded container growth (append without cap or trim) - Destructor not cleaning up owned children recursively - Abstract interfaces with no implementations beyond one class (YAGNI violation — codebase scope only) **References**: `references/qt-review-checklist.md` § Ownership & Lifecycle, § Polymorphic Classes, § RAII Classes --- ### Agent 3: Thread Safety **Scope**: Cross-thread QObject access, mutex consistency, signal emission from worker threads. **Check for**: - QObject member variables written from `QtConcurrent::run()` or `QThread` worker without synchronization (mutex, atomic, queued connection, or other thread-safe primitive) - Signals emitted from worker threads connected with `Qt::DirectConnection` (or explicit non-queued connections) to main-thread receivers - Model mutations (`addNote`, `removeRows`, etc.) from background threads - Shared containers (`QList`, `QHash`) modified from multiple threads without consistent synchronization - Non-atomic increment/decrement of shared counters (`m_operationCount++` from multiple threads) - QTimer or other QObject operations from non-owner thread **References**: `references/qt-review-checklist.md` § Thread Safety --- ### Agent 4: API, Naming & C++ Correctness **Scope**: Qt naming conventions, const-correctness, move semantics, enum hygiene, noexcept correctness. **Check for**: - `get`-prefix on mere getters (Qt reserves `get` for user interaction or out-parameter decomposition) - Non-const getter methods (especially Q_PROPERTY READ accessors — UB via meta-object system) - Missing `std::forward<T>()` on forwarding/universal references - `return std::move(localVar)` preventing NRVO - `const` local variable preventing implicit move on return (e.g. `const QJsonDocument doc(...); return doc;` forces copy) - `const` method returning mutable pointer through raw pointer indirection (`findById() const` returning `T*` lets callers mutate via a const accessor — const doesn't propagate through raw pointers) - `noexcept` on functions containing `Q_ASSERT` (incompatible — Q_ASSERT may throw for testing, noexcept terminates) - Unscoped enums without explicit underlying type - Missing trailing comma on last enumerator - `switch` over enum with `default:` label (suppresses -Wswitch) - `QList<QString>` instead of `QStringList` - Missing `const` on methods that don't modify state - Case-sensitive string comparison for user-facing sort - Duplicated validation logic across classes - `const QMetaObject::Connection` preventing handle cleanup **References**: `references/qt-review-checklist.md` § API & Naming, § Enums, § Methods, § Move Semantics, § Operators --- ### Agent 5: Error Handling & Validation **Scope**: Missing error checks, input validation, security. **Check for**: - `QFile::open()` return value ignored - `QJsonDocument::fromJson()` result not checked for `isNull()`/`isObject()` before use - `QNetworkReply::error()` not checked before `readAll()` - XML writer `hasError()` not checked after writing - Hardcoded `http://` instead of `https://` in URLs - No SSL error handling (`QNetworkAccessManager::sslErrors`) - No timeout on network requests (`setTransferTimeout`) - Negative values accepted where only positive are valid (e.g. timer intervals, font sizes) - No schema/version validation on imported data - No input length validation on imported/downloaded data (unbounded strings from untrusted sources) - `QString::arg()` with wrong placeholder count - `saveToFile()` returning true regardless of I/O errors - Inconsistent error reporting patterns across methods **References**: `references/qt-review-checklist.md` § Error Handling & Validation --- ### Agent 6: Performance & Code Quality **Scope**: Performance anti-patterns, dead code, unnecessary copies, code smells. **Check for**: - `QRegularExpression` constructed inside a loop (expensive compilation on every iteration) - `roleNames()` rebuilding QHash on every call (should cache) - Non-const range-for over COW-shared QList/QHash triggering unnecessary detach/deep-copy - Non-const `operator[]` on shared QHash (triggers detach) — use `.value()` for reads - Expensive operation before cheap early-exit check (wasted allocation) - Dead/unreachable code (functions never called, branches that are always true/false given preconditions) - Magic numbers without named constants - God classes violating Single Responsibility - Copy-pasted validation/logic across classes - Stale member caches not invalidated on model changes (e.g. search cache surviving data edits) - `QMap`/`QHash` iteration order nondeterminism when selecting a "best" or "first" entry (`.first()` changes if keys are added; use deterministic tie-breaking) - `QMap` for small fixed-size constant data (use array/switch) - Returning QList/container by value from frequently-called methods (implicit deep copy on every call — return const ref or cache) - Member variables maintained (appended, capped) but never read by any method (dead state — wasted CPU and memory) - Missing re-entrancy guard on methods that emit signals which could trigger re-entry - Setter silently resetting unrelated state without signal - Early return skipping status/signal updates **References**: `references/qt-review-checklist.md` § Performance & Code Quality --- ## Confidence scoring guidelines | Confidence | Meaning | Action | |------------|---------|--------| | 90–100 | Certain: direct rule violation with full symbol trace | Report as finding | | 80–89 | High: rule violation confirmed but edge case possible | Report as finding | | 60–79 | Medium: likely issue but cannot fully verify | Report as investigation target | | <60 | Low: suspicion only | Suppress entirely | **Investigation targets** are findings the agent believes are real but cannot fully verify — e.g. noexcept correctness requiring whole-program analysis, dead code that may have callers outside scope, or design-intent judgments like virtual access levels. These are presented in a separate section for human verification. Maximum 10 investigation targets per report, prioritized by confidence within the 60–79 band. ## Output format Present the final report as follows. Use exactly this structure. ``` ## Qt Code Review Report **Scope**: [diff: `git diff HEAD~1..HEAD` | files: <paths>] **Files reviewed**: N **Issues found**: N (M from lint, K from deep analysis) --- ### Lint findings For each lint finding: #### [L-NNN] <Short title> - **File**: `path/to/file.cpp:42` - **Rule**: <rule ID from checklist> - **Finding**: <what the script detected> - **Mitigation**: <what to do, in prose — no code patches> --- ### Deep analysis findings For each agent finding: #### [D-NNN] <Short title> - **File**: `path/to/file.cpp:42` - **Category**: <agent name: Model Contracts | Ownership & Lifecycle | Thread Safety | API & C++ Correctness | Error Handling | Performance & Quality> - **Confidence**: NN/100 - **Finding**: <description of the issue> - **Trace**: <how the issue was confirmed — which symbols were followed, what was checked> - **Mitigation**: <what to do, in prose — no code patches> --- ### Investigation targets (human verification needed) Findings the agent identified but could not fully verify. Maximum 10, sorted by confidence. These require human judgment. For each investigation target: #### [I-NNN] <Short title> - **File**: `path/to/file.cpp:42` - **Category**: <agent name> - **Confidence**: NN/100 - **Finding**: <what the agent suspects> - **Unverified because**: <what the agent could not confirm —
عرض على GitHub
ملف SKILL.md هذا كبير جدا، لذلك يعرض SkillsMP القسم الاول فقط هنا. عرض على GitHub