Skip to main content

planning

Create comprehensive implementation plans and write them to plan files. Use when the user asks for a plan, comprehensive plan, systematic workflow design, or wants decisions documented in a plan file.

معلومات المصدر

المستودع
xiaolai/vmark
آخر نشاط في المصدر
٢٢ أبريل ٢٠٢٦ في ٠٥:٢٢
لغة SKILL.md المكتشفة
الإنجليزية
النجوم
٨٢٤
التفرعات
١٣٢

خيارات التثبيت

يُحدَّد Prompt الذي يراجع المصدر أولًا بشكل افتراضي. يمكنك التبديل إلى أمر مباشر أو تنزيل نسخة محلية.

مراجعة ملفات المصدر

اقرأ SKILL.md وأي ملفات مرافقة يعرضها SkillsMP قبل أن تقرر التثبيت.

مستكشف الملفات
2 ملفات

عرض SKILL.md

SKILL.md
تعليمات المصدر · معاينة للقراءة فقط
name
planning
description
Create comprehensive implementation plans and write them to plan files. Use when the user asks for a plan, comprehensive plan, systematic workflow design, or wants decisions documented in a plan file.
# Planning Skill ## When to use Use this skill when the user asks for planning, a roadmap, a spec-to-implementation breakdown, or wants decisions documented. ## Modes Choose the lightest mode that meets the request. ### `quick-plan` Use when: - task is small/medium and non-breaking - no migrations and no multi-phase rollout Output: - 3–8 Work Items (WI-###), each with tests + acceptance ### `full-plan` (default) Use when: - migrations/persistence changes - API/contract changes (public tools, schemas, SDKs) - multi-phase roadmaps - performance-sensitive work Output: - structured plan sections (see “Plan file template”) ## Process 1. **Clarify outcomes** - Restate desired behaviors and constraints. - Identify ambiguities and propose defaults if the user doesn’t decide. - Capture **constraints & dependencies** (runtime versions, OS, external services, feature flags, required tools). - **Capture gaps**: list requirement/behavior gaps or missing decisions revealed here. 2. **Inventory current behavior** - Trace entry points → state/store → side effects → persistence. - List key files/modules and the invariants they rely on. - Note ownership/priority rules (windows, workspaces, files). - **Capture gaps**: list where current behavior diverges from the stated outcomes. 3. **Define target rules** - Convert outcomes into explicit rules and precedence. - For each rule, include: trigger/context, expected behavior, scope, constraints, and exclusions. - **Edge-case pass**: cover empty/none, invalid/malformed, boundary sizes, conflicting state, multi-surface coordination, persistence/restore, and I/O failures. - **Capture gaps**: list rules that lack implementation support or current behavior conflicts. - Create a **Decision Log**: - decision, options considered, rationale, and why alternatives were rejected. - Create an **Open Questions** list: - questions that block correctness, who decides, and what the default is if not decided. 4. **Structure the plan** - Break into Work Items (WI-###), each with: - **Goal** - **Acceptance (measurable)** (correctness + performance + UX where relevant) - **Tests (first)** (file names + test intent; unit/integration/e2e as applicable) - **Touched areas** (file paths + key functions/classes/symbols) - **Dependencies** (other WIs, external tools/services) - **Risks + mitigations** - **Rollback / revert strategy** - Add **priority + estimates** (S/M/L) and explicit ordering/dependencies between WIs. - **Capture gaps**: map each gap to at least one WI (or record as “out of scope”). - **Plan lint (required)**: - Sections present (Outcomes, Constraints, Current Behavior, Target Rules, Work Items, Testing). - WI numbering is sequential and referenced consistently. - Every WI includes tests + acceptance. 5. **Write the plan file** - Use the template at `templates/TEMPLATE.md` (bundled with this skill) if available, otherwise follow the structure above. - Write plans to `dev-docs/plans/YYYYMMDD-HHMM-<topic>.md`. - Always report the saved plan path. ## Testing Requirements - Every WI must include explicit tests to write **before** implementation (file names and test intent). - If tests cannot be written, call it out explicitly and propose the smallest test seam to enable them. - Include a **Testing Procedures** section in the plan with required commands and when to run them. - End the plan with a short **Manual Test Checklist**. ## Acceptance Criteria Guidance Acceptance must be **measurable and verifiable**: - Good: “Search returns v1 schema with `locator_v1` for every result (unit test).” - Bad: “Search feels better.” ## Plan → Verify Handoff (required) At the end of the plan, include: - Evidence to collect per WI (tests, logs, manual steps). - Any required fixtures or sample data. ## Migration / persistence requirements (when applicable) If the plan changes anything persisted (DB, on-disk cache, config files, APIs that clients store): - Add a **Data Model** section (tables/columns/keys, versions). - Add a **Migration Plan**: - forward migration steps - rollback steps - compatibility guarantees (old clients vs new server) - Add **Invariants + validation queries** (what to check post-migration). - Add a **Backfill / reindex** strategy if needed. ## Observability requirements (when applicable) If the plan touches indexing/search/performance-sensitive paths: - Define metrics (latency, throughput, memory, DB size growth). - Define where logs go and how to enable verbose tracing. - Add acceptance thresholds (e.g. “index 1000 docs < X minutes on machine Y”). ## Rollout requirements (when applicable) If behavior changes are user-visible or risky: - Add a **Rollout Plan** (feature flags, staged enablement, default-off vs default-on). - Define “kill switch” conditions and how to revert quickly. ## Output Requirements - Always produce a plan file and include its path in the response. - Ask at most 1–2 clarifying questions only when they change the rules.
عرض على GitHub