Skip to main content سوق المهارات اكتشف واستكشف مهارات الذكاء الاصطناعي التي بناها المجتمع.
المهن ذات الصلة SOC
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
عرض تفاصيل Prompt يتجاوز الأمر المباشر Prompt المخصّص للمراجعة. افحص المصدر قبل تشغيله.
npx skills add https://github.com/xjtulyc/awesome-rosetta-skills --skill development-economicsيبقى الأمر في سطر واحد. مرّر أفقيًا لمراجعته كاملًا قبل النسخ.
تفضّل نسخة محلية؟ نزّل الملفات المتاحة حاليًا لدى SkillsMP.
تحميل Zip جاري التحميل... المزيد من هذا المستودع Astronomical data analysis with astropy and astroquery — FITS I/O, WCS transforms, catalog cross-matching, aperture photometry, and CMB power spectra.
Seismological data analysis with ObsPy — FDSN waveform download, response removal, phase picking, moment tensor inversion, and seismicity mapping.
Download and analyze oceanographic data from Copernicus Marine Service and Argo floats using copernicusmarine, gsw, and xarray.
name development-economics description Use this Skill for development economics: LSMS data loading, RCT ITT analysis, Lee sharp bounds, covariate balance table, propensity score matching, and poverty indices (FGT).
tags ["economics","development","RCT","propensity-score-matching","poverty","LSMS"] version 1.0.0 authors [{"name":"awesome-rosetta-skills contributors","github":"@xjtulyc"}] license MIT platforms ["claude-code","codex","gemini-cli","cursor"] dependencies {"python":["statsmodels>=0.14","pandas>=1.5","numpy>=1.23","scipy>=1.9","scikit-learn>=1.2","matplotlib>=3.6"]} last_updated 2026-03-18 status stable
Development Economics Analysis
TL;DR — Analyze RCT data with ITT regressions, test covariate balance with
love plots, correct for selective attrition using Lee bounds, estimate treatment
effects using propensity score matching, and compute FGT poverty indices from
household survey data.
When to Use
Situation Recommended Method Randomized control trial — intention to treat OLS with strata fixed effects RCT with partial compliance — LATE IV regression (treatment assignment as instrument) Systematic attrition may bias estimates Lee (2009) sharp bounds Observational data with rich covariates Propensity score matching (PSM) Cross-country or household poverty measurement FGT poverty indices Validate randomization quality Covariate balance table + love plot
Background
Intent-to-Treat (ITT) in RCTs
The ITT estimator regresses the outcome on the randomly assigned treatment indicator
(not actual take-up), controlling for randomization strata:
Y_i = α + β_ITT Z_i + γ_s strata_i + ε_i
where Z_i ∈ {0, 1} is random assignment. β_ITT is the average effect of being offered
treatment, regardless of compliance.
Local Average Treatment Effect (LATE) via IV is the ITT scaled by the compliance
rate. Z_i instruments for D_i (actual treatment take-up):
LATE = ITT / (First Stage: E[D_i|Z_i=1] - E[D_i|Z_i=0])
Covariate Balance
Balance test: At baseline, treated and control groups should have similar means for all
pre-treatment covariates. The standardized mean difference (SMD) is:
SMD_k = (X̄_k^1 - X̄_k^0) / SD_pooled_k
Conventional threshold: |SMD| < 0.10 (Rosenbaum and Rubin 1985). A love plot displays
all SMDs graphically.
Lee (2009) Sharp Bounds for Selective Attrition
If attrition is higher in treatment or control, the missing data may be non-random
(individuals who benefit more may be more likely to remain in the sample). Lee bounds
provide sharp bounds on the treatment effect by trimming the tails:
Upper bound: Trim the bottom (1 - p_min/p_max) fraction from the high-attrition group.
Lower bound: Trim the top (1 - p_min/p_max) fraction from the high-attrition group.
where p_0 and p_1 are retention rates in control and treatment groups respectively.
Propensity Score Matching
PSM constructs a counterfactual by matching each treated unit to the most similar
control unit based on the propensity score e(X) = P(D=1|X).
Estimate logistic propensity score.
Check common support (overlap).
Match using nearest-neighbor within a caliper (e.g., 0.25 × SD(log-odds)).
Assess balance after matching.
Estimate ATT = E[Y_i(1) - Y_i(0) | D_i = 1] on matched sample.
FGT Poverty Indices Foster-Greer-Thorbecke (1984) family of poverty measures:
P_α = (1/n) Σ_{i: y_i < z} [(z - y_i) / z]^α
α = 0: P_0 = headcount ratio (share below poverty line)
α = 1: P_1 = poverty gap (average shortfall as share of poverty line)
α = 2: P_2 = poverty severity (gives more weight to the poorest)
Environment Setup conda create -n devecono python=3.11 -y
conda activate devecono
pip install statsmodels>=0.14 pandas>=1.5 numpy>=1.23 scipy>=1.9 scikit-learn>=1.2 matplotlib>=3.6
python -c "import statsmodels, sklearn; print('OK')"
Core Workflow
Step 1 — ITT Regression and Covariate Balance import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import statsmodels.api as sm
from scipy import stats
np.random.seed(42 )
def generate_rct_data (
n: int = 1200 ,
n_strata: int = 6 ,
attrition_rate: float = 0.15 ,
true_itt: float = 0.3 ,
) -> pd.DataFrame:
"""
Simulate an RCT dataset with stratified randomization and selective attrition.
Args:
n: Total sample size.
n_strata: Number of randomization strata.
attrition_rate: Overall attrition fraction (higher for treated group).
true_itt: True ITT effect size.
Returns:
DataFrame with columns: id, strata, Z (assignment), D (take-up),
age, female, baseline_y, endline_y (NaN if attrited).
"""
strata = np.random.randint(0 , n_strata, n)
Z = np.zeros(n, dtype=int )
for s in range (n_strata):
idx = np.where(strata == s)[0 ]
np.random.shuffle(idx)
Z[idx[:len (idx) // 2 ]] = 1
age = np.random.normal(35 , 8 , n)
female = np.random.binomial(1 , 0.55 , n)
baseline_y = np.random.normal(1000 , 200 , n) + 50 * age * 0.01
D = np.where(Z == 1 , np.random.binomial(1 , 0.8 , n), 0 )
attrit_prob_control = attrition_rate * 0.5
attrit_prob_treat = attrition_rate * 1.5
attrit = np.where(
Z == 1 ,
np.random.binomial(1 , attrit_prob_treat, n),
np.random.binomial(1 , attrit_prob_control, n),
)
endline_y = baseline_y + true_itt * 1000 * Z + np.random.normal(0 , 150 , n)
endline_y = np.where(attrit == 1 , np.nan, endline_y)
return pd.DataFrame({
"id" : np.arange(n),
"strata" : strata,
"Z" : Z,
"D" : D,
"age" : age,
"female" : female,
"baseline_y" : baseline_y,
"endline_y" : endline_y,
"attrited" : attrit,
})
def covariate_balance_table (
df: pd.DataFrame,
treatment_col: str = "Z" ,
covariates: list = None ,
output_path: str = None ,
) -> pd.DataFrame:
"""
Compute standardized mean differences and produce a love plot.
Args:
df: RCT dataset.
treatment_col: Binary treatment assignment column.
covariates: List of covariate names to check.
output_path: If provided, save love plot.
Returns:
DataFrame with columns: covariate, mean_treated, mean_control, smd, p_value.
"""
if covariates is None :
covariates = ["age" , "female" , "baseline_y" ]
treated = df[df[treatment_col] == 1 ]
control = df[df[treatment_col] == 0 ]
records = []
for cov in covariates:
m1 = treated[cov].mean()
m0 = control[cov].mean()
s1 = treated[cov].std()
s0 = control[cov].std()
pooled_sd = np.sqrt((s1**2 + s0**2 ) / 2 )
smd = (m1 - m0) / (pooled_sd + 1e-10 )
t_stat, p_val = stats.ttest_ind(treated[cov].dropna(), control[cov].dropna())
records.append({
"covariate" : cov,
"mean_treated" : round (m1, 4 ),
"mean_control" : round (m0, 4 ),
"smd" : round (smd, 4 ),
"p_value" : round (p_val, 4 ),
"balanced" : abs (smd) < 0.10 ,
})
bal_df = pd.DataFrame(records)
print ("Covariate Balance Table:" )
print (bal_df.to_string(index=False ))
n_unbalanced = (abs (bal_df["smd" ]) >= 0.10 ).sum ()
print (f"\nUnbalanced covariates (|SMD| >= 0.10): {n_unbalanced} / {len (covariates)} " )
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(8 , max (4 , len (covariates) * 0.5 )))
colors = ["#E74C3C" if not b else "#2ECC71" for b in bal_df["balanced" ]]
ax.scatter(bal_df["smd" ], range (len (bal_df)), color=colors, s=80 , zorder=3 )
ax.axvline(-0.10 , color="gray" , linestyle="--" , linewidth=1 )
ax.axvline(0.10 , color="gray" , linestyle="--" , linewidth=1 , label="±0.10 threshold" )
ax.axvline(0 , color="black" , linewidth=0.8 )
ax.set_yticks(range (len (bal_df)))
ax.set_yticklabels(bal_df["covariate" ])
ax.set_xlabel("Standardized Mean Difference (SMD)" )
ax.set_title("Love Plot — Covariate Balance" )
ax.legend()
fig.tight_layout()
if output_path:
fig.savefig(output_path, dpi=150 )
print (f"Saved love plot to {output_path} " )
plt.show()
return bal_df
def itt_regression (
df: pd.DataFrame,
outcome: str = "endline_y" ,
treatment: str = "Z" ,
strata_col: str = "strata" ,
controls: list = None ,
) -> dict :
"""
ITT regression with strata fixed effects and optional covariate controls.
Args:
df: RCT dataset (complete cases for outcome).
outcome: Endline outcome column.
treatment: Random assignment indicator.
strata_col: Randomization strata column (included as dummies).
controls: Additional baseline controls for efficiency.
Returns:
Dictionary with keys: itt_coef, se, pvalue, ci, late_coef, result.
"""
dfc = df.dropna(subset=[outcome]).copy()
strata_dummies = pd.get_dummies(dfc[strata_col], prefix="strata" , drop_first=True )
X_cols = [treatment]
if controls:
X_cols += controls
X = pd.concat([dfc[X_cols], strata_dummies], axis=1 )
X = sm.add_constant(X)
model = sm.OLS(dfc[outcome], X.astype(float ))
result = model.fit(cov_type="HC3" )
itt = float (result.params[treatment])
se = float (result.bse[treatment])
pval = float (result.pvalues[treatment])
ci_low = float (result.conf_int().loc[treatment, 0 ])
ci_high = float (result.conf_int().loc[treatment, 1 ])
print (f"\nITT: {itt:.4 f} SE: {se:.4 f} p: {pval:.4 f} 95% CI: [{ci_low:.4 f} , {ci_high:.4 f} ]" )
if "D" in dfc.columns:
from statsmodels.sandbox.regression.gmm import IV2SLS
X_iv = sm.add_constant(pd.concat([dfc[["D" ] + (controls or [])], strata_dummies], axis=1 ).astype(float ))
Z_instr = sm.add_constant(pd.concat([dfc[[treatment] + (controls or [])], strata_dummies], axis=1 ).astype(float ))
iv_model = IV2SLS(dfc[outcome].values, X_iv.values, Z_instr.values)
iv_result = iv_model.fit()
late = float (iv_result.params[1 ])
print (f"LATE (IV): {late:.4 f} " )
else :
late = None
return {"itt_coef" : itt, "se" : se, "pvalue" : pval,
"ci" : (ci_low, ci_high), "late_coef" : late, "result" : result}
Step 2 — Lee Bounds for Selective Attrition def lee_bounds (
df: pd.DataFrame,
outcome: str = "endline_y" ,
treatment: str = "Z" ,
) -> dict :
"""
Lee (2009) sharp bounds for selective attrition.
Computes lower and upper bounds on the ATT when attrition is non-random.
Assumes: attrition in control is random; trims from appropriate tail in treatment.
Args:
df: Dataset with outcome (NaN = attrited) and treatment assignment.
outcome: Outcome column (NaN means attrited/missing).
treatment: Binary treatment assignment.
Returns:
Dictionary with keys: p0, p1, trim_fraction, lb_estimate,
ub_estimate, lb_se, ub_se.
"""
treated = df[df[treatment] == 1 ].copy()
control = df[df[treatment] == 0 ].copy()
p1 = treated[outcome].notna().mean()
p0 = control[outcome].notna().mean()
print (f"Retention rate: Treated = {p1:.4 f} , Control = {p0:.4 f} " )
trim_fraction = (p1 - p0) / p1 if p1 > p0 else (p0 - p1) / p0
y_treated_obs = treated[outcome].dropna().sort_values()
n_trim = int (np.ceil(trim_fraction * len (y_treated_obs)))
y_lower = y_treated_obs.iloc[n_trim:].values
y_upper = y_treated_obs.iloc[:len (y_treated_obs) - n_trim].values
y_control = control[outcome].dropna().values
lb_estimate = float (np.mean(y_lower) - np.mean(y_control))
ub_estimate = float (np.mean(y_upper) - np.mean(y_control))
n_boot = 500
lb_boots, ub_boots = [], []
for _ in range (n_boot):
y_tr_b = np.random.choice(y_treated_obs.values, size=len (y_treated_obs), replace=True )
y_ctrl_b = np.random.choice(y_control, size=len (y_control), replace=True )
y_tr_b_sorted = np.sort(y_tr_b)
lb_boots.append(float (np.mean(y_tr_b_sorted[n_trim:]) - np.mean(y_ctrl_b)))
ub_boots.append(float (np.mean(y_tr_b_sorted[:max (1 , len (y_tr_b_sorted) - n_trim)]) - np.mean(y_ctrl_b)))
lb_se = float (np.std(lb_boots))
ub_se = float (np.std(ub_boots))
print (f"\nLee Sharp Bounds (trim fraction = {trim_fraction:.4 f} ):" )
print (f" Lower bound: {lb_estimate:.4 f} (SE = {lb_se:.4 f} )" )
print (f" Upper bound: {ub_estimate:.4 f} (SE = {ub_se:.4 f} )" )
if lb_estimate > 0 :
print (" Both bounds positive — treatment effect significantly positive." )
return {
"p0" : p0,
"p1" : p1,
"trim_fraction" : trim_fraction,
"lb_estimate" : lb_estimate,
"ub_estimate" : ub_estimate,
"lb_se" : lb_se,
"ub_se" : ub_se,
}
Step 3 — Propensity Score Matching and FGT Poverty Indices from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression
from sklearn.neighbors import NearestNeighbors
def propensity_score_matching (
df: pd.DataFrame,
treatment_col: str = "Z" ,
outcome_col: str = "endline_y" ,
covariate_cols: list = None ,
caliper: float = 0.25 ,
) -> dict :
"""
Propensity score matching (nearest neighbor, 1-to-1, with caliper).
Args:
df: Dataset (complete cases).
treatment_col: Binary treatment indicator.
outcome_col: Outcome variable.
covariate_cols: Matching covariates (pre-treatment).
caliper: Caliper width = caliper × SD(logit propensity score).
Returns:
Dictionary with keys: att, se, n_matched, balance_after.
"""
dfc = df.dropna(subset=[outcome_col, treatment_col]).copy()
if covariate_cols is None :
covariate_cols = ["age" , "female" , "baseline_y" ]
X = dfc[covariate_cols].values
T = dfc[treatment_col].values
Y = dfc[outcome_col].values
lr = LogisticRegression(max_iter=500 , random_state=0 )
lr.fit(X, T)
ps = lr.predict_proba(X)[:, 1 ]
logit_ps = np.log(ps / (1 - ps + 1e-10 ))
caliper_width = caliper * np.std(logit_ps)
dfc["ps" ] = ps
dfc["logit_ps" ] = logit_ps
treated_idx = np.where(T == 1 )[0 ]
control_idx = np.where(T == 0 )[0 ]
nn = NearestNeighbors(n_neighbors=1 , metric="euclidean" )
nn.fit(logit_ps[control_idx].reshape(-1 , 1 ))
distances, indices = nn.kneighbors(logit_ps[treated_idx].reshape(-1 , 1 ))
matched_pairs = []
for i, (dist, ctrl_local_idx) in enumerate (zip (distances[:, 0 ], indices[:, 0 ])):
if dist <= caliper_width:
t_idx = treated_idx[i]
c_idx = control_idx[ctrl_local_idx]
matched_pairs.append((t_idx, c_idx))
n_matched = len (matched_pairs)
print (f"Matched pairs: {n_matched} / {len (treated_idx)} treated units" )
if n_matched == 0 :
print ("Warning: no matches within caliper. Widen caliper." )
return {"att" : np.nan, "se" : np.nan, "n_matched" : 0 , "balance_after" : None }
y_treated_matched = Y[[p[0 ] for p in matched_pairs]]
y_control_matched = Y[[p[1 ] for p in matched_pairs]]
diffs = y_treated_matched - y_control_matched
att = float (np.mean(diffs))
se = float (np.std(diffs) / np.sqrt(n_matched))
ci = (att - 1.96 * se, att + 1.96 * se)
print (f"ATT: {att:.4 f} SE: {se:.4 f} 95% CI: [{ci[0 ]:.4 f} , {ci[1 ]:.4 f} ]" )
return {"att" : att, "se" : se, "n_matched" : n_matched, "ci" : ci}
def fgt_poverty_indices (
income: np.ndarray,
poverty_line: float ,
alphas: list = None ,
) -> dict :
"""
Compute Foster-Greer-Thorbecke (1984) poverty measures.
Args:
income: Array of household income or consumption per capita.
poverty_line: Absolute poverty threshold (same units as income).
alphas: List of FGT alpha parameters. Default: [0, 1, 2].
Returns:
Dictionary with keys P0 (headcount), P1 (gap), P2 (severity),
poverty_line, n_poor, n_total.
"""
if alphas is None :
alphas = [0 , 1 , 2 ]
n = len (income)
poor = income < poverty_line
result = {"poverty_line" : poverty_line, "n_poor" : int (poor.sum ()), "n_total" : n}
for alpha in alphas:
gaps = np.maximum(0 , (poverty_line - income) / poverty_line)
p_alpha = float (np.mean(gaps ** alpha))
result[f"P{alpha} " ] = round (p_alpha, 6 )
print (f"\nFGT Poverty Indices (poverty line = {poverty_line} ):" )
print (f" P0 (headcount ratio): {result['P0' ]:.4 f} ({result['P0' ]*100 :.2 f} % below line)" )
print (f" P1 (poverty gap): {result.get('P1' , 'N/A' )} " )
print (f" P2 (poverty severity): {result.get('P2' , 'N/A' )} " )
print (f" Poor households: {result['n_poor' ]} / {n} " )
return result
Advanced Usage
Sensitivity Analysis: FGT Across Poverty Line Values def fgt_sensitivity (
income: np.ndarray,
poverty_lines: np.ndarray = None ,
alpha: int = 0 ,
output_path: str = None ,
) -> pd.DataFrame:
"""
Plot FGT P_alpha across a range of poverty lines for robustness.
Args:
income: Household income/consumption array.
poverty_lines: Array of threshold values. Default: 50th percentile ± 50%.
alpha: FGT parameter (0, 1, or 2).
output_path: If provided, save sensitivity plot.
Returns:
DataFrame with columns: poverty_line, p_alpha.
"""
if poverty_lines is None :
median_income = np.median(income)
poverty_lines = np.linspace(0.5 * median_income, 1.5 * median_income, 50 )
records = []
for z in poverty_lines:
gaps = np.maximum(0 , (z - income) / z)
records.append({"poverty_line" : z, "p_alpha" : float (np.mean(gaps ** alpha))})
df_sens = pd.DataFrame(records)
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(9 , 5 ))
ax.plot(df_sens["poverty_line" ], df_sens["p_alpha" ], color="#8E44AD" , linewidth=2 )
ax.set_xlabel("Poverty Line" )
ax.set_ylabel(f"P{alpha} " )
ax.set_title(f"FGT P{alpha} Sensitivity to Poverty Line Choice" )
fig.tight_layout()
if output_path:
fig.savefig(output_path, dpi=150 )
print (f"Saved FGT sensitivity plot to {output_path} " )
plt.show()
return df_sens
Troubleshooting Error / Issue Cause Resolution ITT coefficient imprecise (wide CI) Small sample or high variance outcome Use baseline covariate controls to reduce residual variance Lee bounds span zero Moderate attrition; ambiguous effect direction Improve study design to reduce attrition; report both bounds PSM few matched pairs Propensity scores outside common support Widen caliper; trim extreme propensity scores; check overlap plot PSM ATT biased after matching Poor covariate balance after matching Use genetic matching or reweighting (IPW) instead IV2SLS AttributeError Old statsmodels API change Use linearmodels.IV2SLS instead FGT P1/P2 undefined All income above poverty line Check poverty line choice; verify income units
External Resources
Lee, D.S. (2009). "Training, Wages, and Sample Selection." Review of Economic Studies , 76(3), 1071–1102.
Foster, J., Greer, J., Thorbecke, E. (1984). "A Class of Decomposable Poverty Measures." Econometrica , 52(3), 761–766.
Duflo, E., Glennerster, R., Kremer, M. (2007). "Using Randomization in Development Economics Research."
Handbook of Development Economics , Vol. 4.
World Bank LSMS data: https://microdata.worldbank.org/index.php/catalog/lsms
J-PAL methods guides: https://www.povertyactionlab.org/research-resources/research-methods
Examples
Example 1 — RCT ITT with Balance Check df = generate_rct_data(n=1500 , n_strata=6 , attrition_rate=0.15 , true_itt=0.3 )
bal = covariate_balance_table(df, treatment_col="Z" ,
covariates=["age" , "female" , "baseline_y" ],
output_path="love_plot.png" )
itt_out = itt_regression(df, outcome="endline_y" , treatment="Z" ,
strata_col="strata" , controls=["age" , "female" , "baseline_y" ])
print (f"True ITT = 0.3 × 1000 = 300.0 | Estimated ITT = {itt_out['itt_coef' ]:.2 f} " )
Example 2 — Lee Bounds + PSM + Poverty Indices df = generate_rct_data(n=2000 , attrition_rate=0.20 , true_itt=0.3 )
bounds = lee_bounds(df, outcome="endline_y" , treatment="Z" )
psm_out = propensity_score_matching(
df.dropna(subset=["endline_y" ]),
treatment_col="Z" ,
outcome_col="endline_y" ,
covariate_cols=["age" , "female" , "baseline_y" ],
caliper=0.25 ,
)
income = df["baseline_y" ].values
poverty_line = np.percentile(income, 40 )
fgt = fgt_poverty_indices(income, poverty_line)
fgt_sensitivity(income, alpha=0 , output_path="fgt_sensitivity.png" )
Changelog Version Date Change 1.0.0 2026-03-18 Initial release — ITT, covariate balance, Lee bounds, PSM, FGT poverty
