// Use when deciding which mw-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for 《管理世界》 (Management World). Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills.
Use when assembling the data-and-code replication package required by 《管理世界》 after conditional acceptance, drafting the README in Chinese, or auditing a deposit before editorial-office submission. Implements 《管理世界》"数据可获得性政策" (effective 2023, updated 2025), with explicit handling for CSMAR / Wind / 国泰安 等受限商业数据库 and Chinese government micro-data.
Use when the empirical identification strategy is the bottleneck for a Management-World manuscript — quasi-experimental designs (DID, IV, RDD, DML, event study) with Chinese policy shocks. Stress-tests the design before drafting tables.
Use when drafting or revising the institutional-background section of a Management-World manuscript, when the China policy timeline is unclear, or when reviewers ask for stronger institutional context.
Use when drafting or revising the literature-review section for a Management-World manuscript, when the Chinese / English reference balance is off, or when canonical Chinese references are missing.
Use when designing or writing mechanism tests and heterogeneity analyses for a Management-World empirical manuscript. Required for nearly all MW empirical submissions.
Use when drafting or strengthening the policy-implications section of a Management-World manuscript. Enforces layered (short / mid / long-term, micro / meso / macro) actionable recommendations.
| name | mw-workflow |
| description | Use when deciding which mw-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for 《管理世界》 (Management World). Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills. |
这是路由器，它不替代任何专用 Skill。它告诉你当前阶段应该用哪一个 mw-* skill。
默认假设：除非用户明确说明目标期刊不是《管理世界》，否则按 CSSCI / 北大核心 一区《管理世界》的编委口味处理。
| 当前症状 | 下一个 Skill |
|---|---|
| 选题想法模糊，不确定能否冲《管理世界》 | mw-topic-selection |
| 文献综述不知怎么平衡中外引用 | mw-literature-review |
| 政策背景没说清，海外读者视角不够 | mw-institutional-background |
| 实证只有 OLS，担心识别策略不过关 | mw-identification |
| 主结果有了，但缺机制 / 缺异质性切分 | mw-mechanism-heterogeneity |
| 表格列数过多 / 注释不规范 / 不像《管理世界》风格 | mw-tables-figures |
| 文末没有政策启示，或政策建议太空 | mw-policy-implication |
| 准备投稿，需要 checklist | mw-submission |
| 收到 R&R，需要写回复信 | mw-rebuttal |
| 条件录用后要交数据与代码复现包 | mw-replication |
对大多数实证投稿《管理世界》的稿件，按下列顺序：
mw-topic-selection — 先把"中国情境 + 边际贡献"句式定下来mw-literature-review — 中英文献综述并重mw-institutional-background — 政策 / 制度章节mw-identification — 准实验识别mw-mechanism-heterogeneity — 机制 + 异质性mw-tables-figures — 主表 / 主图最终化mw-policy-implication — 政策启示分层mw-submission — 投稿前 preflightmw-rebuttal — 外审后mw-replication — 条件录用后，向编辑部提交数据与代码包mw-topic-selectionmw-literature-reviewmw-institutional-backgroundmw-identificationmw-mechanism-heterogeneitymw-tables-figuresmw-policy-implicationmw-submissionmw-rebuttalmw-replicationmw-tables-figures 美化表格，如果识别策略还没立住mw-institutional-background 直接讲实证 —— 这是《管理世界》和 AER 最大的差异mw-rebuttal 在你修订正文之前生成回复信