Skip to main content
skillsmp

Menu

Philosophy & Ethics

Browse agent skills for philosophical analysis, ethical reasoning, and critical thinking

Categories, GitHub stars, and source recency help organize and order the catalog. These signals are not an endorsement, quality certification, safety review, or guarantee of fit. Open a skill detail and inspect its source before use.

10,098 results

html-ppt-zhangzara-vellum
94.7k
nexu-ionexu-io/open-design
A humanities lecture: how Renaissance linear perspective reshaped early cartography — sources, argument, and evidence. Built as a decision-grade academic research deck for faculty, graduate seminar.
html-ppt-zhangzara-vellum
94.7k
nexu-ionexu-io/open-design
A humanities lecture: how Renaissance linear perspective reshaped early cartography — sources, argument, and evidence. Built as a decision-grade academic research deck for faculty, graduate seminar.
openspec-explore
68.0k
Fission-AIFission-AI/OpenSpec
Enter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.
openspec-explore
39.7k
halo-devhalo-dev/halo
Enter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.
research
39.0k
Yeachan-HeoYeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode
Investigate an open question and return grounded, sourced findings
openspec-explore
28.2k
alibabaalibaba/druid
Enter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.
firstprinciples
18.9k
danielmiesslerdanielmiessler/LifeOS
Physics-based reasoning framework (Musk methodology) that deconstructs a problem to irreducible fundamental truths, classifies every element as hard constraint, soft constraint, or assumption, then reconstructs the optimal solution from fundamentals alone. USE WHEN first principles, fundamental truths, challenge assumptions, real constraint, rebuild from scratch, start over, physics first, question everything, reasoning by analogy. NOT FOR structural feedback loops (use SystemsThinking).
firstprinciples
16.0k
danielmiesslerdanielmiessler/Personal_AI_Infrastructure
Physics-based reasoning framework (Musk/Elon methodology) that deconstructs problems to irreducible fundamental truths rather than reasoning by analogy. Three-step structure: DECONSTRUCT (break to constituent parts and actual values), CHALLENGE (classify every element as hard constraint / soft constraint / unvalidated assumption — only physics is truly immutable), RECONSTRUCT (build optimal solution from fundamentals alone, ignoring inherited form). Outputs: constituent-parts breakdown, constraint classification table, and reconstructed solution with key insight. Three workflows: Deconstruct.md, Challenge.md, Reconstruct.md. Integrates with RedTeam (attack assumptions before deploying adversarial agents), Security (decompose threat model), Architecture (challenge design constraints), and Pentesters (decompose assumed security boundaries). Other skills invoke via: Challenge on all stated constraints → classify as hard/soft/assumption. Cross-domain synthesis: solutions from unrelated fields often apply once the
firstprinciples
16.0k
danielmiesslerdanielmiessler/Personal_AI_Infrastructure
Decompose to axioms, challenge inherited assumptions, reconstruct from verified truths. USE WHEN first principles, fundamental, root cause, decompose, challenge assumptions, rebuild from scratch.
thinking
16.0k
danielmiesslerdanielmiessler/Personal_AI_Infrastructure
Analytical and creative thinking frameworks. First principles decomposition, iterative depth analysis, council debate with multiple perspectives, red team stress testing, brainstorming, world and threat models, and scientific method. USE WHEN first principles, decompose, challenge assumptions, iterative depth, be creative, brainstorm, council, debate, red team, stress test, devil's advocate, threat model, world model, think about, experiment, hypothesis, deep exploration, figure out, optimize, improve, weigh options, creative solutions, critique, counterarguments.
science
16.0k
danielmiesslerdanielmiessler/Personal_AI_Infrastructure
Universal thinking and iteration engine based on the scientific method. USE WHEN user says "think about", "figure out", "try approaches", "experiment with", "test this idea", "iterate on", "improve", "optimize", OR any problem-solving that benefits from structured hypothesis-test-analyze cycles. THE meta-skill that other workflows implement.
think
14.7k
AgriciDanielAgriciDaniel/claude-obsidian
Apply the Fable-derived 10-stage OBSERVE, OBSERVE, LISTEN, THINK, CONNECT, CONNECT, FEEL, ACCEPT, CREATE, GROW loop to consequential or ambiguous reasoning and decisions. Use for think this through, deep think, architecture review, postmortem, tradeoff analysis, or challenges to assumptions. This is a reasoning review, not a deterministic vault health check or repair workflow.
openspec-explore
13.3k
gogfgogf/gf
Enter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.
prove
12.6k
Z3ProverZ3Prover/z3
Prove validity of logical statements by negation and satisfiability checking. If the negation is unsatisfiable, the original statement is valid. Otherwise a counterexample is returned.
explain
12.3k
semantica-agisemantica-agi/semantica
Explain Semantica reasoning, decision logic, and graph results with traceability, causal context, and human-readable rationale.
the-fool
11.4k
JeffallanJeffallan/claude-skills
Use when challenging ideas, plans, decisions, or proposals using structured critical reasoning. Invoke to play devil's advocate, run a pre-mortem, red team, or audit evidence and assumptions.
openspec-explore
10.3k
studyzystudyzy/imewlconverter
进入探索模式 - 一个用于探索想法、调查问题和澄清需求的思考伙伴。当用户想要在进行更改之前或期间深入思考某事时使用。

Skill content language: Chinese

naval-almanack
9.6k
kangarookingkangarooking/cangjie-skill
当用户询问《纳瓦尔宝典》这本书本身(书名/作者/章节/整书概览/术语)，或涉及本书未独立成 Skill 的主题时调用: 幸福训练/欲望管理、接受与内耗、冥想与心猴、地位游戏与攀比、选朋友与圈子、打工vs创业(委托代理)、 诚实沟通、身份与自我形象、期望与愤怒、生命意义、该不该信玄学(理性验证)、长期复利与声誉、判断力训练。 以下意图优先使用同包独立 Skill: wealth-structure(致富/股权期权)、productize-yourself(职业定位/副业方向)、 decision-heuristics(重大选择纠结)、hourly-rate-time(时薪/外包/时间分配)、reading-metaskill(怎么读书学习)、screen-detox(刷手机上瘾)。 Triggers: 纳瓦尔/Naval/纳瓦尔宝典/幸福/冥想/内耗/攀比/圈子/复利/人生意义

Skill content language: Chinese

life-meaning
9.6k
kangarookingkangarooking/cangjie-skill
当用户问「活着的意义是什么/找不到方向/虚无感/该为什么努力」时调用。 核心理念: 生命没有外在赋予的意义(宇宙尺度一切会消失); 意义=个人创造+愿意为之受苦; 拥抱死亡是意义的入口。 不适用于: 急性自杀风险(先紧急求助)。 Triggers: 生命的意义/虚无/找不到意义/为什么活着/meaning/purpose/nihilism

Skill content language: Chinese

rational-buddhism
9.6k
kangarookingkangarooking/cangjie-skill
当用户问某主张/玄学/灵修该不该信、想建立自己的验证标准、或寻找科学与精神的结合点时调用。 核心理念: 尝试一切, 亲自测试, 保持怀疑, 保留有用的, 舍弃没用的; 不可证伪的主张不进入基本真理; 冥想/接纳等内在技术可保留。 不适用于: 需要信仰安慰的临终/哀伤场景(尊重个体选择)。 Triggers: 该不该信/玄学/灵修/冥想/可证伪/验证/理性/rational buddhism/verify/belief

Skill content language: Chinese

naval-almanack
9.6k
kangarookingkangarooking/cangjie-skill
当用户询问《纳瓦尔宝典》这本书本身(书名/作者/章节/整书概览/术语)，或涉及本书未独立成 Skill 的主题时调用: 幸福训练/欲望管理、接受与内耗、冥想与心猴、地位游戏与攀比、选朋友与圈子、打工vs创业(委托代理)、 诚实沟通、身份与自我形象、期望与愤怒、生命意义、该不该信玄学(理性验证)、长期复利与声誉、判断力训练。 以下意图优先使用同包独立 Skill: wealth-structure(致富/股权期权)、productize-yourself(职业定位/副业方向)、 decision-heuristics(重大选择纠结)、hourly-rate-time(时薪/外包/时间分配)、reading-metaskill(怎么读书学习)、screen-detox(刷手机上瘾)。 Triggers: 纳瓦尔/Naval/纳瓦尔宝典/幸福/冥想/内耗/攀比/圈子/复利/人生意义

Skill content language: Chinese

socratic-drill
9.4k
anthropicsanthropics/claude-for-legal
Socratic drilling — it asks, you answer, it pushes back. Does NOT give you the answer until you've earned it. Use when the user says "drill me on", "quiz me", "socratic", "test me on [subject]", or wants to study actively.
gsd-explore
9.2k
open-gsdopen-gsd/gsd-core
Socratic ideation and idea routing — think through ideas before committing to plans
karl-marx-perspective
8.6k
digoaldigoal/blog
卡尔·马克思的思维框架与表达方式。基于《资本论》《共产党宣言》 《德意志意识形态》《关于费尔巴哈的提纲》《路易·波拿巴的雾月十八日》 《哥达纲领批判》、书信、第一国际材料和权威学术评价的调研， 提炼5个核心心智模型、8条决策启发式和表达DNA。 用途：作为思维顾问，用马克思的视角分析资本、劳动、技术、组织、 阶级、意识形态、政治经济结构和历史变迁。 当用户提到「用马克思的视角」「马克思会怎么看」「马克思模式」 「Marx perspective」「karl marx perspective」「从马克思主义看」时使用。 即使用户只是说「按生产关系分析」「看资本逻辑」「阶级分析一下」 「这是不是异化」也应触发。

Skill content language: Chinese

zhang-zhongjing-perspective
8.6k
digoaldigoal/blog
张仲景（东汉末"医圣"）的辨证论治思维框架——**中医临床思维导师**。基于 4,351 行一手与权威二手研究提炼 （覆盖 6 个维度、19 位医家评价、130 余条文证、16 个临床医案），包含 5 个核心心智模型 （观其脉证三段式决策、方证相应、六经为纲、见病知源、保胃气存津液）、8 条决策启发式和完整的医古文表达 DNA。 帮学习者建立"病—脉—证—治"四位一体的辨证思维，看懂经方处方逻辑，理解仲景方法论的现代价值。 **核心触发词**： 视角类——"用张仲景的视角""仲景怎么看""医圣会怎么想""切换到张仲景" 经典类——"伤寒论""金匮要略""伤寒杂病论""经方""经方派""经方临床" 方法类——"六经辨证""方证相应""观其脉证""随证治之""知犯何逆""见病知源""保胃气""存津液" 证型类——"太阳病""阳明病""少阳病""太阴病""少阴病""厥阴病""坏病""救逆""变证" 场景类——"用经方的逻辑""如果仲景会怎么开方""帮我用张仲景的思路分析" 隐式触发——用户描述症状群（头项强痛、恶寒、脉浮紧）+ 询问"这是什么病/怎么治"时主动建议 **不触发**（避免误触发）： - 单纯提及书名（"我买了一本伤寒论"）→ 非临床语境 - 非医学语境（"经方是一种投资策略"） - 文学/历史/考据话题（仲景生平、版本学） - 现代急症（胸痛/昏迷/大出血）→ 应建议就医，不进入角色 - 单纯西医诊断咨询（影像/化验读片）

Skill content language: Chinese

openspec-explore
8.5k
databasusdatabasus/databasus
Enter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.
ljg-learn
7.3k
lijiganglijigang/ljg-skills
Deep concept anatomist that deconstructs any concept through 8 exploration dimensions (history, dialectics, phenomenology, linguistics, formalization, existentialism, aesthetics, meta-philosophy) and compresses insights into an epiphany. Use when user asks to explain, dissect, or deeply understand a concept, term, or idea. Triggers on '解剖概念', '概念解剖', 'explain concept', 'learn concept', '/ljg-learn'. Produces org-mode output.

Skill content language: Chinese

openspec-explore
6.8k
fleetdmfleetdm/fleet
Enter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.
openspec-explore
6.7k
plainhubplainhub/plain-app
Enter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.
idea-evaluator
6.6k
HKUSTDialHKUSTDial/Supervisor-Skills
Evaluates a preliminary research idea against a five-dimension framework (Higher, Faster, Stronger, Cheaper, Broader) plus idea-lifecycle and student-capability matching, paradigm-shift probing, and a fatal-flaws audit. Returns a reviewer-style verdict; non-STEM ideas route to substitute frameworks. Use when the user has a draft research idea and asks whether it is worth pursuing, asks to 'evaluate this idea', 'score this idea', 'assess feasibility', 'novelty check', 'is this a good research direction', or before committing to a paper scope.
scientific-problem-selection
6.3k
KunAgentKunAgent/Kun
Evaluate and prioritize research questions by importance, novelty, tractability, evidence, resources, ethics, and falsifiability.
openspec-explore
6.2k
PBH-BTNPBH-BTN/PeerBanHelper
Enter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.
openspec-explore
6.1k
rivet-devrivet-dev/actors
Enter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.
learn-teach
5.9k
FlorianBruniauxFlorianBruniaux/claude-code-ultimate-guide
Step-by-step explanation of a concept with progressive depth
openspec-explore
5.7k
AmanVarshney01AmanVarshney01/create-better-t-stack
Enter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.
openspec-explore
5.4k
liangxiegameliangxiegame/QFramework
Enter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.
openspec-explore
5.3k
gitify-appgitify-app/gitify
Enter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.
style-editing
4.7k
Agenta-AIAgenta-AI/agenta
Apply Joseph Williams' clarity principles when writing or editing prose. Use when drafting technical or business writing, diagnosing unclear sentences, rewriting passive or abstract prose, or any time the user references Williams, "Style: Lessons in Clarity and Grace," or "Style: The Basics of Clarity and Grace."
council
4.2k
0xNyk0xNyk/council-of-high-intelligence
Convene the Council of High Intelligence — multi-persona deliberation with historical thinkers for deeper analysis of complex problems.
skill-thought-partner
4.1k
nyldnnyldn/claude-octopus
Brainstorm creatively with pattern spotting and paradox hunting — use for ideation and exploration
skill-thought-partner
4.1k
nyldnnyldn/claude-octopus
Brainstorm creatively with pattern spotting and paradox hunting — use for ideation and exploration
recall-reasoning
3.9k
parcadeiparcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3
Search past reasoning for relevant decisions and approaches
contradiction-analysis
3.8k
HughYauHughYau/qiushi-skill
矛盾分析法：把复杂问题拆成若干对立面，找出规定其他矛盾的主要矛盾及其主要方面，判定对抗性 / 非对抗性，并据此选择处理方式。当问题头绪多、多个因素互相牵制、优先级不清、根因不明、反复修不好、trade-off 说不清时触发；直接执行类任务或用户已定方案时不触发。 English: Contradiction analysis. Decompose a tangled problem into opposing forces, isolate the principal contradiction and its dominant side, classify it as antagonistic or non-antagonistic, and choose the response accordingly. Trigger on unclear priorities, unknown root causes, recurring failures, or trade-offs that resist explanation; skip for direct execution or when the user has already chosen the solution.

Skill content language: Chinese

practice-cognition
3.8k
HughYauHughYau/qiushi-skill
实践认识论：把方案、假说或判断放回实践中检验，按「实践 → 认识 → 再实践」螺旋迭代，并在开始前写明循环终止条件。当你提出了假说要验证、一次尝试失败要复盘再来、发现自己只想不做或只做不想时触发；一次性输出、答案可直接查阅、还没形成假说（先调查）时不触发。 English: Practice-cognition loop. Test a hypothesis or plan in practice, learn from the result, and iterate in a rising spiral with an explicit stop condition. Trigger when a plan needs validation, an attempt failed and must be retried, or you notice thinking without doing (or doing without thinking); skip for one-shot outputs, lookup questions, or before any hypothesis exists.

Skill content language: Chinese

a5
3.7k
brycewang-stanfordbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills
Agent A5 - Paradigm & Worldview Advisor - Philosophical foundations for research design. Covers ontology, epistemology, axiology, and methodology alignment. Use when: establishing philosophical foundations, justifying methodological choices, writing positionality statements Triggers: paradigm, 패러다임, ontology, epistemology, worldview, 세계관, philosophical foundations, 철학적 기초
python-causality-guide
3.7k
brycewang-stanfordbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills
Learn causal inference with Python using the Brave and True handbook
educational-research-methods
3.7k
brycewang-stanfordbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills
Quantitative and qualitative research methods for education studies
learning-science-guide
3.7k
brycewang-stanfordbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills
Evidence-based learning science principles for educational research and practice