forge-app-review

name

forge-app-review

description

Reviews Forge apps for security vulnerabilities, architecture issues, cost inefficiencies, performance problems, and trigger/scheduling waste before deployment. Use when the user says "review my Forge app", "check my app", "pre-deploy check", "is my app ready to deploy", "audit my Forge app", "check for security issues", "check performance", "review manifest", "check my Forge app for problems", "app review", "optimize my Forge app costs", "reduce invocations", "why is my app expensive", "check my triggers", or any request to evaluate a Forge app's quality, safety, cost efficiency, or readiness. Also triggers when users ask about Forge best practices, permission scopes, resolver optimization, storage efficiency, cold start reduction, frontend offloading, trigger filtering, scheduled trigger frequency, N+1 API calls, bulk API usage, verbose logging, or Forge platform pricing.

Forge App Review

Deep pre-deploy review of Forge apps across Security, Architecture, Cost, Performance, and Triggers & Scheduling. Produces a severity-sorted issue list with actionable fixes.

Forge Pricing Reference

Forge uses a consumption-based pricing model. Charges only apply above free monthly allowances. Use this table to assess cost impact of findings:

Capability	Billing Unit	Free Monthly Allowance	Overage Price (USD)
Functions: Duration	GB-seconds	100,000 GB-seconds	$0.000025 / GB-second
KVS: Reads	GB read	0.1 GB	$0.055 / GB
KVS: Writes	GB written	0.1 GB	$1.090 / GB
Logs: Writes	GB written	1 GB	$1.005 / GB
SQL: Compute duration	Hours	1 hour	$0.143 / hour
SQL: Compute requests	Per 1M requests	100,000 requests	$1.929 / 1M requests
SQL: Data stored	GB-hours	730 GB-hours	$0.00076850 / GB-hour

Key cost insight: KVS writes are ~20× more expensive than reads. Logging is ~$1/GB over the free tier. The cost formula for functions is: GB-seconds = (memoryMiB ÷ 1024) × duration in seconds.

Free capabilities (not billed): UI modules (UI Kit and Custom UI frontends run in the browser), Jira expressions, Forge Remote invocations (though the remote function runtime is billed), entity properties (stored by the product, not by Forge Storage).

---

Execution Mandate

When triggered, immediately:

1. Read manifest.yml — this is the source of truth for permissions, modules, egress, triggers, scheduled triggers, and function memory settings
2. Read package.json — check dependencies, versions, scripts
3. Scan all resolver files in src/ — check patterns, error handling, data flow, API call patterns (N+1, missing fields, sequential calls), logging verbosity
4. Scan UI code (Custom UI or UI Kit) — check component patterns, bridge usage, whether API calls and logic could be moved to the frontend, product context usage, invoke patterns (chatty, per-render)
5. Check for Forge Storage / Entity Store usage patterns — TTL strategy, write frequency, query vs iteration, entity properties vs KVS
6. Check trigger and scheduling configuration — frequency, filtering, ignoreSelf, early exit, polling vs event-driven
7. Check for Forge Remote usage or opportunities — compute offloading, trade-offs
8. Compile all findings into a severity-sorted issue list

Do NOT ask the user what to review. Review everything. Do NOT modify any code unless explicitly asked. Do NOT skip categories — even if the app looks clean, confirm it explicitly.

---

Review Process

Step 1: Manifest Analysis (manifest.yml)

Read the manifest first. Extract:

• Permissions/scopes — list all scopes and permissions entries
• Modules — list all module types and their function key references
• Egress — check app.connect.remotes or permissions.external.fetch.backend URLs
• Environment variables — check for app.storage or environment variable declarations

Cross-reference every function key in modules against actual resolver resolver.define() calls.

Step 2: Dependencies (package.json)

Check:

• Node.js engine compatibility (Forge requires Node 18.x+)
• Unnecessary large dependencies (e.g., lodash when only one function is used, moment instead of native Date or dayjs)
• Missing @forge/api, @forge/bridge, or @forge/ui depending on app type
• Dev dependencies leaking into production
• Outdated @forge/* packages

Step 3: Resolver Code

Read all files that contain resolver.define or Resolver imports. Check for:

• Error handling patterns
• API call patterns (requestJira, requestConfluence, api.asUser(), api.asApp())
• Data validation and sanitization
• Storage operations
• External fetch calls

Step 4: UI Code

For UI Kit apps — scan for @forge/react imports, component usage, hooks. For Custom UI apps — scan for @forge/bridge usage, invoke() calls, CSP compliance.

In both cases, check for:

• Frontend offloading opportunities: Are there resolvers that only do read-only requestJira()/requestConfluence() calls that could instead use @forge/bridge directly from the browser?
• Product context via resolver: Is the app invoking a resolver just to get issue/project/space key? Use useProductContext() (UI Kit) or view.getContext() (Custom UI) instead.
• Invoke on every render: Is invoke() called without proper useEffect with empty dependency array, causing re-invocation on every render?
• Client-side logic: Is data formatting, sorting, filtering, or validation done in a resolver when it could run in the browser for free?

Step 5: Storage Analysis

Search for usage of:

• storage.get, storage.set, storage.delete — check for unnecessary writes, short TTLs (KVS writes are ~20× more expensive than reads), and missing caching patterns
• storage.query (Entity Store) — check for proper use of indexes, .where(), and .limit() instead of fetching all items and filtering in code
• Entity properties (requestJira to /properties/) — note these are free and stored by the product (not Forge Storage quota), suitable for small per-entity metadata (max 32 KB per property). Good for flags, markers, timestamps attached to Jira issues or Confluence pages. Queryable via JQL for Jira entity properties. Not suitable for sensitive data — visible to other apps and users via REST API.
• Cache patterns — is app-level data that rarely changes (e.g., custom field IDs, project configs, workflow statuses) being fetched from APIs on every invocation? Should be cached in KVS with a TTL (1 hour+ preferred to minimize writes)
• Write amplification — a 1-minute TTL cache with 100 calls/hour causes ~60 writes/hour; a 1-hour TTL causes ~1 write/hour at ~60× less cost

Step 6: Trigger & Scheduling Analysis

Check the manifest for scheduledTrigger and trigger modules:

• Scheduled triggers: Is the interval appropriate? (fiveMinutes is rarely justified — prefer hour, day, or week)
• Polling vs events: Is a scheduled trigger polling for changes that could be caught by a product event trigger?
• Event filtering: Do product event triggers have filter.expression to limit invocations to relevant events?
• ignoreSelf: If the app writes to entities and listens to events on those entities, is filter.ignoreSelf: true set? (Jira only)
• Early exit: Do trigger handler functions check for work to do before running expensive operations?
• External polling: Could scheduled triggers polling external services be replaced with web triggers?

Step 7: Forge Remote Analysis

Check if the app uses Forge Remote (remotes: section in manifest):

• If present, note that Forge Remote offloads compute to an external backend — the Forge function is not executed for those calls, saving FaaS invocations. But the app loses "Runs on Atlassian" eligibility.
• If not present, check whether the app would benefit from Forge Remote:
  • Compute-intensive operations (ML inference, image processing, complex report generation)
  • Long-running operations that approach the 25-second function timeout
  • Existing backend services the app duplicates logic from
  • Large-scale storage needs exceeding Forge Storage limits
• Note: For most apps, staying on-platform is simpler. Only recommend Forge Remote when there's a genuine need.

Step 8: Compile Findings

Produce a single issue list sorted: Critical → Warning → Info.

---

Security Checks

ID	Check	Severity	What to Look For
SEC-01	Overly broad scopes	Critical	read:jira-work when only read:jira-work:jira (granular) is needed. Any write: scope that isn't actually used in code. Any manage: or admin: scope.
SEC-02	Missing egress restrictions	Critical	External fetch() calls in resolvers without matching permissions.external.fetch.backend entries in manifest. Wildcard egress domains (*).
SEC-03	Hardcoded secrets	Critical	API keys, tokens, passwords, or credentials in source code instead of using Forge environment variables (process.env.FORGE_* or getAppEnvironmentVariable()).
SEC-04	Missing input sanitization	Critical	User-provided data passed directly to API calls, storage keys, or rendered in Custom UI without sanitization. SQL/NoSQL injection patterns in storage queries.
SEC-05	Unsafe Custom UI CSP	Warning	unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval, or overly broad connect-src in Custom UI resource configuration.
SEC-06	Missing auth checks	Warning	Resolvers that don't verify user context before performing write operations. Missing context.accountId validation.
SEC-07	Sensitive data in storage	Warning	PII, tokens, or credentials stored in Forge Storage without encryption or with overly broad access.
SEC-08	Excessive permissions	Warning	permissions.scopes includes scopes not referenced by any API call in the codebase. Every scope should have a matching API usage.
SEC-09	Classic scopes used	Info	Using classic (coarse-grained) scopes like read:jira-work instead of granular scopes like read:jira-work:jira. Granular scopes are preferred.
SEC-10	Unnecessary asApp() usage	Warning

---

Architecture Checks

ID	Check	Severity	What to Look For
ARC-01	Function key mismatch	Critical	resolver.define('functionName') doesn't match the function key in manifest.yml modules.
ARC-02	Monolithic resolver	Warning	Single resolver file with 5+ resolver.define() calls handling unrelated functionality. Split into separate files by domain.
ARC-03	Missing error handling	Warning	resolver.define() callbacks without try-catch. API calls (requestJira, requestConfluence) without .catch() or error status checks.
ARC-04	Incorrect API usage	Warning	Using api.asApp() when api.asUser() is appropriate (or vice versa). Missing response.json() parsing. Not checking response.ok or response.status.
ARC-05	Module type mismatch	Warning	Using a jira:issuePanel module for content that should be a jira:issueGlance or jira:issueContext. Module type should match UX intent.
ARC-06	Missing resolver validation	Warning	Resolver accepts payload from UI but doesn't validate shape/types before processing.
ARC-07	Poor code organization	Info	All code in a single file. No separation between API logic, business logic, and data access.
ARC-08	Unused modules	Info	Modules defined in manifest.yml that have no corresponding UI or resolver implementation.
ARC-09	Missing TypeScript	Info	JavaScript used instead of TypeScript. TypeScript catches many issues at build time.
ARC-10	Forge Remote trade-offs not considered	Info	App uses Forge Remote (remotes: in manifest) but may not need it — Forge Remote makes the app ineligible for "Runs on Atlassian" status and requires operating your own infrastructure (patching, uptime, incident response). Only use when on-platform capabilities are genuinely insufficient (compute-intensive tasks, >25s timeout needs, existing backend integration, storage limits exceeded).

---

Cost Checks

ID	Check	Severity	What to Look For
CST-01	Chatty resolvers	Warning	UI making multiple invoke() calls on load when data could be batched into a single resolver call. Each invocation counts toward Forge function invocation limits and GB-seconds.
CST-02	No pagination / missing maxResults	Warning	Product API calls (e.g., search issues, get pages) without maxResults/limit parameters or pagination handling. Fetching default page sizes (often 50–100) when only a few results are needed wastes bandwidth and function duration. Always pass explicit maxResults matched to actual need. Conversely, when you DO need all results, use the maximum allowed page size (e.g., maxResults=100 for Jira search) to minimize the number of paginated round-trips — fewer requests means shorter function duration.
CST-03	Unnecessary storage ops	Warning	Reading the same storage key multiple times in a single invocation. Writing to storage on every invocation when data hasn't changed. KVS writes are ~20× more expensive than reads — minimize write frequency. Short TTL caches (e.g., 1-minute TTL) cause excessive writes; prefer longer TTLs (1 hour+) where data allows.
CST-04	Bloated bundle	Warning	Dependencies that significantly increase bundle size: lodash (use lodash-es or individual imports), moment (use dayjs or date-fns), axios (use native fetch).
CST-05	Redundant API calls	Warning	Fetching the same data from product APIs multiple times in one resolver execution. Cache results in variables.
CST-06	Logic in resolver that could run client-side	Warning	Data formatting, sorting, filtering, validation, or transformation done in a resolver when it could run in the browser for free. UI Kit and Custom UI frontends run entirely in the browser and are not subject to function invocation costs. Look for resolvers that only reshape data — move that logic to the frontend.
CST-07	Resolver used for product context	Warning	Invoking a resolver just to get the current issue key, project key, or space key. UI Kit apps should use from ; Custom UI apps should use from . These provide context directly in the browser with no function invocation.

---

Trigger & Scheduling Checks

ID	Check	Severity	What to Look For
TRG-01	Excessive scheduled trigger frequency	Warning	Scheduled triggers using interval: fiveMinutes or interval: hour when the data they process changes less frequently. Ask: how often does the underlying data actually change? Prefer day or week intervals unless sub-hourly freshness is genuinely required.
TRG-02	Polling instead of event triggers	Warning	Scheduled triggers that poll for changes (e.g., checking if issues were updated) instead of using product event triggers (avi:jira:updated:issue, etc.) that fire only when the event actually occurs. Replace polling with event-driven triggers to eliminate empty invocations.
TRG-03	Missing trigger event filters	Warning	Product event triggers without a filter expression in the manifest. Without filtering, the function is invoked for every matching event across the entire site. Use manifest-level filter.expression to restrict invocations to specific projects, issue types, or conditions.
TRG-04	Missing ignoreSelf on triggers	Warning	App that writes to Jira entities AND listens to events on those same entities, without filter.ignoreSelf: true in the manifest. This causes feedback loops where the app's own updates trigger its own handler. (Jira events only — not yet supported for Confluence.)
TRG-05	No early exit in trigger handler	Info	Trigger handler functions that don't check whether there is real work to do before performing expensive operations. Add a lightweight guard at the top of the function (e.g., check a timestamp, check event fields) and return early if no action is needed.
TRG-06	Polling external service instead of web trigger	Info	Scheduled trigger polling an external service for updates. Consider replacing with a Forge web trigger — register the web trigger URL as a webhook with the external service so it calls you only when something changes.

---

Performance Checks

ID	Check	Severity	What to Look For
PRF-01	Sequential API calls	Warning	Multiple independent API calls made with await one after another instead of Promise.all() or Promise.allSettled(). Parallel duration ≈ slowest single call vs sequential duration = sum of all calls. Limit parallelism to 5–10 concurrent requests to avoid HTTP 429 rate limits — batch the rest.
PRF-02	Cold start imports	Warning	Heavy libraries imported at the top level of resolver files. Use dynamic import() inside resolver handlers for rarely-used heavy dependencies.
PRF-03	Missing loading states	Warning	UI Kit: No <Spinner> or loading indicator while resolver data is being fetched. Custom UI: No loading state while invoke() is pending.
PRF-04	Large storage entities	Warning	Storing large objects (>100KB) in a single Forge Storage key. Split into smaller chunks or use Entity Store with indexed queries.
PRF-05	Blocking resolver logic	Warning	CPU-intensive operations (JSON parsing of large payloads, complex string manipulation, sorting large arrays) in resolvers without consideration of the 25-second timeout.
PRF-06	Storage iteration instead of query	Warning	Fetching all items from Forge Storage via storage.query().getMany() and filtering in code. Use storage.query() with indexes, .where(), and .limit() to push filtering to the storage layer. This reduces KVS read volume and function compute time.
PRF-07	No caching of stable data	Warning	Repeated product API calls for data that rarely changes (e.g., custom field IDs, project metadata, workflow statuses) without any caching strategy. Cache in Forge Storage with a TTL (1 hour+ recommended). Use entity properties (free, stored by the product) for small per-entity data that doesn't need Forge Storage quota.
PRF-08	Unnecessary re-renders	Info	UI Kit: State updates in loops or effects that trigger excessive re-renders. Custom UI: Missing useMemo/useCallback for expensive computations.

---

Output Format

ALWAYS present findings as a single flat list sorted by severity (Critical first, then Warning, then Info). Do NOT group issues by category — interleave categories within the severity-sorted list. Use this template:

## Forge App Review Results

### Summary
- 🔴 Critical: X issues
- 🟡 Warning: Y issues
- 🔵 Info: Z issues

### Issues

🔴 **SEC-01: Overly broad scopes**
  Location: `manifest.yml` line ~X
  Detail: Scope `write:jira-work` is declared but only `read:issue:jira` is used in resolvers.
  Fix: Replace with granular scope `read:issue:jira`. Remove unused write scope.

🟡 **PRF-01: Sequential API calls**
  Location: `src/resolvers/index.js` line ~Y
  Detail: Three `requestJira` calls awaited sequentially. These are independent and can run in parallel.
  Fix: Wrap in `Promise.all([call1, call2, call3])`.

🔵 **ARC-09: Missing TypeScript**
  Location: Project root
  Detail: Project uses JavaScript. TypeScript would catch type errors at build time.
  Fix: Consider migrating to TypeScript. Run `forge create` with TypeScript template for reference.

When no issues are found in a category, explicitly state it:

✅ **Security**: No issues found
✅ **Triggers & Scheduling**: No issues found (or: No triggers defined)

---

Anti-Patterns — Do NOT Do These

• Do NOT modify code unless the user explicitly asks for fixes
• Do NOT skip reading manifest.yml — it is the foundation of the review
• Do NOT guess about permissions — cross-reference every scope against actual API calls in code
• Do NOT report issues without a specific file/line location when possible
• Do NOT combine multiple issues into one finding — each gets its own entry
• Do NOT only check one category — always review all five (Security, Architecture, Cost, Performance, Triggers & Scheduling)
• Do NOT suggest adding dependencies to fix issues — prefer built-in solutions
• Do NOT report issues about test files or dev tooling unless they affect production

---

Edge Cases

Minimal App (Hello World)

If the app is very simple (1 module, 1 resolver, minimal UI), still run all checks but expect mostly clean results. Report Info-level suggestions for future growth (e.g., "Consider TypeScript as the app grows").

Custom UI vs UI Kit

Detect which type by checking:

• UI Kit: imports from @forge/react, uses ForgeReconciler, JSX with Forge components
• Custom UI: has a static/ directory or resources in manifest, imports from @forge/bridge
• Both: some apps use both — check each separately

Monorepo / Multi-Module

If the manifest declares multiple modules, trace each module's function key to its resolver independently. Don't assume all modules share the same issues.

No Manifest Found

If manifest.yml doesn't exist in the workspace, stop and tell the user: "No manifest.yml found. Are you in the correct Forge app directory?" Do NOT proceed without the manifest.