portfolio-matrix

name	portfolio-matrix
description	Evaluate strategic options by NPV vs ease of implementation. Use for project prioritization, resource allocation, and strategic decision making.

Portfolio Matrix

Metadata

• Name: portfolio-matrix
• Description: Strategic option evaluation by value vs ease
• Triggers: portfolio matrix, NPV, prioritization, bubble chart, project evaluation

Instructions

Evaluate strategic options or projects using the Portfolio Matrix to prioritize resources.

Framework

The Matrix Dimensions

X-Axis (Ease of Implementation)	Y-Axis (Net Present Value)
Hard - Technical complexity, regulatory hurdles, significant disruption	Low - NPV < $1M, quick wins
Medium	Some challenges, change management, moderate complexity
Easy	Proven approach, clear path, minimal resistance

Z-Axis Bubble Size: Represents NPV magnitude (absolute value)

The 2×2 Matrix

                NPV (Y)
                HIGH
                  │
    Hard  │ Medium │  Easy
    ┌───────────┼──────────────────┐
    │   [B]     │   [C]       │
    │  $10M      │   $5M       │
    │             │             │
    │             │             │
    └────────────┼──────────────────┘
                          │
                  LOW
                ┌──────────────┼──────────────────┐
    │  [A]     │   [B]       │
    │   -$2M      │   $15M      │
    │             │             │
    └────────────┼──────────────────┘

Quadrant Strategies

Quadrant	Strategy	Action	Resource Allocation
Hard + High NPV	"Grand Slam" - Go big or go home	Fund fully	💸💸💸
Medium + High NPV	"Strategic Build" - Invest for growth	Fund significantly	💸💸
Easy + High NPV	"Cash Cow"	Harvest & fund growth	📊💸💸
Hard + Low NPV	"Turnaround"	Fix and flip or exit	Reconsider or invest selectively
Medium + Low NPV	"Niche"	Low investment, focused scope	📊📊📊

Output Process

1. Define options - List all opportunities
2. Establish criteria - NPV, ease, strategic fit, risk
3. Score each option - Consistent methodology
4. Create matrix - Plot on 2×2 grid
5. Analyze portfolio - Balance of quadrants?
6. Develop strategy - Shift portfolio as needed
7. Resource allocation - Match capital to priorities

Output Format

## Portfolio Analysis: [Subject]

### Option Evaluation

| Option | NPV | Ease | Strategic Fit | Risk | Score | Priority | Strategy |
|---------|------|------|----------------|--------|----------|-----------|
| [Option A] | $X M | Hard | High | Low | 8/10 | Top | 💸💸💸 |
| [Option B] | $Y M | Medium | High | Medium | 6/10 | High | 💸💸💸 |
| [Option C] | $Z M | Easy | High | Medium | 7/10 | High | 📊💸💸 |
| [Option D] | $W M | Easy | Medium | High | 5/10 | Medium | 📊📊📊 |

### Portfolio Matrix

       HIGH NPV
             LOW
        ┌──────────────┼──────────────────┐
        │             │               │
Hard │ Medium │ Easy
┌───────┼──────────┬─────────┐ │ ┌───────┼──────────┬─────────┐
│   [A]  │   [B]   │   │   [C]   │   │   [D]   │
│   $10M │  $5M    │   │   $15M  │   │   $25M  │   │
└────────┼──────────┴─────────┘ │ └────────┼──────────┴─────────┘ │ └────────┼──────────┴─────────┘
                      │
            NPV (Y)
        HIGH
            ┌──────────────┼──────────────────┐
        │             │               │
Medium │ Easy
┌───────┼──────────┬─────────┐ │ ┌───────┼──────────┬─────────┐
│   [B]  │   [C]   │   │   [D]   │   │   [D]   │
│   $5M  │  $15M  │   │   $25M  │   │   $20M  │   │
└────────┼──────────┴─────────┘ │ └────────┼──────────┴─────────┘ │ └────────┼──────────┴─────────┘

### Portfolio Balance

| Quadrant | Count | % NPV | % Resources | Strategy |
|-----------|---------|---------|-------------|--------------|
| Top-Left | X | Y% | Z% | 💸💸💸 | Aggressive |
| Top-Right | Y | Y% | Z% | 📊💸💸 | Growth |
| Bottom-Left | Z | W% | V% | 🔴📊🔴 | Defensive |
| Bottom-Right | W | W% | V% | 📊📊📊 | Harvest |

### Resource Allocation

| Priority | Allocated Capital | % of Budget | Projects |
|----------|----------------|----------------|-------------------|
| 1 (Grand Slam) | $X M | 40% | [A] | [List] |
| 2 (Strategic Build) | $Y M | 30% | [B,C] | [List] |
| 3 (Cash Cow) | $Z M | 20% | [C,D] | [List] |
| 4 (Hold/Review) | $V M | 10% | Low | [List] |

### Strategic Recommendations

1. **[Recommendation 1]** - [Description]
2. **[Recommendation 2]** - [Description]

---

### Risk Assessment

| Risk | Option | Probability | Impact | Mitigation |
|------|---------|----------|-------------|------------|
| [Risk 1] | [Option A] | X% | High | [Action] |
| [Risk 2] | [Option B] | Y% | Medium | [Action] |

Tips

• Use consistent scoring - make criteria explicit
• NPV is not everything - consider strategic value
• Ease estimates are subjective - validate with implementation plans
• Portfolio needs balance - all four quadrants
• Update matrix regularly - as conditions change
• Use multiple criteria beyond just NPV
• Size bubbles to show value magnitude

References

• Various project management and strategic decision frameworks
• Various MBA and executive education sources