Skip to main content

write-issues-tickets

Guidelines for drafting and formatting Jira tickets and GitHub issues

Source facts

Repository
adobe/adobe-labs-website
Last source activity
August 27, 2026 at 17:32
Detected SKILL.md language
English
Stars
1
Forks
1

Install options

The review-first prompt is selected by default. You can switch to a direct command or download a local copy.

Review the source files

Read SKILL.md and any companion files shown by SkillsMP before deciding whether to install.

Showing SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Source instructions · Read-only preview
name
write-issues-tickets
description
Guidelines for drafting and formatting Jira tickets and GitHub issues
# Writing tickets/issues guidelines When prompted to create a Jira ticket, output the following: - Title - Severity - Description Output results in the chat window in a way that can be copied and pasted into Jira. ## Jira syntax formatting rules Use these syntax rules when writing Jira tickets: - `h2.` through `h6.` - Headings (use `h2.` for main, `h3.` for secondary, etc. - avoid `h1.` in descriptions) - `*text*` - Bold text (see **Bold usage** below; do not pepper bold across the description) - `{{code}}` - Inline code - `{code:language}{code}` - Language-specific code blocks, as in `{code:js}{code}` for JavaScript and Typescript code blocks (JIRA doesn't support `{code:typescript}`) - `[text|url]` - Links - `-` - Bullet points - `#` - Numbered list items ### Bold usage - Default to **no** bold in Overview, Technical notes, Open questions, QA, Source, and other sections. Keep those sections plain text (plus `{{code}}` and links as needed). - In the **Acceptance criteria** section **only**, use `*text*` to bold the three BDD keywords **Given**, **When**, and **Then** at the start of each clause. Do not bold the rest of the sentence, random nouns, or every other word. - Use consistent casing in the written criteria (e.g. sentence case after each keyword; match your team’s style). In Jira, only wrap the three keywords: `*Given*`, `*When*`, `*Then*`. - **Bad:** `*Given* *light* *mode* *and* *dark* *mode*, *when* a *page* *loads*...` (over-bold) - **Good:** `*Given* light and dark site themes are available, *when* a page loads in each theme, *then* background gradients match the spec without harsh banding.` ## Title format - Use the format: `[Component] Brief description of change or issue` - Keep titles concise but descriptive (under 80 characters) - Use present tense for the description (e.g., "Add" not "Added") ## Description structure - Present title, labels, and severity before description content - Include links to GitHub pull requests or RFCs when applicable (prompt if not provided) - All tickets must include acceptance criteria - Provide enough context so anyone can understand the objective - Use prefixes in titles: [Bug], [Fix], [Docs], [Refactor], [Spike], [Test] Examples: - [Bug(component)]: - [bug]: - [Fix(component)]: - [fix]: - [Docs(component)]: - [docs]: - [Documentation]: - [Refactor(component)]: - [Spike(component)]: - [discovery]: - [Test(component)]: ## More specific templates ### General issue/ticket template ``` h2. Overview (plain language explaining the ticket) h2. Acceptance criteria (how we ensure that the work is complete) h2. Technical notes/resources (any technical notes/links/etc) h2. QA (steps someone will use to be sure that the work fulfills the ticket's request and that everything's working properly) h2. Design specs (are there any design specs/files/mock-ups we can include here? Any other design notes?) ``` ### Bug reporting template ``` {*}Link to original issue:{*} (Add a link to the original issue if applicable) h2. Expected behavior (Description of what the user would expect to happen) h2. Actual behavior (The actual behavior observed by the user) h2. Screenshots (Screenshots of the problem if applicable) h2. How can we reproduce the issue? # Go to '...' # Click on '....' # Scroll to '....' # Check console # See error <!-- add more reproduction steps if applicable--> h2. Sample code or abstract reproduction which illustrates the problem (are there any design specs/files/mock-ups we can include here? Any other design notes?) h2. Severity (The severity of the issue according to the classification below) ``` ## Severity classification - SEV1: Critical - System down, data loss, security breach - SEV2: High - Major feature broken, significant user impact - SEV3: Medium - Feature partially broken, moderate impact - SEV4: Low - Minor issues, minimal user impact - SEV5: Trivial - Cosmetic issues, no functional impact ## Best practices - Link to relevant GitHub issues or pull requests using the format: `GH-{number}` - Include the block name in brackets if applicable: `[cards]`, `[header]` - Add relevant labels for easier filtering - Attach screenshots or videos for visual changes - Reference design specs or documentation when available ## Agent criteria for writing tickets/issues - Write the overviews in plain language as user stories (i.e. "As a user, I want to...") - Write acceptance criteria in "Given/When/Then" format, and in Jira bold **only** those three keywords in each criterion (see **Bold usage** under Jira syntax formatting rules). - Make acceptance criteria specific and testable - Include edge cases and error scenarios - Document accessibility requirements and testing steps <!-- TODO: define any labels --> <!-- ## Labels --> ## Issue type Jira includes the following issue types: - Bug: For something in the code that needs to be fixed. - Epic: For tickets that are larger than 8 story points and need to be broken up into multiple issues. - Story: For tickets that tie to code deliverables. Whether that's research, an RFC, or a pull request, it counts! If you don't know what your issue type should be, this is a safe bet. - Task: For work that doesn't relate to a code deliverable.
View on GitHub