Skip to main content

check

Validate the spec and the documents, report where the project stands and what to run next, or audit the implementation against the documents Arguments: [--docs | --code | --new | (empty = spec + documents + dashboard)].

Source facts

Repository
Agents-Store/codex-plugins
Last source activity
November 1, 2026 at 02:46
Detected SKILL.md language
English
Stars
0
Forks
0

Install options

The review-first prompt is selected by default. You can switch to a direct command or download a local copy.

Review the source files

Read SKILL.md and any companion files shown by SkillsMP before deciding whether to install.

Showing SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Source instructions · Read-only preview
name
check
description
Validate the spec and the documents, report where the project stands and what to run next, or audit the implementation against the documents Arguments: [--docs | --code | --new | (empty = spec + documents + dashboard)].
Read-only in every mode. Nothing here writes to the spec or to a client document. **Empty** — `macstack-dev:lint`, all three passes, then the status screen. One engine, two ways of printing it: the dashboard is the lint findings ordered by cost of ignoring them, not a second set of predicates with its own opinion. The dashboard also reports **task statuses that disagree with the audit** — read-only, no `--apply`: ```bash python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/planning/references/task_status.py" macstack ``` Both directions, and the second is the one worth reading first: a task standing `done` whose case the newest verdict found `absent`. A work list that looks shorter than the truth is one nobody goes looking behind. Print the moves it proposes and name `/macstack-dev:update` as what applies them — this command never writes. **`--docs`** — pass 3 and the judgment checks only. Use it after editing documents and before handing anything to a client. **`--code`** — `macstack-dev:conformance`. Starts from a **case id**: does the implementation do what this case promises? Writes one `audit` row per case into `history/ledger.jsonl`. Those verdicts are what `/macstack-dev:plan` reads to tell real work from a document nobody has checked — without them a gap report counts every case the team already built. **`--new`** — `macstack-dev:code-audit`. Starts from a **file** and asks the opposite question: what is in the code that no document mentions? Enumerates the code by the conventions the spec declares, then sorts every candidate into one of three lists — not in the documents · not in the code · contradicts. Output is a proposal, never an edit: what to do about a contradiction is the owner's ruling, and it is applied through `/macstack-dev:intake`. Both read the source tree and neither writes to it. Run `--code` when you want to know whether the promises hold; `--new` when you suspect the code has moved on without the documents. On a folder nobody has audited in months, run `--new` first: a verdict on a case the documents never described is a verdict on the wrong question. **When the answer is "both have moved"**, this command is the wrong one — it reports and stops by design. `/macstack-dev:reconcile --master=code|docs` is what closes the distance, and it makes you say which side is right before it touches anything. Report errors before warnings, and end with the single next command. If the spec fails lint, say plainly that it must not be scaffolded from.
View on GitHub