SkillAlchemy — 一念落地，万象成形。输入任意想法或蒸馏目标，输出可安装的 SKILL.md。 内部编排 Lens（看清问题）和 LEAP（执行蒸馏/融合）。用户唯一入口。 Use when 用户说「蒸馏」「生成 skill」「融合」「我想做 X 但不知道从哪下手」。
LEAP — 落地执行引擎。内含两条管线：A 分支蒸馏（从 raw data 提取 skill）、 B 分支融合（多 skill 编织为一个）。被 SkillAlchemy 编排器调用。 Use when 编排器判断需要蒸馏或融合时。
Screens biomedical / life-science papers for signs of data fabrication, image manipulation, and statistical anomalies, using the detection techniques distilled from the field's canonical exposure platforms (PubPeer, Data Colada, Science Integrity Digest, For Better Science) and tools (ImageTwin/Proofig, statcheck, GRIM/GRIMMER, Problematic Paper Screener, Seek & Blastn). Use when asked to check a paper/figure for image duplication, blot splicing, impossible statistics, paper-mill or tortured-phrase signals, research integrity, or "is this data faked"; or when a user shares a figure, Western blot, supplementary dataset, or DOI and asks whether it looks manipulated. Reports observable anomalies as questions for clarification — it never accuses anyone of fraud.
Lens — 给你的问题加一层认知镜片。输入任意任务描述，输出增强版 description， 发现「你不知道自己不知道」的隐性维度、前置条件和认知路线。 Use when 用户说「帮我想想」「分析一下」「生成 skill」「蒸馏」「融合」 或输入看起来太简单需要展开。
Cross-framework enhancement overlay for choosing a multi-agent topology BEFORE writing any agent. A binary-question rubric — is single-agent + tools enough? do agents need to know about each other? does the output need one voice? — maps the answer to single-agent / supervisor / swarm / sequential / hierarchical. Activates when a coder agent is tempted to "split the work into roles" or reaches for a multi-agent framework. Encodes the *selection rubric* that the per-framework skills assume but never surface. Search keywords: when to use multi-agent, single vs multi agent, do I need multiple agents, supervisor vs swarm, multi-agent vs single agent, agent team design.
SOP for terminal-based, git-native AI pair programming with Aider (git work-tree + tree-sitter repo-map + edit-format + human-in-loop REPL). Use when editing code in an existing git repo via an LLM, when you need to converge a change to 2-5 files, pick an edit format that fits the model, run architect+editor mode, or wire an auto-test loop.
Universal discipline for any LM-driven loop — agent retries, plan-act-observe, multi-agent handoffs, optimiser passes, test-fix cycles. Encodes the one rule every framework documents quietly and every team relearns expensively: the LM in the loop is NEVER a reliable terminator. Termination must be provided by an explicit counter + exit predicate + stagnation signal + escalation path that live OUTSIDE the LM's control. This is a tool- level, framework-agnostic skill. It maps onto LangGraph (recursion_limit + state counter + interrupt), CrewAI (max_iter + max_rpm + human_input), Claude / OpenAI SDKs (max_iterations + tool_use_budget), DSPy (declared evaluation budget), Aider (REPL + explicit retry cap), and AutoGen (max_consecutive_auto_reply). Search keywords: infinite loop, recursion limit, recursion_limit, GraphRecursionError, max iterations, max_iter, agent stuck, agent won't stop, runaway agent, ReAct loop not terminating, agent repeating itself.
Decision rubric for when an LM agent should write-and-run code (Program-of-Thought / code interpreter) versus reason in natural language: classify each step as deterministic- computable (emit + execute code, feed the result back) vs judgment (stay in prose). Use when designing or debugging an agent step that does arithmetic/parsing/data transforms, when prose reasoning hallucinates a computation (under-coding), or when a sandbox round- trip is wasted on a judgment task (over-coding). Search keywords: code interpreter, agent does math wrong, calculator hallucination, when to run code vs reason, program of thought, PoT, tool vs reasoning.