Menu
Full 9-phase workflow for complex features, epics, and security-critical changes (2-4 hours)
The review-first prompt is selected by default. You can switch to a direct command or download a local copy.
Read SKILL.md and any companion files shown by SkillsMP before deciding whether to install.
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
A direct command skips the review prompt. Inspect the source before running it.
npx skills add https://github.com/ajstack22/StackMap --skill atlas-fullThe command stays on one line. Scroll horizontally to inspect it before copying.
Prefer a local copy? Download the files currently available to SkillsMP.
Showing SKILL.md
| name | atlas-full |
| description | Full 9-phase workflow for complex features, epics, and security-critical changes (2-4 hours) |
Perfect for (complex tasks, ~5% of work):
Time estimate: 2-4 hours
Success criteria:
Phase 1: Research → Deep exploration, feasibility analysis
Phase 2: Story Creation → Formal requirements, acceptance criteria
Phase 3: Planning → Technical design, architecture
Phase 4: Adversarial Review → Security audit, edge case analysis
Phase 5: Implementation → Parallel coding, incremental builds
Phase 6: Testing → Comprehensive validation, all platforms
Phase 7: Validation → Acceptance criteria verification
Phase 8: Clean-up → Documentation, artifacts, debt log
Phase 9: Deployment → Full quality gates, staged rollout
Goal: Deep understanding of requirements, feasibility, and technical landscape.
Time allocation: 20-30 minutes
Define the problem space
Explore current implementation
# Find all related code
grep -r "related_feature" src/
# Find similar patterns
find src/ -name "*similar*"
# Check git history for similar features
git log --grep="similar feature" --oneline
Research dependencies and integrations
Identify risks and constraints
Evaluate alternatives
Problem Understanding:
Technical Research:
Risk Analysis:
Feasibility:
For data/state changes:
useAppStore, useUserStore, useSettingsStore, useLibraryStore)text/icon, Users: name/icon)For UI/UX changes:
.native.js, .web.js, .ios.js, .android.js)For cross-platform features:
For security-critical changes:
## Research Findings: [Feature Name]
### Problem Statement:
[Clear description of what we're solving]
### Users Affected:
- [User type 1]: [how they benefit]
- [User type 2]: [how they benefit]
### Technical Approach:
[High-level approach, alternatives considered]
### Files to Create/Modify:
- /path/to/new/file.js - [purpose]
- /path/to/existing/file.js - [what changes]
- /path/to/test/file.test.js - [test coverage]
### Dependencies:
- External: [external packages, APIs]
- Internal: [internal modules, services]
### Platform Considerations:
- **iOS**: [specific notes]
- **Android**: [specific notes]
- **Web**: [specific notes]
### Data/Store Impact:
- Store(s): [which stores]
- Fields: [new/modified fields]
- Migration: [data migration strategy]
- Sync: [sync implications]
### Risks:
1. [Risk 1] - Mitigation: [strategy]
2. [Risk 2] - Mitigation: [strategy]
### Success Metrics:
- [Metric 1]: [target]
- [Metric 2]: [target]
### Timeline Estimate:
- Research: [time]
- Implementation: [time]
- Testing: [time]
- Total: [time]
## Research Findings: Photo Attachments for Activities
### Problem Statement:
Users want to attach photos to their activities to provide visual context
and make activity tracking more engaging and memorable.
### Users Affected:
- All users: Can attach photos to activities
- Premium users: Can attach unlimited photos (free: max 3 per activity)
### Technical Approach:
1. Use expo-image-picker for photo selection
2. Store photos in Firebase Storage
3. Store photo URLs in activity.photos array
4. Implement thumbnail generation for performance
5. Lazy load photos in activity cards
Alternatives considered:
- Store base64 in sync data: Rejected (too large, slow sync)
- Use device storage only: Rejected (not cross-device)
### Files to Create/Modify:
- /src/services/photoService.js - Upload, delete, thumbnail generation
- /src/components/ActivityCard.js - Display thumbnail
- /src/components/PhotoAttachment.js - Photo picker UI (NEW)
- /src/components/PhotoGallery.js - Full screen photo viewer (NEW)
- /src/stores/useAppStore.js - Add photos array to activity schema
- /src/services/sync/syncService.js - Sync photo URLs (not files)
- /tests/services/photoService.test.js - Test upload/delete (NEW)
### Dependencies:
- External: expo-image-picker, firebase-storage
- Internal: useAppStore, syncService, dataNormalizer
### Platform Considerations:
- **iOS**: Requires camera/photo library permissions in Info.plist
- **Android**: Requires camera/storage permissions in AndroidManifest.xml
- **Web**: Use file input, no native picker
### Data/Store Impact:
- Store: useAppStore (activities)
- New field: activity.photos (array of { url, thumbnailUrl, timestamp })
- Migration: Add empty photos array to existing activities
- Sync: Only sync URLs, not photo files (files stored in Firebase)
### Risks:
1. Storage costs - Mitigation: Thumbnail compression, size limits
2. Photo permissions denial - Mitigation: Clear UI messaging, fallback
3. Upload failures on poor network - Mitigation: Retry logic, offline queue
4. Photo deletion not synced - Mitigation: Include deleted photo URLs in sync
### Success Metrics:
- 80%+ of active users attach at least one photo in first week
- Average upload time < 3 seconds
- Photo display time < 200ms (thumbnail)
- Zero storage-related crashes
### Timeline Estimate:
- Research: 30 min ✅
- Story Creation: 15 min
- Planning: 30 min
- Implementation: 90 min
- Testing: 45 min
- Total: 3.5 hours
Goal: Create formal user stories with acceptance criteria and success metrics.
Time allocation: 15-20 minutes
Write user stories
Define acceptance criteria
Set success metrics
Create testing scenarios
Use the template in resources/story-template.md for consistent formatting.
# User Story: [Feature Name]
## Story
As a [user type]
I want [goal]
So that [benefit]
## Acceptance Criteria
### Must Have:
1. [ ] [Specific, testable criterion 1]
2. [ ] [Specific, testable criterion 2]
3. [ ] [Specific, testable criterion 3]
### Should Have:
1. [ ] [Nice-to-have criterion 1]
2. [ ] [Nice-to-have criterion 2]
### Platform-Specific:
- **iOS**: [ ] [iOS-specific requirement]
- **Android**: [ ] [Android-specific requirement]
- **Web**: [ ] [Web-specific requirement]
## Success Metrics
- [Metric 1]: [Target value]
- [Metric 2]: [Target value]
## Testing Scenarios
### Happy Path:
1. [Step 1]
2. [Step 2]
3. Expected: [Result]
### Edge Cases:
1. **Empty state**: [Expected behavior]
2. **Error state**: [Expected behavior]
3. **Offline**: [Expected behavior]
## Dependencies
- [Dependency 1]
- [Dependency 2]
## Risks
- [Risk 1]: [Mitigation]
- [Risk 2]: [Mitigation]
# User Story: Photo Attachments for Activities
## Story
As an active user
I want to attach photos to my activities
So that I can add visual context and make my activity log more engaging
## Acceptance Criteria
### Must Have:
1. [ ] User can select photo from device gallery
2. [ ] User can take new photo with camera
3. [ ] User can attach up to 3 photos per activity (free tier)
4. [ ] Photos display as thumbnails in activity card
5. [ ] Tapping thumbnail opens full-screen photo viewer
6. [ ] User can delete attached photos
7. [ ] Photos sync across devices (URLs only, not files)
8. [ ] Upload shows progress indicator
9. [ ] Failed uploads show error message with retry option
10. [ ] Photos compressed/thumbnailed for performance
### Should Have:
1. [ ] User can reorder photos (drag and drop)
2. [ ] Photos include timestamp/location metadata
3. [ ] Swipe gesture to navigate between photos in viewer
4. [ ] Share photo to social media
### Platform-Specific:
- **iOS**: [ ] Request camera/photo library permissions
- **iOS**: [ ] Handle permission denial gracefully
- **Android**: [ ] Request camera/storage permissions
- **Android**: [ ] Handle permission denial gracefully
- **Web**: [ ] Use file input (no native picker)
- **Web**: [ ] Support drag-and-drop photo upload
## Success Metrics
- **Adoption**: 80%+ of active users attach at least one photo in first week
- **Performance**: Average upload time < 3 seconds
- **Performance**: Photo thumbnail display < 200ms
- **Reliability**: 99%+ upload success rate
- **Quality**: Zero storage-related crashes
## Testing Scenarios
### Happy Path:
1. User taps "Add Photo" button
2. User selects photo from gallery
3. Photo uploads with progress indicator
4. Thumbnail displays in activity card
5. Tapping thumbnail opens full-screen viewer
Expected: Photo displays correctly, all interactions smooth
### Edge Cases:
**Slow network**:
- Upload shows progress
- User can cancel upload
- Retry available on failure
**Permissions denied**:
- Clear message explaining why permission needed
- Link to settings to enable permission
- Graceful fallback (no crash)
**Large photo file**:
- Automatic compression before upload
- Warning if file too large (>10MB)
- Thumbnail generated for display
**Offline mode**:
- Photo queued for upload when online
- Indicator showing "pending upload"
- Retry automatically when connection restored
**Storage full (device)**:
- Error message shown
- Prompt user to free space
- Don't crash app
**Storage quota exceeded (Firebase)**:
- Error message shown
- Prompt to upgrade or delete old photos
- Graceful degradation
## Dependencies
- expo-image-picker (photo selection)
- firebase-storage (cloud storage)
- react-native-fast-image (thumbnail caching)
## Risks
- **Storage costs**: Mitigate with compression, size limits, cleanup policy
- **Permission denial**: Mitigate with clear messaging, graceful fallback
- **Upload failures**: Mitigate with retry logic, offline queue
- **Performance on old devices**: Mitigate with lazy loading, thumbnail optimization
Goal: Create detailed technical design and implementation plan.
Time allocation: 20-30 minutes
Architecture design
File-by-file implementation plan
Data schema design
Testing strategy
Rollout strategy
## Implementation Plan: [Feature Name]
### Architecture
#### Component Structure:
[Draw component hierarchy or describe]
#### Data Flow:
User Action → Component → Service → Store → UI Update [Detailed flow diagram or description]
#### State Management:
- **Store**: [which store(s)]
- **State shape**: [schema]
- **Update methods**: [new methods needed]
### File-by-File Plan
#### New Files:
1. **/src/services/newService.js**
- Purpose: [what it does]
- Functions:
- `function1()`: [description]
- `function2()`: [description]
- Dependencies: [what it imports]
2. **/src/components/NewComponent.js**
- Purpose: [what it does]
- Props: [prop schema]
- State: [local state]
- Platform: [shared/native/web]
#### Modified Files:
1. **/src/stores/useAppStore.js**
- Add: [new state fields]
- Modify: [existing functions]
- Migration: [how to handle existing data]
2. **/src/components/ExistingComponent.js**
- Add: [new feature integration]
- Modify: [existing behavior]
#### Test Files:
1. **/tests/services/newService.test.js**
- Test coverage:
- [ ] Unit tests for all functions
- [ ] Edge cases
- [ ] Error handling
### Data Schema
#### New Fields:
```javascript
activity: {
// ... existing fields
newField: {
type: [type],
required: [boolean],
default: [default value],
validation: [validation rules]
}
}
// How to handle existing data
const migrateOldData = (activity) => {
return {
...activity,
newField: activity.legacyField || defaultValue
}
}
newService.function1() - happy pathnewService.function1() - error casesnewService.function2() - edge casesIteration 1: Core functionality
Iteration 2: UI integration
Iteration 3: Edge cases
Iteration 4: Polish
QUAL (development testing):
STAGE (internal validation):
BETA (closed beta):
PROD (full release):
If critical issues arise:
Metrics to track:
Alerts:
Field Naming:
text, icon (canonical)text || name || title, icon || emoji (with fallbacks)Store Updates:
useUserStore.getState().setUsers()useAppStore.setState() directlyPlatform Considerations:
Sync Strategy:
Design Rules:
### Example Plan:
*(See resources/plan-example.md for full example)*
### Planning Validation Checklist:
- [ ] Architecture clearly defined
- [ ] File-by-file plan complete
- [ ] Implementation order logical
- [ ] Testing strategy comprehensive
- [ ] Rollout strategy defined
- [ ] Rollback plan ready
- [ ] Monitoring plan in place
- [ ] StackMap conventions addressed
- [ ] Platform-specific considerations documented
- [ ] Data migration strategy clear
---
## Phase 4: Adversarial Review
**Goal**: Security audit, edge case analysis, and critical evaluation.
**Time allocation**: 15-20 minutes
### Steps:
1. **Security audit**
- Use checklist in `resources/adversarial-checklist.md`
- Identify vulnerabilities
- Assess attack vectors
- Validate data encryption
- Check authentication/authorization
2. **Edge case analysis**
- What can go wrong?
- What assumptions might break?
- What happens under load?
- What if external dependencies fail?
3. **Performance analysis**
- Memory usage implications
- Network bandwidth usage
- Battery impact (mobile)
- Startup time impact
4. **Cross-platform compatibility**
- iOS-specific issues?
- Android-specific issues?
- Web-specific issues?
- Version compatibility?
5. **Maintainability review**
- Code complexity reasonable?
- Test coverage sufficient?
- Documentation clear?
- Technical debt acceptable?
### Adversarial Review Checklist:
Use the comprehensive checklist in `resources/adversarial-checklist.md`.
**Security** (if applicable):
- [ ] User data encrypted at rest
- [ ] User data encrypted in transit
- [ ] Authentication required where needed
- [ ] Authorization checked for all actions
- [ ] Input validation/sanitization
- [ ] No secrets in code
- [ ] API keys secured
- [ ] No XSS vulnerabilities
- [ ] No SQL injection vulnerabilities
**Edge Cases**:
- [ ] Empty states handled
- [ ] Null/undefined handled
- [ ] Network failures handled
- [ ] Offline mode supported
- [ ] Race conditions prevented
- [ ] Concurrent access handled
- [ ] Large datasets handled
- [ ] Old app versions compatible
**Performance**:
- [ ] Load time acceptable (< 3s)
- [ ] Memory usage reasonable
- [ ] No memory leaks
- [ ] Network bandwidth optimized
- [ ] Battery impact minimal (mobile)
- [ ] Startup time not impacted
- [ ] 60fps maintained (animations)
**Cross-Platform**:
- [ ] iOS testing complete
- [ ] Android testing complete
- [ ] Web testing complete
- [ ] Platform-specific gotchas addressed
- [ ] No platform-specific APIs in shared code
- [ ] Consistent UX across platforms
**Maintainability**:
- [ ] Code complexity reasonable (no 500-line functions)
- [ ] Adequate comments for complex logic
- [ ] Test coverage > 80% for critical paths
- [ ] Documentation complete
- [ ] No copy-paste duplication
- [ ] Follows project patterns
**StackMap-Specific**:
- [ ] Store-specific update methods used
- [ ] Field naming conventions followed
- [ ] Fallbacks included for legacy fields
- [ ] Typography component used (not direct fontWeight)
- [ ] No gray text (only #000)
- [ ] Platform gotchas addressed (CLAUDE.md)
### Adversarial Questions:
Ask yourself tough questions:
1. **"What's the worst that could happen?"**
- User loses data?
- App crashes?
- Security breach?
- How do we prevent it?
2. **"What if this becomes popular?"**
- Can it scale?
- Storage costs?
- Performance under load?
3. **"What if external service fails?"**
- Firebase down?
- Network offline?
- API timeout?
- Graceful degradation?
4. **"What if user does unexpected thing?"**
- Spams button?
- Enters invalid data?
- Uses old app version?
- Switches platforms?
5. **"What will break in 6 months?"**
- Technical debt?
- Deprecated APIs?
- Maintenance burden?
- Future compatibility?
### Red Flags:
**Stop and reconsider if:**
- 🚩 Security concerns unaddressed
- 🚩 Performance implications unclear
- 🚩 Rollback plan not feasible
- 🚩 Testing strategy inadequate
- 🚩 Technical debt too high
- 🚩 Cross-platform issues unresolved
- 🚩 Edge cases not handled
### Adversarial Review Output:
```markdown
## Adversarial Review: [Feature Name]
### Security Assessment: ✅ PASS / ⚠️ CONCERNS / ❌ FAIL
[Details of security review]
**Concerns found**:
1. [Concern 1] - Mitigation: [plan]
2. [Concern 2] - Mitigation: [plan]
### Edge Case Analysis: ✅ COVERED / ⚠️ PARTIAL / ❌ GAPS
[Details of edge case analysis]
**Edge cases to address**:
1. [Case 1] - Plan: [how to handle]
2. [Case 2] - Plan: [how to handle]
### Performance Assessment: ✅ GOOD / ⚠️ ACCEPTABLE / ❌ CONCERNING
[Details of performance analysis]
**Optimizations needed**:
1. [Optimization 1]
2. [Optimization 2]
### Cross-Platform Compatibility: ✅ READY / ⚠️ NEEDS WORK / ❌ BLOCKED
[Details of cross-platform review]
**Platform issues to address**:
- iOS: [issues]
- Android: [issues]
- Web: [issues]
### Maintainability: ✅ GOOD / ⚠️ ACCEPTABLE / ❌ HIGH DEBT
[Details of maintainability review]
**Debt to address**:
1. [Debt item 1]
2. [Debt item 2]
### Overall Verdict: ✅ PROCEED / ⚠️ PROCEED WITH CAUTION / ❌ REVISE PLAN
**Blocking issues** (must fix before proceeding):
1. [Issue 1]
2. [Issue 2]
**Non-blocking issues** (address during implementation):
1. [Issue 1]
2. [Issue 2]
## Adversarial Review: Photo Attachments
### Security Assessment: ✅ PASS
**Reviewed**:
- Photos stored in Firebase Storage (secure, access-controlled)
- Photo URLs in sync data (encrypted with NaCl)
- No direct file access from unauthorized users
- Permissions properly requested on mobile
**Concerns found**: None blocking
### Edge Case Analysis: ⚠️ PARTIAL
**Edge cases covered**:
- Offline upload queue ✅
- Permission denial handling ✅
- Large file compression ✅
- Upload failure retry ✅
**Edge cases to address**:
1. User deletes photo while uploading - Plan: Cancel upload, remove from queue
2. Firebase storage quota exceeded - Plan: Show error, prompt upgrade or cleanup
3. Photo corruption during upload - Plan: Validate file before upload, retry on corruption
### Performance Assessment: ⚠️ ACCEPTABLE
**Measurements**:
- Upload time: ~2.5s for 5MB photo ✅
- Thumbnail display: ~150ms ✅
- Memory usage: +15MB per photo in gallery (concern for many photos)
**Optimizations needed**:
1. Implement photo lazy loading (only load visible photos)
2. Add memory cache with size limit (max 10 photos in memory)
3. Thumbnail pre-caching on scroll
### Cross-Platform Compatibility: ✅ READY
**Platform testing**:
- iOS: Permissions, photo picker work ✅
- Android: Permissions, photo picker work ✅
- Web: File input works ✅
**Platform-specific considerations addressed**:
- iOS Info.plist permissions ✅
- Android manifest permissions ✅
- Web drag-and-drop ✅
### Maintainability: ✅ GOOD
**Code quality**:
- photoService.js well-structured (~200 lines)
- Clear separation of concerns
- Adequate comments
- Test coverage planned at 85%
**Technical debt**: Minimal, acceptable
### Overall Verdict: ⚠️ PROCEED WITH CAUTION
**Blocking issues**: None
**Non-blocking issues** (address during implementation):
1. Memory optimization for photo gallery (lazy loading)
2. Handle storage quota exceeded gracefully
3. Handle photo deletion during upload
**Recommendation**: Proceed to implementation. Address non-blocking issues in Phase 5.
Goal: Build the feature incrementally with parallel work where possible.
Time allocation: 60-90 minutes
Set up implementation tracking
Implement in iterations
Follow coding standards
__DEV__Incremental validation
Parallel Work (can be done simultaneously):
Sequential Work (must be done in order):
Before starting:
During implementation:
setState)text, icon)__DEV__npm run typecheck periodicallyAfter each iteration:
Iteration 1: Core Functionality (20-30 min) Goal: Basic feature works in isolation
Iteration 2: UI Integration (20-30 min) Goal: Feature accessible to users
Iteration 3: Edge Cases (15-20 min) Goal: All scenarios handled gracefully
Iteration 4: Polish (10-15 min) Goal: Performance, UX, accessibility
Store Updates (CRITICAL):
// ❌ WRONG: Direct setState
useAppStore.setState({ users: newUsers })
// ✅ CORRECT: Store-specific method
useUserStore.getState().setUsers(newUsers)
// ✅ CORRECT: Store-specific method for settings
useSettingsStore.getState().updateSettings({ theme: 'dark' })
// ✅ CORRECT: Store-specific method for library
useLibraryStore.getState().setLibrary(newLibrary)
Field Naming (CRITICAL):
// ❌ WRONG: Legacy field names
activity.name = "Running"
activity.emoji = "🏃"
// ✅ CORRECT: Canonical field names
activity.text = "Running"
activity.icon = "🏃"
// ✅ CORRECT: Reading with fallbacks
const text = activity.text || activity.name || activity.title
const icon = activity.icon || activity.emoji
Typography (Platform Compatibility):
// ❌ WRONG: Direct fontWeight on Android
<Text style={{ fontWeight: 'bold' }}>Hello</Text>
// ✅ CORRECT: Use Typography component
<Typography fontWeight="bold">Hello</Typography>
Design Rules:
// ❌ WRONG: Gray text (accessibility)
<Text style={{ color: '#666666' }}>Text</Text>
// ✅ CORRECT: Black text
<Text style={{ color: '#000000' }}>Text</Text>
Platform-Specific Files:
# Shared code (iOS + Android + Web)
Component.js
# Mobile only (iOS + Android)
Component.native.js
# Web only
Component.web.js
# iOS only (rare)
Component.ios.js
# Android only (rare)
Component.android.js
Function length: < 50 lines (split if longer)
File length: < 500 lines (split into modules if longer)
Cyclomatic complexity: < 10 (refactor if higher)
Comments: For non-obvious logic, not obvious code
Variable names: Descriptive, not abbreviated (unless common: id, url)
No magic numbers: Use named constants
## Implementation Progress: Photo Attachments
### Iteration 1: Core Functionality ✅ COMPLETE (25 min)
- ✅ Created /src/services/photoService.js
- uploadPhoto(uri, activityId)
- deletePhoto(url, activityId)
- generateThumbnail(uri)
- ✅ Added tests to /tests/services/photoService.test.js
- ✅ Added activity.photos to store schema
- ✅ Type checking passes
### Iteration 2: UI Integration ⏳ IN PROGRESS (15/30 min)
- ✅ Created /src/components/PhotoAttachment.js
- ✅ Created /src/components/PhotoGallery.js
- ✅ Updated /src/components/ActivityCard.js to show thumbnails
- 🔄 Integrating with ActivityEditModal
- ⏳ Adding loading/error states
### Iteration 3: Edge Cases ⏳ PENDING
- Handle upload cancellation
- Handle storage quota exceeded
- Offline queue implementation
- Permission denial flow
### Iteration 4: Polish ⏳ PENDING
- Memory optimization (lazy loading)
- Thumbnail pre-caching
- Animation polish
- Accessibility improvements
### Issues Found:
1. ⚠️ Upload progress not showing - Fixed: Added progress callback
2. ⚠️ Large photos cause memory spike - TODO: Implement compression earlier
Run these commands periodically:
# Type checking (fast, run often)
npm run typecheck
# Linting (fast)
npm run lint
# Tests (slower, run after each iteration)
npm test
# Build (slowest, run before committing)
npm run build:web # Web build
# iOS/Android builds tested in Phase 6
Goal: Comprehensive validation across all platforms and scenarios.
Time allocation: 30-45 minutes
Automated testing
# Unit tests
npm test
# Type checking
npm run typecheck
# Linting
npm run lint
# Build validation
npm run build:web
Manual testing - Happy path
Manual testing - Edge cases
Cross-platform testing
Regression testing
Automated Tests:
Manual Testing - Happy Path:
Manual Testing - Edge Cases:
Platform-Specific Testing:
Regression Testing:
StackMap-Specific Testing:
Use scenarios from Phase 2 story. Example:
### Test Scenario 1: Upload Photo (Happy Path)
**Steps**:
1. Open activity in edit mode
2. Tap "Add Photo" button
3. Select photo from gallery
4. Wait for upload
**Expected**:
- Photo picker opens ✅
- Progress indicator shows ✅
- Thumbnail displays after upload ✅
- Activity updates immediately ✅
**Platforms Tested**:
- iOS Simulator ✅
- Android Emulator ✅
- Web Desktop ✅
**Result**: ✅ PASS
---
### Test Scenario 2: Upload Photo (Offline)
**Steps**:
1. Turn on airplane mode
2. Open activity in edit mode
3. Tap "Add Photo" button
4. Select photo from gallery
5. Turn off airplane mode
**Expected**:
- Photo queued for upload ⚠️
- "Pending upload" indicator shows ⚠️
- Auto-uploads when online ❌ (Not working)
- Notification on success ⏳ (Not tested)
**Platforms Tested**:
- iOS Simulator ⚠️
**Result**: ❌ FAIL - Offline queue not working
**Fix**: Implemented offline queue in photoService.js, retested ✅ PASS
Metrics to measure:
Tools:
Acceptable thresholds (StackMap-specific):
## Testing Report: Photo Attachments
### Automated Tests: ✅ PASS
- Unit tests: 42/42 passed
- Integration tests: 8/8 passed
- Type checking: Pass
- Linting: Pass (3 warnings, non-blocking)
- Build: Success (web, iOS, Android)
- Coverage: 87% (target: 80%)
### Manual Testing - Happy Path: ✅ PASS
All acceptance criteria met across all platforms.
**iOS**: ✅ All features work
**Android**: ✅ All features work
**Web**: ✅ All features work
### Manual Testing - Edge Cases: ⚠️ PARTIAL PASS
**Passed** (8/10):
- Empty states ✅
- Error messages ✅
- Loading states ✅
- Poor network ✅
- Large files ✅
- Rapid actions ✅
- Permissions denied ✅
- Old data migration ✅
**Failed** (2/10):
- Offline upload queue ❌ → Fixed, retested ✅
- Storage quota exceeded ❌ → Fixed, retested ✅
### Platform-Specific Testing: ✅ PASS
- iOS: Permissions, camera, UI ✅
- Android: Permissions, camera, UI ✅
- Web: Responsive, desktop, mobile ✅
### Regression Testing: ✅ PASS
- All existing features work ✅
- No performance degradation ✅
- Sync works correctly ✅
- No new errors ✅
### Performance Testing: ✅ PASS
- Upload time: 2.3s avg (target: < 3s) ✅
- Thumbnail display: 140ms avg (target: < 200ms) ✅
- Memory usage: +12MB (acceptable) ✅
- No memory leaks ✅
- 60fps maintained ✅
### Issues Found & Fixed:
1. ❌ Offline queue not working → Fixed in photoService.js
2. ❌ Storage quota not handled → Added error handling
3. ⚠️ Memory spike with many photos → Added lazy loading
### Overall: ✅ READY FOR VALIDATION
All critical issues resolved. Ready for Phase 7 validation.
Goal: Verify all acceptance criteria met and feature ready for deployment.
Time allocation: 15-20 minutes
Acceptance criteria review
Success metrics validation
Documentation review
Stakeholder review (if applicable)
Acceptance Criteria:
Success Metrics:
Documentation:
Quality Gates:
Stakeholder Approval (if applicable):
## Validation Report: Photo Attachments
### Acceptance Criteria Validation
#### Must Have (10/10) ✅ 100%
1. ✅ User can select photo from gallery
- Evidence: Tested on iOS, Android, Web
- Screenshot: [link to screenshot]
2. ✅ User can take new photo with camera
- Evidence: Tested on iOS, Android (Web: not applicable)
- Screenshot: [link]
3. ✅ Up to 3 photos per activity (free tier)
- Evidence: Tested, 4th photo shows upgrade prompt
- Screenshot: [link]
4. ✅ Thumbnails in activity card
- Evidence: Thumbnails display, tap opens viewer
- Screenshot: [link]
5. ✅ Full-screen photo viewer
- Evidence: Swipe navigation works
- Screenshot: [link]
6. ✅ Delete photos
- Evidence: Delete confirmation, photo removed
- Screenshot: [link]
7. ✅ Photos sync across devices
- Evidence: Tested iOS → Android sync
- Screenshot: [link]
8. ✅ Upload progress indicator
- Evidence: Progress bar shows 0-100%
- Screenshot: [link]
9. ✅ Failed upload error + retry
- Evidence: Error message, retry button works
- Screenshot: [link]
10. ✅ Photos compressed/thumbnailed
- Evidence: 5MB photo → 500KB upload, 50KB thumbnail
- Screenshot: [link]
#### Should Have (2/4) ⚠️ 50% (deferred)
1. ❌ Reorder photos (drag & drop) - DEFERRED to v2
2. ❌ Timestamp/location metadata - DEFERRED to v2
3. ✅ Swipe navigation in viewer - IMPLEMENTED
4. ✅ Share to social media - IMPLEMENTED
**Deferred items**: Added to backlog as separate stories
#### Platform-Specific (6/6) ✅ 100%
- iOS: ✅ Camera/photo permissions
- iOS: ✅ Permission denial handled
- Android: ✅ Camera/storage permissions
- Android: ✅ Permission denial handled
- Web: ✅ File input works
- Web: ✅ Drag-and-drop works
### Success Metrics Validation ✅
**Metrics implemented**:
- ✅ Photo upload tracking (Firebase Analytics)
- ✅ Usage analytics (photos per user)
- ✅ Performance monitoring (upload time)
- ✅ Error tracking (upload failures)
**Targets**:
- Adoption: 80%+ attach photo in week 1 (trackable ✅)
- Performance: Upload < 3s (measured: 2.3s avg ✅)
- Display: Thumbnail < 200ms (measured: 140ms avg ✅)
- Reliability: 99%+ success rate (trackable ✅)
- Quality: Zero storage crashes (monitored ✅)
### Documentation Review ✅
**Updated**:
- ✅ User guide: Added "Attaching Photos" section
- ✅ Developer docs: Documented photoService API
- ✅ CLAUDE.md: Added photo attachment patterns
- ✅ README: No changes needed
### Quality Gates ✅
- ✅ All tests pass (50/50)
- ✅ Type checking passes
- ✅ Build succeeds (web, iOS, Android)
- ✅ No critical bugs
- ✅ Performance meets targets
- ✅ Security review passed
### Stakeholder Review ✅
**Demo given to**: Product team, beta users (3)
**Feedback**:
- 👍 "Love the thumbnail display"
- 👍 "Upload is fast"
- 💡 Suggestion: Add photo captions (backlog item created)
- 💡 Suggestion: Support video (future consideration)
**Sign-off**: ✅ Approved for QUAL deployment
### Overall: ✅ READY FOR DEPLOYMENT
All acceptance criteria met. Success metrics implemented. Documentation complete.
Stakeholder approved. Ready for Phase 8 (Clean-up) and Phase 9 (Deployment).
Agenda:
Attendees:
Goal: Documentation, artifacts, technical debt log, code cleanup.
Time allocation: 15-20 minutes
Code cleanup
Documentation updates
Technical debt log
Create artifacts
Knowledge transfer
Code Cleanup:
__DEV__)Documentation:
Technical Debt Log:
Artifacts:
Knowledge Transfer:
## Technical Debt: [Feature Name]
### Shortcuts Taken:
1. **[Shortcut 1]**
- Why: [reason]
- Impact: [low/medium/high]
- Recommended fix: [description]
- Estimated effort: [time]
2. **[Shortcut 2]**
- Why: [reason]
- Impact: [low/medium/high]
- Recommended fix: [description]
- Estimated effort: [time]
### Future Improvements:
1. **[Improvement 1]**
- Benefit: [description]
- Effort: [time]
- Priority: [low/medium/high]
2. **[Improvement 2]**
- Benefit: [description]
- Effort: [time]
- Priority: [low/medium/high]
### Known Limitations:
1. **[Limitation 1]**
- Description: [details]
- Workaround: [if any]
- Fix planned: [yes/no]
2. **[Limitation 2]**
- Description: [details]
- Workaround: [if any]
- Fix planned: [yes/no]
### Maintenance Tasks:
1. **[Task 1]**
- Frequency: [daily/weekly/monthly]
- Procedure: [description]
2. **[Task 2]**
- Frequency: [daily/weekly/monthly]
- Procedure: [description]
### Refactoring Opportunities:
1. **[Opportunity 1]**
- Current: [current state]
- Proposed: [better approach]
- Benefit: [why refactor]
- Effort: [time]
## Technical Debt: Photo Attachments
### Shortcuts Taken:
1. **Lazy loading not fully optimized**
- Why: Time constraint, works acceptably
- Impact: Medium (memory usage could be better)
- Recommended fix: Implement virtualized list for photo gallery
- Estimated effort: 4 hours
2. **No video support**
- Why: Out of scope for v1
- Impact: Low (future feature request)
- Recommended fix: Extend photoService to support video
- Estimated effort: 8 hours
### Future Improvements:
1. **Photo captions**
- Benefit: Users can add context to photos
- Effort: 2 hours
- Priority: Medium
2. **Photo editing (crop, rotate)**
- Benefit: Users can edit before upload
- Effort: 8 hours
- Priority: Low
3. **Cloud storage cost optimization**
- Benefit: Reduce Firebase Storage costs
- Effort: 4 hours (implement cleanup policy)
- Priority: High (if costs exceed budget)
### Known Limitations:
1. **Max 3 photos on free tier**
- Description: Free users limited to 3 photos per activity
- Workaround: Upgrade to premium
- Fix planned: No (intentional limitation)
2. **Photo compression may reduce quality**
- Description: Large photos compressed to 1080p max
- Workaround: None (necessary for performance)
- Fix planned: No (acceptable trade-off)
3. **No photo sync during upload**
- Description: Photos only sync after upload completes
- Workaround: Wait for upload before switching devices
- Fix planned: Yes (future: sync pending uploads)
### Maintenance Tasks:
1. **Monitor storage costs**
- Frequency: Weekly
- Procedure: Check Firebase Storage usage in console
2. **Clean up orphaned photos**
- Frequency: Monthly
- Procedure: Run cleanup script to remove photos not linked to activities
### Refactoring Opportunities:
1. **Extract photo compression logic**
- Current: Compression in photoService.js (mixed concerns)
- Proposed: Create imageUtils.js with compression utilities
- Benefit: Reusable across app (profile photos, etc.)
- Effort: 2 hours
2. **Unified media service**
- Current: photoService handles only photos
- Proposed: mediaService handles photos, videos, audio
- Benefit: Easier to add video support later
- Effort: 4 hours
## Photo Attachments - Developer Guide
### Overview
The photo attachment feature allows users to attach up to 3 photos per activity.
Photos are stored in Firebase Storage and synced across devices via URLs.
### Architecture
#### Components:
- **PhotoAttachment.js**: Photo picker UI
- **PhotoGallery.js**: Full-screen photo viewer
- **ActivityCard.js**: Displays photo thumbnails
#### Services:
- **photoService.js**: Upload, delete, thumbnail generation
- **Firebase Storage**: Cloud photo storage
#### Data Structure:
```javascript
activity: {
// ... other fields
photos: [
{
url: "https://...", // Full-size photo URL
thumbnailUrl: "https://...", // Thumbnail URL (optimized)
timestamp: 1234567890, // Upload timestamp
size: 1024000 // File size in bytes
}
]
}
Uploads photo to Firebase Storage and generates thumbnail.
Parameters:
uri (string): Local file URIactivityId (string): Activity to attach photo toReturns: Promise<{ url, thumbnailUrl, timestamp, size }>
Example:
import photoService from './services/photoService'
const result = await photoService.uploadPhoto(
'file:///path/to/photo.jpg',
'activity_123'
)
// { url: "https://...", thumbnailUrl: "https://...", ... }
Deletes photo from Firebase Storage and removes from activity.
Parameters:
url (string): Full-size photo URLactivityId (string): Activity IDReturns: Promise
Run tests:
npm test -- photoService
Photo upload fails:
Thumbnail not displaying:
Permission denied:
---
## Phase 9: Deployment
**Goal**: Deploy via quality gates with staged rollout.
**Time allocation**: 15-20 minutes per tier
### Steps:
1. **Pre-deployment validation**
```bash
# Run full quality gates
./atlas-skills/atlas-full/scripts/quality-gates.sh
Update PENDING_CHANGES.md
## Title: Photo Attachments for Activities
### Changes Made:
- Added photo attachment feature (up to 3 per activity)
- Implemented photo picker (camera + gallery)
- Added full-screen photo viewer with swipe navigation
- Integrated Firebase Storage for cloud photos
- Added photo sync across devices (URLs only)
- Implemented thumbnail generation for performance
- Added offline upload queue
- Comprehensive testing across all platforms
### Testing:
- All acceptance criteria met (10/10 must-have)
- Tested on iOS, Android, Web
- Performance: Upload 2.3s, Display 140ms
- Test coverage: 87%
### Documentation:
- Updated user guide
- Added developer docs for photoService API
- Added troubleshooting guide
Deploy to QUAL (development testing)
./scripts/deploy.sh qual --all
Deploy to STAGE (internal validation)
./scripts/deploy.sh stage --all
Deploy to BETA (closed beta testing)
./scripts/deploy.sh beta --all
Deploy to PROD (production release)
./scripts/deploy.sh prod --all
Pre-Deployment:
QUAL Deployment:
STAGE Deployment:
BETA Deployment:
PROD Deployment:
Metrics to watch:
Alert thresholds:
Rollback triggers:
## Deployment Report: Photo Attachments
### QUAL Deployment ✅ (Day 1, 2pm)
- Deployed: v2025.01.20-photo-attachments
- Tested: All functionality works
- Performance: Upload 2.3s, Display 140ms
- Issues: None
- Status: ✅ Ready for STAGE
### STAGE Deployment ✅ (Day 2, 10am)
- Deployed: v2025.01.21-photo-attachments
- Internal testing: 5 team members
- Feedback:
- 👍 "Upload is fast"
- 💡 "Add photo captions" (backlog item created)
- Issues: None
- Status: ✅ Ready for BETA
### BETA Deployment ✅ (Day 3, 2pm)
- Deployed: v2025.01.22-photo-attachments
- Beta users: 50 active users
- Monitoring (24 hours):
- Adoption: 38/50 (76%) attached at least one photo
- Upload success: 98.5% (147/149 uploads)
- Error rate: 0.3% (very low)
- Performance: Upload 2.4s avg, Display 135ms avg
- User feedback:
- 👍 "Love the photo feature!"
- 👍 "Works great on Android"
- 🐛 1 user reported slow upload on 3G (acceptable)
- Issues: None critical
- Status: ✅ Ready for PROD
### PROD Deployment ✅ (Day 5, 10am)
**Phase 1: 10% rollout** (Day 5, 10am)
- Users: ~100 users
- Monitoring (4 hours):
- Adoption: 72% (good)
- Error rate: 0.4% (normal)
- Performance: Normal
- Status: ✅ Proceed to 50%
**Phase 2: 50% rollout** (Day 5, 2pm)
- Users: ~500 users
- Monitoring (8 hours):
- Adoption: 78% (excellent)
- Error rate: 0.6% (normal)
- Performance: Normal
- Firebase Storage usage: +15GB (acceptable)
- Status: ✅ Proceed to 100%
**Phase 3: 100% rollout** (Day 6, 10am)
- Users: All users (~1,000)
- Monitoring (24 hours):
- Adoption: 81% (🎯 exceeded target of 80%)
- Error rate: 0.5% (normal)
- Performance: Upload 2.5s avg, Display 142ms avg
- Firebase Storage costs: $3.20/day (within budget)
- Status: ✅ COMPLETE
### Week 1 Success Metrics: ✅ ALL TARGETS MET
| Metric | Target | Actual | Status |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| Adoption | 80%+ attach photo in week 1 | 81% | ✅ |
| Performance | Upload < 3s | 2.5s avg | ✅ |
| Performance | Display < 200ms | 142ms avg | ✅ |
| Reliability | 99%+ success rate | 99.5% | ✅ |
| Quality | Zero storage crashes | 0 crashes | ✅ |
### Post-Launch Monitoring (Day 7)
**Usage stats**:
- Total photos uploaded: 4,234
- Avg photos per user: 4.2
- Most active time: 6-9pm (evenings)
**Performance stats**:
- Upload time P50: 2.1s
- Upload time P95: 4.8s (acceptable)
- Display time P50: 120ms
- Display time P95: 310ms (acceptable)
**Cost analysis**:
- Storage cost: $22.40/week (within budget)
- Bandwidth cost: $5.30/week (acceptable)
**Issues found**:
- 2 users reported confusion about 3-photo limit → Clarified in UI (hotfix)
- 1 edge case: Photo upload during app backgrounding → Fixed in v2025.01.23
### Overall: 🎉 SUCCESS
Photo attachment feature launched successfully. All success metrics exceeded
targets. User feedback overwhelmingly positive. No critical issues. Feature
considered stable and complete.
**Next steps**:
- Monitor storage costs weekly
- Address "photo captions" feature request (backlog)
- Consider video support in Q2 (future)
Skip research phase ("I know what to build")
Skip story creation ("Requirements are clear")
Skip adversarial review ("Nothing can go wrong")
Implement everything at once ("I'll test after it's all done")
Skip documentation ("Code is self-documenting")
Deploy to production immediately ("It works on my machine")
Ignore technical debt ("We'll fix it later")
The Full workflow can leverage specialized agent skills:
Parallel agent work example:
Phase 5: Implementation
├─ Agent: Developer → Implement service layer
├─ Agent: Developer → Implement UI components
└─ Agent: Peer-Reviewer → Write comprehensive tests
(All three work in parallel, then sync at end of phase)
resources/story-template.mdresources/adversarial-checklist.mdscripts/quality-gates.sh/CLAUDE.md/docs/platform//docs/STORE_ARCHITECTURE.md/docs/features/field-conventions.md/docs/deployment/README.md(See detailed example throughout Phase 1-9 sections above)
Summary:
Total time: ~3.5 hours + 3-day staged rollout Outcome: ✅ All success metrics exceeded, zero critical defects, positive feedback
# Phase 1: Research
grep -r "feature" src/
git log --grep="similar" --oneline
# Phase 5: Implementation
npm run typecheck # Run often
npm test # After each iteration
# Phase 6: Testing
npm test
npm run typecheck
npm run lint
npm run build:web
# Phase 8: Quality Gates
./atlas-skills/atlas-full/scripts/quality-gates.sh
# Phase 9: Deployment
./scripts/deploy.sh qual --all
./scripts/deploy.sh stage --all
./scripts/deploy.sh beta --all
./scripts/deploy.sh prod --all
| Phase | Time | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Research | 20-30 min | 0:30 |
| 2. Story Creation | 15-20 min | 0:50 |
| 3. Planning | 20-30 min | 1:20 |
| 4. Adversarial Review | 15-20 min | 1:40 |
| 5. Implementation | 60-90 min | 3:10 |
| 6. Testing | 30-45 min | 3:55 |
| 7. Validation | 15-20 min | 4:15 |
| 8. Clean-up | 15-20 min | 4:35 |
| 9. Deployment | 15-20 min per tier | varies |
| Total | 2-4 hours + staged rollout |
| Characteristic | Use Full ✅ | Use Standard ❌ |
|---|---|---|
| Files affected | 6+ files | 2-5 files |
| Formal requirements | Yes | No |
| Security critical | Yes | No |
| Cross-platform coordination | Yes | Simple |
| Stakeholder sign-off | Required | Not required |
| Epic-level work | Yes | Task-level |
| Comprehensive testing | Required | Standard tests OK |
| Documentation | Extensive | Standard |
The Full workflow is for complex, critical features that require:
Use Full workflow when:
Don't use Full workflow when:
When in doubt, start with Standard and escalate to Full if complexity emerges.
Remember: The Full workflow ensures 100% acceptance, zero defects, and complete evidence. It's rigorous because the stakes are high. Take the time to do it right. 🚀
Based on SOC occupation classification