cgit-commit

# Git Commit Create a single, well-crafted git commit from the current working tree changes. ## Workflow ### Step 1: Gather context Run these commands to understand the current state. ```bash git status git diff HEAD git branch --show-current git log --oneline -10 git rev-parse --abbrev-ref origin/HEAD ``` The last command returns the remote default branch (e.g., `origin/main`). Strip the `origin/` prefix to get the branch name. If the command fails or returns a bare `HEAD`, try: ```bash gh repo view --json defaultBranchRef --jq '.defaultBranchRef.name' ``` If both fail, fall back to `main`. If the `git status` result shows a clean working tree (no staged, modified, or untracked files), report that there is nothing to commit and stop. If `git branch --show-current` returns empty, the repository is in detached HEAD state. Ask whether to create a feature branch now using `#askQuestions`. If the user agrees, derive the name from the change content and create it with `git checkout -b <branch-name>`. If the user declines, continue with the detached HEAD commit. ### Step 2: Determine commit message convention Follow this priority order: 1. **Repo conventions already in context** — If project instructions (AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, or similar) are already loaded and specify commit message conventions, follow those. 2. **Recent commit history** — If no explicit convention is documented, examine the 10 most recent commits. If a clear pattern emerges (e.g., conventional commits, ticket prefixes, emoji prefixes), match it. 3. **Default: conventional commits** — `type(scope): description` where type is one of `feat`, `fix`, `docs`, `refactor`, `test`, `chore`, `perf`, `ci`, `style`, `build`. ### Step 3: Consider logical commits Before staging everything together, scan the changed files for naturally distinct concerns. If modified files clearly group into separate logical changes (e.g., a refactor in one directory and a new feature in another), create separate commits for each group. Keep this lightweight: - Group at the **file level only** — do not try to split hunks within a file. - If the separation is obvious (different features, unrelated fixes), split. If ambiguous, one commit is fine. - Two or three logical commits is the sweet spot. Do not over-slice. ### Step 4: Stage and commit Check if on the default branch (`main`, `master`, or resolved default). If so, warn the user and ask whether to continue or create a feature branch first using `#askQuestions`. Stage relevant files by name. Prefer staging specific files over `git add -A` or `git add .` to avoid accidentally including sensitive files (.env, credentials) or unrelated changes. Write the commit message: - **Subject line**: Concise, imperative mood, focused on *why* not *what*. Follow the convention from Step 2. - **Body** (when needed): Add a body separated by a blank line for non-trivial changes. Explain motivation, trade-offs, or anything a future reader would need. Omit for obvious single-purpose changes. Use a heredoc to preserve formatting: ```bash git commit -m "$(cat <<'EOF' type(scope): subject line here Optional body explaining why this change was made, not just what changed. EOF )" ``` ### Step 5: Confirm Run `git status` after the commit to verify success. Report the commit hash(es) and subject line(s).