AliManjotho/open-reviewer

abstract-validation

Validate abstract completeness, length, and alignment.

anti-hallucination-grounding

Enforce evidence-grounded outputs with explicit uncertainty.

citation-ethics-screen

Screen for excessive self-citation and suspicious citation patterns.

cross-section-consistency

Run contradiction and alignment checks across all sections.

discussion-limitations-review

Check interpretation quality, limitations, and overclaiming.

evidence-anchoring

Create stable anchors for sections, paragraphs, figures, tables, equations, and references.

experimental-rigor-review

Review datasets, baselines, metrics, fairness, and leakage risks.

figure-table-deep-check

Review figures and tables for caption quality, linkage, and alignment.

issue-normalization

Normalize issues into a single production schema.

language-quality-review

Checklist for grammar, clarity, terminology, and abbreviations.

math-symbol-consistency

Check equations, notation, and symbol definitions.

meta-review-synthesis

Generate final scorecard, recommendation, and executive summary.

methodology-technical-review

Review assumptions, completeness, logic, and design rationale.

novelty-contribution-assessment

Evaluate contribution clarity, distinctness, and non-triviality.

paper-ingest-pdf

Normalize raw paper inputs into a stable parsed structure.

red-flag-synthesis

Aggregate ethical, integrity, and suspicious-pattern warnings.

reference-integrity-check

Validate reference list quality and citation/reference alignment.

related-work-validation

Review related work accuracy, relevance, and gap legitimacy.

results-claims-verification

Verify that results support claims and surface red flags.

section-review-reporting

Format section-wise findings into a consistent review payload.

severity-scoring

Assign issue severity consistently.

structure-organization-review

Validate section order, transitions, hierarchy, and caption linkage.