Drives preprint deposition across servers (arXiv, bioRxiv, medRxiv, SSRN, OSF Preprints): picks the right server by field, prepares submission metadata, sets the license (arXiv offers CC BY/BY-SA/BY-NC-SA/BY-NC-ND 4.0, the arXiv non-exclusive license, or CC0; bioRxiv/medRxiv offer CC BY/BY-NC/BY-ND/BY-NC-ND/CC0 or No-reuse), maps arXiv category taxonomy, handles immutable versioning and preprint DOIs, checks a journal's preprint/self-archiving policy via the Sherpa Romeo v2 API, and links the posted preprint to the published article. Reuses alterlab-arxiv and alterlab-biorxiv for metadata and alterlab-open-science for data-repository choice. Use when depositing a preprint, choosing a preprint server, preparing an arXiv or bioRxiv submission, setting a preprint license, or checking journal preprint policy; for Zenodo/Dryad/Figshare data deposition prefer alterlab-open-science, for TÜBİTAK Aperta prefer alterlab-aperta. Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
A direct command skips the review prompt. Inspect the source before running it.
The command stays on one line. Scroll horizontally to inspect it before copying.
Prefer a local copy? Download the files currently available to SkillsMP.
File Explorer
9 files
Showing SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Source instructions · Read-only preview
name
alterlab-preprint-deposition
description
Drives preprint deposition across servers (arXiv, bioRxiv, medRxiv, SSRN, OSF Preprints): picks the right server by field, prepares submission metadata, sets the license (arXiv offers CC BY/BY-SA/BY-NC-SA/BY-NC-ND 4.0, the arXiv non-exclusive license, or CC0; bioRxiv/medRxiv offer CC BY/BY-NC/BY-ND/BY-NC-ND/CC0 or No-reuse), maps arXiv category taxonomy, handles immutable versioning and preprint DOIs, checks a journal's preprint/self-archiving policy via the Sherpa Romeo v2 API, and links the posted preprint to the published article. Reuses alterlab-arxiv and alterlab-biorxiv for metadata and alterlab-open-science for data-repository choice. Use when depositing a preprint, choosing a preprint server, preparing an arXiv or bioRxiv submission, setting a preprint license, or checking journal preprint policy; for Zenodo/Dryad/Figshare data deposition prefer alterlab-open-science, for TÜBİTAK Aperta prefer alterlab-aperta. Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.
license
MIT
allowed-tools
Read Write Edit Bash(python:*) WebFetch
compatibility
No API key required for the deposition workflow itself. Optional Python helpers run via `uv run python` (stdlib-only, requests optional). The journal-policy check uses the Sherpa Romeo v2 API, which requires a free registered api-key; the bioRxiv/medRxiv preprint-to-publication check uses the keyless api.biorxiv.org content API.
Preprint Deposition — Pick a Server, Prepare the Submission, Link the Published Version
The write/deposit side of preprinting. Given a finished manuscript, this
skill turns "I want to post a preprint" into a concrete, server-specific plan:
which server fits the field, what metadata and category to enter,
which license to choose (and what it commits you to), how versioning and
the preprint DOI work, whether the target journal even allows a preprint,
and how to link the preprint to the article once it is published.
It is deliberately the deposit-side complement to the read-side connectors
alterlab-arxiv and alterlab-biorxiv (which search and fetch preprints) and
to alterlab-open-science (which chooses data repositories and writes DMPs).
This skill does not reimplement their search/metadata code — it calls them.
Quick Start
I finished a CS paper — how do I post it to arXiv? Which category and license?
Should this biology manuscript go on bioRxiv or medRxiv?
Does Elsevier's journal X allow me to post a preprint before submission?
My preprint just got accepted — how do I link the published DOI to the arXiv version?
What license should I pick on arXiv if I might publish in a closed journal later?
→ Identify the field → route to a server (see the matrix) → assemble metadata →
choose a license → run the journal-policy check before posting → after
acceptance, link the published DOI back to the preprint.
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when the user wants to act on a preprint — post it, choose
where, prepare its metadata/license, or reconcile it with a journal or a
published version. Core jobs:
Server selection — match field + manuscript type to arXiv, bioRxiv,
medRxiv, SSRN, or OSF Preprints. See references/server_selection.md.
cross-list categories** or bioRxiv/medRxiv subject collection, funding,
declarations. See references/submission_metadata.md.
License choice — pick from each server's actual license set and explain
the downstream commitment (e.g. CC BY is irrevocable; a later journal may
object to a permissive preprint license). See references/licensing.md.
Versioning & DOI — arXiv versions (v1, v2, …) are ; a withdrawal is a version with a tombstone, never a
deletion; bioRxiv/medRxiv assign a DOI on posting and accept revisions.
immutable and
permanent
new
Journal preprint policy — query the Sherpa Romeo v2 API for the
target journal's prearchiving (preprint) policy before posting. See
references/journal_policy.md.
Post-publication linking — connect the preprint to the published article
(publisher field on the server; the keyless api.biorxiv.org/pubs/
endpoint surfaces bioRxiv→journal links).
Does NOT Trigger — route adjacent requests to the right sibling
The request is really about…
Route to
Why not here
Searching / fetching existing arXiv preprints, resolving an arXiv ID
alterlab-arxiv
Read-side connector; this skill deposits, it does not search
Searching / fetching existing bioRxiv preprints for a lit review
alterlab-biorxiv
Read-side connector
Choosing a data repository (Zenodo, Dryad, Figshare), writing a grant DMP, preregistration, FAIR
alterlab-open-science
That is data/DMP/repository policy, not manuscript preprinting
Depositing to TÜBİTAK Aperta, the açık bilim mandate, a VYP
alterlab-aperta
National Turkish open-science track with its own embargo rules
Whether cited references actually exist / hallucinated DOIs
alterlab-citation-verifier
Existence-verification, not deposition
Dead-link / 404 checks across a bibliography
alterlab-link-health
HTTP reachability, not preprint posting
Picking a target journal / formatting for journal submission
alterlab-open-science (OA route) then the journal's own guide
This skill only checks whether a journal permits a preprint
This skill answers "how and where do I deposit this manuscript as a preprint,
and is that compatible with my journal plans?" It makes no claim about
manuscript quality, novelty, or whether the work should be published.
Server Matrix (summary — full detail in references/server_selection.md)
No native DOI (arXiv ID is canonical; DataCite DOIs available)
arXiv non-exclusive license, or CC BY / BY-SA / BY-NC-SA / BY-NC-ND 4.0 / CC0
Moderation + endorsement for new submitters
bioRxiv
life sciences / biology
Yes (CSHL-issued DOI)
CC BY / BY-NC / BY-ND / BY-NC-ND / CC0 / No-reuse
Basic screening
medRxiv
clinical / health sciences
Yes (CSHL-issued DOI)
Same license set as bioRxiv
Screening incl. ethics/▲non-trial checks
SSRN
social sciences, economics, law, humanities
DOI varies by network
Author selects; SSRN posting terms
Light screening
OSF Preprints
multi/cross-disciplinary + community servers
Yes (DOI via OSF)
CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-NC-ND / No license
Per-provider
Category/license rows above name the real option sets each server
presents at submission. License implications (irrevocability, journal
friction) are in references/licensing.md; never assert a "best" license
without stating the trade-off.
Workflow
1. Determine the field and route to a server
Read the manuscript's domain. STEM-formal (physics/math/CS/stat/eess/econ/q-bio/
q-fin) → arXiv. Biology → bioRxiv. Clinical/health → medRxiv.
Social science/law/economics → SSRN (or arXiv econ). Cross-disciplinary or a
field-specific community server → OSF Preprints. Edge cases and the full
decision tree live in references/server_selection.md.
2. Run the journal-policy check FIRST (if a target journal is known)
Before posting, confirm the intended journal permits preprints. Use
scripts/journal_policy.py to query the Sherpa Romeo v2 API
(https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/cgi/retrieve, item-type=publication, requires a
free api-key). Report the journal's prearchiving (preprint) permission,
any conditions (embargo, version allowed, required statement), and link the
source. If no key is available, fall back to WebFetch on the publisher's policy
page and say so. Details: references/journal_policy.md.
Most major publishers permit preprints, but conditions vary (some bar posting
the accepted version, some require a DOI link or a specific notice). Never
assert a policy from memory — verify it per journal.
3. Assemble submission metadata
Build the metadata block the server needs: title, all authors with ORCID and
affiliations, abstract, arXiv primary category + optional cross-lists (or
bioRxiv/medRxiv subject collection), declarations (competing interests, funding,
data/code availability, ethics/IRB for medRxiv), and the manuscript PDF. The
canonical field-by-field checklist is in references/submission_metadata.md.
To look up an existing arXiv/bioRxiv record's metadata for reuse, defer to
alterlab-arxiv / alterlab-biorxiv rather than re-querying here.
4. Choose the license deliberately
Present the actual license set for the chosen server (see the matrix), then
explain the commitment:
CC BY 4.0 — maximum reuse; irrevocable; some closed-access journals
dislike a permissive preprint and may ask you to change it (you cannot revoke
CC BY on already-posted versions).
arXiv non-exclusive license 1.0 — arXiv-specific; you keep copyright,
grant arXiv a distribution license; the least journal-friction option on arXiv.
CC BY-NC-*/-ND — narrower reuse; check it against any funder open-access
mandate (e.g. cOAlition S Plan S generally requires CC BY).
CC0 — public-domain dedication; broadest, also irrevocable.
Confirm whether a funder mandate forces a specific license before recommending.
Full table + funder-mandate notes: references/licensing.md.
5. Post, then manage versions
After posting: record the arXiv ID / preprint DOI and the version.
Revisions are replacements (arXiv) or new versions (bioRxiv/medRxiv) — the old
version stays public and immutable. Do not advise "deleting" an announced
arXiv paper; that is impossible — only a withdrawal-version with a tombstone.
6. Link the published article after acceptance
When the paper is published, link the DOI back to the preprint (the server's
"published in" / publisher field; bioRxiv/medRxiv auto-detect many links and
expose them via api.biorxiv.org/pubs/{server}/...). This makes the version
of record discoverable from the preprint and vice versa.
Scripts
scripts/journal_policy.py — query the Sherpa Romeo v2 API for a journal's
preprint/self-archiving policy by ISSN or title (needs a free --api-key;
prints a structured summary; degrades to a manual-check instruction offline).
scripts/server_recommender.py — given a few flags (field, has-clinical-data,
target-journal-known, needs-DOI), prints a recommended server + license
shortlist with the trade-offs, from the rules in references/server_selection.md.
scripts/preprint_link_check.py — query the keyless api.biorxiv.org/details/ and /pubs/ endpoints to confirm a bioRxiv/medRxiv DOI exists and
surface any detected preprint→published-article link.
All scripts are stdlib-first (use requests if present, else urllib), run in a
bare uv run python, and never require a key except the Sherpa Romeo lookup.
Self-Check Before Reporting
Did I verify the journal's preprint policy (Sherpa Romeo or the live
publisher page), or did I assert it from memory? Only the former is allowed.
Did I name the server's real license options and state the irrevocability
/ journal-friction trade-off, not a bare "use CC BY"?
Did I route a search/fetch request to alterlab-arxiv/alterlab-biorxiv,
and a data-repository/DMP request to alterlab-open-science, and a TÜBİTAK
request to alterlab-aperta, instead of handling it here?
Did I avoid telling the user to "delete" an already-announced arXiv preprint?
References
references/server_selection.md — full server decision tree, field-by-field.
references/submission_metadata.md — per-server metadata field checklist.