Skip to main content

analyze-impact

Analyze the impact of a proposed change on features and dependencies

Source facts

Repository
asermax/claude-plugins
Last source activity
February 8, 2026 at 18:28
Detected SKILL.md language
English
Stars
1
Forks
1

Install options

The review-first prompt is selected by default. You can switch to a direct command or download a local copy.

Review the source files

Read SKILL.md and any companion files shown by SkillsMP before deciding whether to install.

Showing SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Source instructions · Read-only preview
name
analyze-impact
description
Analyze the impact of a proposed change on features and dependencies
argument-hint
[change description]
disable-model-invocation
true
# Analyze Impact Analyze the impact of a proposed change on existing features, dependencies, and documentation. ## Input Change description: $ARGUMENTS (optional - will prompt if not provided) ## Context **You must load the following skills and read the following files before proceeding.** ### Skills - `katachi:iterative-development` - Impact analysis workflow ### Feature documentation - `docs/feature-specs/README.md` - Feature capability index - `docs/feature-designs/README.md` - Feature design index - Read specific feature-specs/ and feature-designs/ docs as needed ### Decision indexes - `docs/architecture/README.md` - Architecture decisions (ADRs) - `docs/design/README.md` - Design patterns (DES) ## Pre-Check Verify framework is initialized: - If `docs/planning/` doesn't exist, explain this command requires initialized framework - If minimal features exist, note the analysis may be limited ## Process ### 1. Capture Change Description If not provided in arguments, ask: ``` "Describe the change you're considering: - What are you planning to change? - Why is this change needed? - What areas do you think might be affected?" ``` ### 2. Dispatch Impact Analyzer ```python Task( subagent_type="katachi:impact-analyzer", prompt=f""" Analyze the impact of this proposed change. ## Change Description {change_description} ## Feature Specs Index {feature_specs_readme} ## Feature Designs Index {feature_designs_readme} ## Feature Spec Paths {list_of_feature_spec_paths} ## Feature Design Paths {list_of_feature_design_paths} ## ADR Index {adr_readme} ## DES Index {des_readme} """ ) ``` ### 3. Present Findings Show the analysis results in a clear format: ``` ## Impact Analysis ### Change Summary [What's being changed] ### Risk Level: [Isolated | Moderate | Significant | Structural] ### Directly Affected Features | Feature | Impact | Reason | |---------|--------|--------| | CORE-001 | High | [reason] | | API-002 | Medium | [reason] | ### Transitively Affected Features | Feature | Path | Impact | |---------|------|--------| | UI-003 | CORE-001 → UI-003 | Medium | ### Documents Requiring Updates - docs/feature-specs/CORE-001.md - Update acceptance criteria for X - docs/feature-designs/API-002.md - Revise data flow for Y - docs/architecture/ADR-005.md - Consider superseding ### Recommendations 1. [Action item] 2. [Action item] ``` ### 4. Discuss Next Steps Based on risk level, offer appropriate next steps: **Isolated (1-2 features, no transitive):** ``` "This is a contained change. You can proceed with implementation. Would you like to: A) Start implementing (update affected specs first) B) See more details about affected features C) Cancel and reconsider" ``` **Moderate (3-5 features or limited transitive):** ``` "This change has moderate impact. I recommend reviewing affected specs before proceeding. Would you like to: A) Review affected specs B) Create an ADR to document this decision C) See the full dependency chain D) Cancel and reconsider" ``` **Significant (5+ features or broad transitive):** ``` "This is a significant change with broad impact. I recommend: 1. Creating an ADR to document the decision and rationale 2. Reviewing all affected specs and designs Would you like to: A) Create an ADR for this change B) Review affected documents C) Cancel and reconsider" ``` **Structural (architecture or cross-cutting):** ``` "This change affects core architecture and has structural implications. Before proceeding, I strongly recommend: 1. Creating an ADR with thorough alternatives analysis 2. Reviewing all affected areas in detail This is a significant decision. Would you like to: A) Start a detailed architecture discussion B) Create an ADR to explore options C) See affected areas in detail D) Cancel and reconsider" ``` ### 5. Execute Chosen Action **Review affected specs:** - Read and summarize each affected spec - Highlight which acceptance criteria are impacted - Ask which to update **Create ADR:** - Transition to `/katachi:decision` - Pre-fill context with impact analysis ## Integration with Other Commands This command integrates with: - `/katachi:decision` - For documenting significant changes as ADR or DES - `/katachi:add-delta` - When change requires new work (delta) to implement - Direct feature spec/design updates - When updating existing feature documentation ## Workflow This is an informational command: - Gather change description - Dispatch agent for analysis - Present findings clearly - Offer appropriate next steps based on risk - Execute user's chosen action
View on GitHub