| name | cpu-gpu-performance |
| description | Establishes CPU/GPU baselines before resource-intensive operations. Use before builds, training runs, or any task that pins cores or GPUs for over a minute. |
| alwaysApply | false |
| progressive_loading | true |
| dependencies | {"hub":["token-conservation"],"modules":[]} |
| model_hint | standard |
Table of Contents
CPU/GPU Performance Discipline
When To Use
- At the beginning of every session (auto-load alongside
token-conservation).
- Whenever you plan to build, train, or test anything that could pin CPU cores
or GPUs for more than a minute.
- Before retrying a failing command that previously consumed significant resources.
When NOT To Use
- Simple operations with no resource impact
- Quick single-file operations
Required TodoWrite Items
cpu-gpu-performance:baseline
cpu-gpu-performance:scope
cpu-gpu-performance:instrument
cpu-gpu-performance:throttle
cpu-gpu-performance:log
Step 1: Establish Current Baseline
-
Capture current utilization:
uptime
ps -eo pcpu,cmd | head
nvidia-smi --query-gpu=utilization.gpu,memory.used --format=csv
Note which hosts/GPUs are already busy.
-
Record any CI/cluster budgets (time quotas, GPU hours) before launching work.
-
Set a per-task CPU minute / GPU minute budget that respects those limits.
Step 2: Narrow the Scope
- Avoid running "whole world" jobs after a small fix. Prefer diff-based
or tag-based selective testing:
pytest -k
- Bazel target patterns
cargo test <module>
- Batch low-level fixes so you can validate multiple changes with a single targeted command.
- For GPU jobs, favor unit-scale smoke inputs or lower epoch counts before
scheduling the full training/eval sweep.
Step 3: Instrument Before You Optimize
- Pick the right profiler/monitor:
- CPU work:
perf
intel vtune
cargo flamegraph
- language-specific profilers
- GPU work:
nvidia-smi dmon
nsys
nvprof
- DLProf
- framework timeline tracers
- Capture kernel/ops timelines, memory footprints, and data pipeline latency
so you have evidence when throttling or parallelizing.
- Record hot paths and I/O bottlenecks in notes so future reruns can jump straight to the culprit.
Step 4: Throttle and Sequence Work
- Use
nice, ionice, or Kubernetes/Slurm quotas to prevent starvation of shared nodes.
- Chain heavy tasks with guardrails:
- Rerun only the failed test/module
- Then (optionally) escalate to the next-wider shard
- Reserve the full suite for the final gate
- Stagger GPU kernels (smaller batch sizes or gradient accumulation) when memory
pressure risks eviction; prefer checkpoint/restore over restarts.
Step 5: Log Decisions and Next Steps
Conclude by documenting the commands that were run and their resource cost
(duration, CPU%, GPU%), confirming whether they remained within the per-task
budget. If a full suite or long training run was necessary, justify why selective
or staged approaches were not feasible. Capture any follow-up tasks, such as
adding a new test marker or profiling documentation, to simplify future sessions.
Output Expectations
- Brief summary covering:
- baseline metrics
- scope chosen
- instrumentation captured
- throttling tactics
- follow-up items
- Concrete example(s) of what ran (e.g.):
- "reran
pytest tests/test_orders.py -k test_refund instead of pytest -m slow"
- "profiled
nvidia-smi dmon output to prove GPU idle time before scaling"
Exit Criteria