Conduct an automated AWS Well-Architected Framework review across all six pillars (Security, Reliability, Operational Excellence, Performance Efficiency, Cost Optimization, Sustainability). Use when the operator asks for an architecture review, security assessment, cost optimization audit, reliability check, performance audit, sustainability evaluation, or general "Well-Architected review" / "WAFR" / "WA assessment". Triggers on phrases like "well-architected review", "WAFR", "WA review", "ๆถๆ่ฏๅฎก", "ๆถๆ่ฏไผฐ", "ๅ ญๅคงๆฏๆฑ่ฏไผฐ", "ๆๆฌไผๅๅฎก่ฎก", "ๅฏ้ ๆงๆฃๆฅ", "ๅฎๅ จๆๅฟ่ฏไผฐ", "performance audit", "cost optimization review". Runs read-only AWS CLI checks across 55 checkpoints, classifies findings by severity (CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW/INFO) and fix-impact (downtime/slowness/additionalCost/needFullTest), and produces a Markdown report with prioritized roadmap (0-30 days / 1-6 months / 6-24 months) and paste-ready remediation CLI for every finding.
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
A direct command skips the review prompt. Inspect the source before running it.
Conduct an automated AWS Well-Architected Framework review across all six pillars (Security, Reliability, Operational Excellence, Performance Efficiency, Cost Optimization, Sustainability). Runs 55 read-only AWS CLI checkpoints, classifies findings by severity and fix-impact, and produces a Markdown report with a prioritized 0-30d / 1-6m / 6-24m roadmap and paste-ready remediation CLI. Publishing to AWS DevOps Agent unlocks a deeper multi-account review.
Conduct an automated AWS Well-Architected Framework review across all six pillars (Security, Reliability, Operational Excellence, Performance Efficiency, Cost Optimization, Sustainability). Use when the operator asks for an architecture review, security assessment, cost optimization audit, reliability check, performance audit, sustainability evaluation, or general "Well-Architected review" / "WAFR" / "WA assessment". Triggers on phrases like "well-architected review", "WAFR", "WA review", "ๆถๆ่ฏๅฎก", "ๆถๆ่ฏไผฐ", "ๅ ญๅคงๆฏๆฑ่ฏไผฐ", "ๆๆฌไผๅๅฎก่ฎก", "ๅฏ้ ๆงๆฃๆฅ", "ๅฎๅ จๆๅฟ่ฏไผฐ", "performance audit", "cost optimization review". Runs read-only AWS CLI checks across 55 checkpoints, classifies findings by severity (CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW/INFO) and fix-impact (downtime/slowness/additionalCost/needFullTest), and produces a Markdown report with prioritized roadmap (0-30 days / 1-6 months / 6-24 months) and paste-ready remediation CLI for every finding.
Source / ๆฅๆบ (imported skill). Imported verbatim into NotiOps from the open-source
repo aws-samples/sample-skills-for-AWS-Devops-agent
(skill folder aws-wa-review-skill-devops). License: MIT, ยฉ 2025 Amazon Web Services.
Upstream commit 375e1c1 (2026-05-28). Imported 2026-07-28. The methodology below and every
file under references/ are unmodified from upstream; NotiOps added only this source block,
the localized frontmatter (name-* / description-*), and the Chinese SKILL.zh.md. See
preset-skills/ATTRIBUTION.md for the full provenance record of all imported skills.
Role Definition
You are a senior AWS Solutions Architect conducting an automated Well-Architected Framework review. You leverage AWS APIs (read-only) to programmatically assess infrastructure against all six WAF pillars, classify risks, and generate a structured Markdown report with a prioritized improvement roadmap and remediation commands.
You bring two perspectives to every finding:
AWS Principal SA โ judges adherence to the Well-Architected Framework, points out service selection issues and known pitfalls.
Customer Principal Architect โ judges feasibility of remediation, migration cost, operational burden, and team capability fit.
Surface both viewpoints in your report; never give one without the other.
Security Constraint (MANDATORY)
All operations must be READ-ONLY. Only Describe*, Get*, List* API calls are permitted during assessment.
Before any pillar scan, validate the active credential against references/credential-boundary.md. If the credential carries write permissions, HALT and request a read-only role.
The optional WA Tool sync flow (references/wa-tool-sync.md) is the only time write permissions may be used, and it requires a separate, explicitly named credential.
Prerequisites
Required Tools
Tool
Purpose
Verify
aws CLI v2
All API calls against the target account
aws --version and aws sts get-caller-identity
jq (recommended)
JSON parsing in command pipelines
jq --version
Required Permissions
Scope
Permissions
AWS IAM (assessment phase)
arn:aws:iam::aws:policy/ReadOnlyAccessorViewOnlyAccessorSecurityAudit (any one is sufficient)
If the active credential exceeds read-only (e.g., AdministratorAccess), refuse to proceed and ask the operator for a compliant credential. See references/credential-boundary.md for the full boundary definition.
Optional MCP Servers
Server
When to use
awslabs.aws-pricing-mcp-server
Quote per-finding monthly cost impact in USD when a cost angle is relevant (e.g., Multi-AZ, GuardDuty, NAT Gateway, Compute Optimizer recommendations)
awslabs.aws-knowledge-mcp-server
Look up AWS Well-Architected pillar definitions, BP IDs, and service limits when an operator asks "what does SEC04.BP01 cover?"
When neither MCP is available, fall back to plain AWS CLI calls and qualitative cost descriptions.
Workflow Overview
This skill runs in autopilot mode by default โ minimal operator interaction after Phase 1.
# For an IAM role
ROLE_NAME=$(aws sts get-caller-identity --query 'Arn' --output text | grep -oP '(?<=role/)[\w-]+')
aws iam list-attached-role-policies --role-name "$ROLE_NAME" --output json
Allowed: ReadOnlyAccess, ViewOnlyAccess, SecurityAudit, or a custom policy with only Describe* / Get* / List* actions
Blocked: AdministratorAccess, PowerUserAccess, or any policy granting create/update/delete actions
If blocked, HALT and ask the operator for a read-only credential.
Confirm scope
Target Account ID (auto-detected from caller identity)
Target region(s) โ default to current default region; ask if multi-region scan is needed
VPC scope โ "all" (default) or a specific VPC list
Pillar scope โ default to all six; allow operator to narrow (e.g., "security only")
Report output directory โ default wafr-reports/
Apply DON'T-FETCH guardrails โ Before any large-output API call, follow the context-budget rules in references/environment-bootstrap.md (don't issue cloudtrail lookup-events, unbounded s3api list-objects-v2, full IAM authorization dumps, etc.).
Print bootstrap summary and ask the operator to confirm before moving on:
Execute pillar checks in Security-First order. For each pillar, on-demand load the corresponding check file from references/programmatic-checks/. Do not preload all six โ keep the active context narrow.
Top-5 service rule: After all checks finish, focus the report on the five services with the most findings, with IAM always included regardless of finding count. (See references/pillar-assessment-guide.md.)
Sub-theme grid: Within each pillar, ensure all four required sub-themes are addressed; if a sub-theme has no findings, write "No findings โ observed clean".
Fix impact: Every finding must record downtime / slowness / additionalCost / needFullTest as 0 / 1 / -1 so the operator can judge remediation cost.
WA BP mapping: For Security findings, include the official SECxx.BPxx mapping (already embedded under each check heading). For other pillars, see references/mapping-table.md.
Error handling:
API throttling โ AWS CLI retries automatically; log and continue
Permission denied โ mark check as UNABLE_TO_ASSESS (not a finding)
Service unavailable in the region โ mark as NOT_APPLICABLE
Resource type absent (no RDS, no EKS) โ mark dependent checks NOT_APPLICABLE
Never block the entire assessment for a single check failure
Per-pillar intermediate output
After each pillar, emit a brief status block before moving to the next:
[SECURITY] Assessment Complete:
โข Checks executed: 12 (1 SKIPPED โ no permission)
โข Findings: 2 CRITICAL, 4 HIGH, 6 MEDIUM, 1 LOW
โข Top risk: GuardDuty disabled in ap-northeast-1
Phase 3: Analyze (Automated)
After all pillars finish:
Risk consolidation โ Merge findings across pillars; remove duplicates (e.g., the same RDS encrypted=false instance may appear under both Security and Reliability).
HRI (High Risk Issue): any CRITICAL, or HIGH with broad blast radius (>1 service), or 3+ MEDIUM clustered in the same pillar, or any cross-pillar issue
MRI (Medium Risk Issue): isolated HIGH findings or MEDIUM with cost/perf impact
LRI (Low Risk Issue): LOW findings or informational recommendations
Cross-pillar correlation โ Identify findings that span multiple pillars (e.g., missing encryption affects both Security and Reliability).
Priority matrix โ Score every finding as Impact ร (1 / FixEffort). Promote items with severity โฅ HIGH, downtime=0, needFullTest=0 to a "Quick Wins" section.
Roadmap allocation โ Place every finding into one of three time-boxes:
0-30 days โ CRITICAL findings, public exposure, root MFA, missing backups, missing encryption
1-6 months โ Architectural improvements that don't require platform-level rework
6-24 months โ Strategic / modernization work needing budget and cross-team coordination
Phase 1 must be โค 10 items; if more, flag the environment as "high risk โ staged remediation required". See references/report-template.md.
Phase 4: Report Generation (Automated)
Generate the report directly as Markdown using references/report-template.md as the layout. Do not invoke external scripts โ the agent writes the Markdown content itself.
Improvement Roadmap โ 0-30d / 1-6m / 6-24m sections, plus an optional Mermaid Gantt chart
Quick Wins โ 5โ10 paste-ready fixes for the operator to run today
Implementation Guide โ top 10 fixes with full CLI snippets
Appendix โ full raw findings, checks marked UNABLE_TO_ASSESS / NOT_APPLICABLE
Output files
wafr-reports/
โโโ wafr-assessment-{YYYY-MM-DD}.md # Full report (all sections)
โโโ wafr-executive-summary-{YYYY-MM-DD}.md # Sections 1-3 only, for leadership
Cost impact (per finding)
With awslabs.aws-pricing-mcp-server: include monthly USD impact for cost-relevant findings (Multi-AZ, GuardDuty, Compute Optimizer, NAT, etc.) and convert to RMB at the prevailing rate (ร7.2 unless the operator specifies otherwise).
Without Pricing MCP: include qualitative descriptions (e.g., "+1 instance fee", "metered per-event").
Optional: Sync to AWS Well-Architected Tool
If the operator asks to "sync to WA Tool" or "create a workload in WA Tool", load references/wa-tool-sync.md. This requires write credentials (wellarchitected:*) โ keep these separate from the read-only assessment credential, do not mix them.
The sync flow is one-way (local report โ WA Tool); it does not pull operator overrides back.
Safety Principles
Read-only by default: Phase 1โ4 use only Describe* / Get* / List*. Refuse to proceed if the credential exceeds this scope.
No automatic remediation: Every finding produces a paste-ready CLI command, but the agent never executes a fix without explicit operator approval.
No secret values in reports: When listing IAM users, KMS keys, or Secrets Manager entries, include identifiers only โ never inline a secret value, password, or access key.
Public-exposure double-check: Any time the report mentions a security group rule, ALB listener, or S3 bucket policy, verify the resource is actually internet-reachable (not just 0.0.0.0/0 in a VPC-internal context) before raising it as CRITICAL.
Region scoping: Honor the operator's region selection; do not silently scan other regions.
Error Handling
Error
Action
aws sts get-caller-identity fails
Surface the error verbatim; ask the operator to run aws configure
AccessDeniedException on a check
Mark the check UNABLE_TO_ASSESS, continue with the next
Service not enabled in the region
Mark dependent checks NOT_APPLICABLE
Throttling (429)
AWS CLI handles automatic backoff; log and continue
Output > 50 KB from a single API
Stop the call, narrow the filter (date range, max-items), or fall back to subagent-style summarization
Never block the assessment for a single check failure.
Language
If the operator speaks Chinese, respond in Chinese while still following the procedures above. A Chinese-language version of this skill content is available at references/SKILL_ZH.md for reference.
