cao-session-liveness

name	cao-session-liveness
description	Verify whether a CAO session is actually alive and what it really said, before reporting progress or completion to a user. Use alongside cao-session-management whenever you launch, poll, or report on a CAO session — especially when a session appears stalled, a send times out, or a status value looks inconsistent with the output.

CAO Session Liveness

Companion to cao-session-management, which covers the mechanics of launching and messaging sessions. This skill covers a single question that mechanics alone cannot answer: is the session actually alive, and is the status telling me the truth?

Why this matters

Every CAO provider infers agent state by pattern-matching the rendered terminal screen. There is no structured protocol between CAO and the provider CLI. A provider that has exited, crashed, or stalled on an unanswerable dialog can leave a screen that still matches an idle or processing pattern.

The consequence is specific and it is the failure this skill exists to prevent: reporting progress on a session that is already dead.

The two-signal rule

Never report readiness, progress, or completion from a status value alone. Always corroborate with output before you tell a user anything:

1. Read the status (get_terminal_status, or cao session status SESSION).
2. Read the output tail (read_session_output / get_terminal_output, or cao session status SESSION --json and inspect last_output).
3. If the two disagree, the output wins.

A status of idle with an output tail showing a shell prompt means the CLI exited. Report the session as dead, not as ready.

Dead-session discriminators

Treat any of the following in the output tail as proof the provider is no longer running, regardless of the reported status:

Signal	Means
Session ended. / Resume with: <cli> --resume-id ...	The CLI exited on its own
error: Conflicting options: or a usage/help banner	The CLI rejected its launch flags and never started
API Error (...), 400, or a model/auth failure	The provider started but cannot reach a model
A bare shell prompt with a directory and timestamp, no agent chrome	The pane fell back to the shell
An output read that fails with an extraction error	No response boundary on screen; corroborate before trusting

A session parked in waiting_user_answer that never advances is usually stalled on a dialog nothing will answer. Treat it as dead weight, report it to the user, and do not silently kill it.

Not a dead session: a finished handoff worker

A blocking handoff tears its worker down once it returns. The worker terminal ID the conductor reports was valid during the call and is gone afterwards, so querying it later is expected to fail:

• get_terminal_status / GET /terminals/<id> returns not-found
• cao session status SESSION --workers lists no workers

Neither is evidence the conductor invented the delegation. Confirm a handoff from the conductor's own transcript — a full-mode output read showing the handoff tool call, its agent_profile, and the returned output — not from the terminal registry. Only a non-blocking assign leaves a worker alive to query.

Do not accuse a conductor of fabricating a delegation on the strength of a missing terminal alone.

Verify a provider before depending on it

Provider reliability varies, is version-sensitive, and changes as upstream CLIs release new dialogs and flags. Do not assume; verify once per environment:

1. Launch a throwaway session in a scratch directory.
2. Apply the two-signal rule.
3. Send a trivial task with a short timeout and confirm output returns.
4. Shut the session down.

Known reliability characteristics, as context for interpreting what you see:

Provider	Detection basis	What to watch for
kiro_cli	Version-specific prompt, credits, and separator patterns	New startup dialogs that default to a decline option; flag combinations the installed CLI rejects
hermes	Idle timer stable across repeated polls	Custom themes break prompt matching; slowest to confirm completion. Patterns are overridable by environment variable
opencode_cli	Alt-screen TUI completion marker	Scrollback is roughly one viewport; a long single response can lose its own top and fail extraction
claude_code, codex	Rendered-screen detection	Generally stable headless; still apply the two-signal rule

If a provider fails to launch headlessly, report the exact signature to the user and offer a different provider. Do not retry the same launch repeatedly — a flag rejection or a declining dialog will fail identically every time.

Interpreting a send that does not return

• A timeout is not a failure. The agent is still working; the caller stopped waiting. Say so, and check again later.
• Never re-send a task after a timeout. The original may still be running, and a duplicate risks conflicting work in the same directory.
• A busy terminal refuses input. Wait for idle or completed; do not force.
• An async send returns nothing by design. Poll afterwards, applying the two-signal rule.

Record what each session is for

CAO stores a session's name, not its purpose. An inventory of live sessions cannot tell you which is safe to touch.

Keep a short registry outside CAO — one line per session you launch: name, provider, working directory, purpose, date. Update it on launch and on shutdown, and read it before answering any question about what a session is doing or before acting on one.

Do not act on sessions you did not launch

Long-running sessions may hold real, unrecoverable work. Reads are always safe. Before sending to or shutting down a session you did not start yourself, ask the user first. Never issue a shutdown that targets all sessions at once.

Related

• cao-session-management — launching, messaging, and worker communication mechanics