| name | rwd-cohort-analysis |
| description | Real-world data cohort analysis pipeline for claims and EHR data — cohort identification with ICD-10, NDC, and CPT codes, medication adherence metrics (PDC/MPR), propensity score estimation and balance diagnostics, Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and Cox proportional hazards models. Use when the user mentions claims data, cohort identification, ICD-10 codes, NDC codes, CPT codes, medication adherence, PDC, MPR, propensity score, SMD balance, Kaplan-Meier, Cox model, Schoenfeld residuals, survival analysis on claims, or real-world evidence pipeline. |
| usage | Invoke when building cohort analysis pipelines from claims or EHR data with adherence metrics, propensity scores, and survival analysis. |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| validated_against | {"date":"2025-01-15T00:00:00.000Z","packages":{"lifelines":"0.28","statsmodels":"0.14","pandas":"2.2"}} |
| tags | ["skill","category:pipeline","real-world-data","claims","survival-analysis","propensity-score","cohort","hcls"] |
Real-World Data Cohort Analysis Pipeline
Overview
This skill encodes a reproducible pipeline for analyzing administrative claims
or EHR data to estimate comparative treatment effects. It covers the full
workflow from raw claims tables to adjusted survival estimates:
- Cohort identification using diagnosis (ICD-10-CM), procedure (CPT/HCPCS),
and drug (NDC) code lists
- Medication adherence measurement (PDC and MPR)
- Propensity score estimation and balance diagnostics
- Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression
Code snippets use Python (pandas, scikit-learn, lifelines) and R
(MatchIt, cobalt, survival, survminer). The user is responsible for data
access, IRB/privacy compliance, and clinical code-list validation.
Out of scope: data extraction from source systems, natural language processing
of clinical notes, interrupted time series, instrumental variable analyses.
Usage
Invoke when the user asks to:
- Build a cohort from claims or EHR data using diagnosis/procedure/drug codes
- Calculate PDC or MPR for medication adherence
- Estimate propensity scores and check covariate balance
- Run Kaplan-Meier or Cox regression on a claims-derived cohort
- Assess the proportional hazards assumption
The skill emits exact code. The user supplies the data and code lists.
Response Format
- Lead with the command or code the user needs — explain after
- Structure as: confirm inputs → working code → key parameters explained → gotchas
- One complete working example per task; do not show every alternative
- Keep code comments minimal and functional (what, not why-it-exists)
- Target: 50-100 lines of code with brief surrounding explanation
Core Concepts
Data model assumptions
The pipeline expects these tables (column names are illustrative):
| Table | Key columns |
|---|
enrollment | patient_id, enroll_start, enroll_end |
diagnoses | patient_id, dx_date, icd10_code, dx_position |
procedures | patient_id, proc_date, cpt_code |
pharmacy | patient_id, fill_date, ndc_code, days_supply, quantity |
demographics | patient_id, birth_date, sex, race |
1. Cohort Identification
Define code lists
T2D_ICD10 = ["E11.0", "E11.1", "E11.2", "E11.3", "E11.4",
"E11.5", "E11.6", "E11.8", "E11.9"]
DRUG_A_NDC = ["12345678901", "12345678902"]
DRUG_B_NDC = ["98765432101", "98765432102"]
OUTCOME_CPT = ["27590", "27591", "27592"]
Identify new users with washout
import pandas as pd
def identify_new_users(pharmacy, ndc_list, washout_days=180):
"""Identify incident users: first fill after washout with no prior fills."""
drug_fills = pharmacy[pharmacy["ndc_code"].isin(ndc_list)].copy()
drug_fills = drug_fills.sort_values(["patient_id", "fill_date"])
first_fill = drug_fills.groupby("patient_id")["fill_date"].min().reset_index()
first_fill.columns = ["patient_id", "index_date"]
cohort = first_fill.merge(enrollment, on="patient_id")
cohort["washout_start"] = cohort["index_date"] - pd.Timedelta(days=washout_days)
cohort = cohort[cohort["enroll_start"] <= cohort["washout_start"]]
cohort = cohort.merge(drug_fills, on="patient_id", suffixes=("", "_rx"))
prior_fills = cohort[
(cohort["fill_date"] >= cohort["washout_start"]) &
(cohort["fill_date"] < cohort["index_date"])
]
prevalent_users = prior_fills["patient_id"].unique()
cohort = first_fill[~first_fill["patient_id"].isin(prevalent_users)]
return cohort
Apply inclusion/exclusion criteria
def apply_criteria(cohort, diagnoses, enrollment, min_age=18,
required_dx_codes=None, excluded_dx_codes=None,
pre_index_window=365, min_followup=30):
"""Filter cohort by age, required/excluded diagnoses, enrollment."""
cohort = cohort.merge(demographics, on="patient_id")
cohort["age"] = (cohort["index_date"] - cohort["birth_date"]).dt.days / 365.25
cohort = cohort[cohort["age"] >= min_age]
if required_dx_codes:
pre_dx = diagnoses[diagnoses["icd10_code"].isin(required_dx_codes)]
pre_dx = pre_dx.merge(cohort[["patient_id", "index_date"]], on="patient_id")
pre_dx = pre_dx[
(pre_dx["dx_date"] >= pre_dx["index_date"] - pd.Timedelta(days=pre_index_window)) &
(pre_dx["dx_date"] < pre_dx["index_date"])
]
cohort = cohort[cohort["patient_id"].isin(pre_dx["patient_id"].unique())]
if excluded_dx_codes:
excl = diagnoses[diagnoses["icd10_code"].isin(excluded_dx_codes)]
excl = excl.merge(cohort[["patient_id", "index_date"]], on="patient_id")
excl = excl[excl["dx_date"] < excl["index_date"]]
cohort = cohort[~cohort["patient_id"].isin(excl["patient_id"].unique())]
cohort = cohort.merge(enrollment, on="patient_id")
cohort["followup_end"] = cohort[["enroll_end", cohort.columns[-1]]].min(axis=1)
cohort = cohort[
(cohort["enroll_end"] - cohort["index_date"]).dt.days >= min_followup
]
return cohort
2. Medication Adherence
PDC (Proportion of Days Covered)
PDC is the preferred measure (endorsed by PQA). It counts the number of days
in the measurement period covered by at least one fill, capped at 1.0.
def calculate_pdc(pharmacy, cohort, ndc_list, period_days=365):
"""Calculate PDC for each patient over a fixed measurement period."""
fills = pharmacy[pharmacy["ndc_code"].isin(ndc_list)].copy()
fills = fills.merge(cohort[["patient_id", "index_date"]], on="patient_id")
fills["period_end"] = fills["index_date"] + pd.Timedelta(days=period_days)
fills = fills[fills["fill_date"] < fills["period_end"]]
fills["cover_start"] = fills["fill_date"]
fills["cover_end"] = fills["fill_date"] + pd.to_timedelta(fills["days_supply"], unit="D")
fills["cover_end"] = fills[["cover_end", "period_end"]].min(axis=1)
fills["cover_start"] = fills[["cover_start", "index_date"]].max(axis=1)
results = []
for pid, grp in fills.groupby("patient_id"):
days_covered = set()
for _, row in grp.iterrows():
days_covered.update(pd.date_range(row["cover_start"], row["cover_end"] - pd.Timedelta(days=1)))
results.append({"patient_id": pid, "pdc": min(len(days_covered) / period_days, 1.0)})
return pd.DataFrame(results)
MPR (Medication Possession Ratio)
def calculate_mpr(pharmacy, cohort, ndc_list, period_days=365):
"""MPR = total days supply dispensed / days in period. Can exceed 1.0."""
fills = pharmacy[pharmacy["ndc_code"].isin(ndc_list)].copy()
fills = fills.merge(cohort[["patient_id", "index_date"]], on="patient_id")
fills["period_end"] = fills["index_date"] + pd.Timedelta(days=period_days)
fills = fills[(fills["fill_date"] >= fills["index_date"]) &
(fills["fill_date"] < fills["period_end"])]
mpr = fills.groupby("patient_id")["days_supply"].sum().reset_index()
mpr.columns = ["patient_id", "total_supply"]
mpr["mpr"] = mpr["total_supply"] / period_days
return mpr
| Metric | Formula | Range | Notes |
|---|
| PDC | Days covered / days in period | 0–1.0 | Preferred; no double-counting overlapping fills |
| MPR | Total days supply / days in period | 0–∞ | Can exceed 1.0 with early refills; less preferred |
Adherence threshold: PDC ≥ 0.80 is the standard cutoff for "adherent."
3. Propensity Score Estimation
Python (scikit-learn)
from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression
import numpy as np
def estimate_ps(cohort, covariate_cols, treatment_col="treatment"):
"""Fit logistic regression PS model. Returns cohort with ps column."""
X = cohort[covariate_cols].fillna(0)
y = cohort[treatment_col]
model = LogisticRegression(max_iter=1000, solver="lbfgs", C=1e6)
model.fit(X, y)
cohort = cohort.copy()
cohort["ps"] = model.predict_proba(X)[:, 1]
return cohort, model
R (MatchIt + cobalt)
library(MatchIt)
library(cobalt)
m <- matchit(treatment ~ age + sex + charlson + prior_hosp + prior_rx_count,
data = cohort, method = "nearest", distance = "glm",
caliper = 0.2, ratio = 1)
matched_data <- match.data(m)
bal.tab(m, thresholds = c(m = 0.1))
love.plot(m, threshold = 0.1)
4. Balance Diagnostics
SMD calculation (Python)
def compute_smd(cohort, covariate_cols, treatment_col="treatment"):
"""Compute standardized mean differences for all covariates."""
treated = cohort[cohort[treatment_col] == 1]
comparator = cohort[cohort[treatment_col] == 0]
results = []
for col in covariate_cols:
mean_t = treated[col].mean()
mean_c = comparator[col].mean()
var_t = treated[col].var()
var_c = comparator[col].var()
pooled_sd = np.sqrt((var_t + var_c) / 2)
smd = abs(mean_t - mean_c) / pooled_sd if pooled_sd > 0 else 0
results.append({"covariate": col, "smd": round(smd, 4),
"balanced": smd < 0.1})
return pd.DataFrame(results)
| Diagnostic | Target | Action if failed |
|---|
| SMD | < 0.1 for all covariates | Add interactions/non-linear terms to PS model |
| Variance ratio | 0.5–2.0 | Re-specify PS model or trim extremes |
| PS overlap | Substantial overlap in both groups | Trim non-overlapping regions; report trimmed N |
| Weight distribution (IPTW) | Mean ≈ 1.0; max < 10 | Truncate at 1st/99th percentile |
5. IPTW (Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting)
def compute_iptw(cohort, treatment_col="treatment", ps_col="ps",
stabilized=True, truncate_pct=(1, 99)):
"""Compute stabilized IPTW weights with truncation."""
cohort = cohort.copy()
t = cohort[treatment_col]
ps = cohort[ps_col]
if stabilized:
p_treat = t.mean()
cohort["iptw"] = np.where(t == 1, p_treat / ps, (1 - p_treat) / (1 - ps))
else:
cohort["iptw"] = np.where(t == 1, 1 / ps, 1 / (1 - ps))
lo, hi = np.percentile(cohort["iptw"], truncate_pct)
cohort["iptw"] = cohort["iptw"].clip(lo, hi)
return cohort
6. Kaplan-Meier Survival Analysis
Python (lifelines)
from lifelines import KaplanMeierFitter
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
def plot_km(cohort, duration_col="followup_days", event_col="event",
group_col="treatment", labels=("Drug B", "Drug A")):
"""Plot Kaplan-Meier curves by treatment group."""
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(8, 6))
kmf = KaplanMeierFitter()
for grp, label in zip([0, 1], labels):
mask = cohort[group_col] == grp
kmf.fit(cohort.loc[mask, duration_col], cohort.loc[mask, event_col],
label=label)
kmf.plot_survival_function(ax=ax, ci_show=True)
ax.set_xlabel("Days from index date")
ax.set_ylabel("Survival probability")
ax.set_title("Kaplan-Meier Survival Curves")
plt.tight_layout()
return fig
R (survival + survminer)
library(survival)
library(survminer)
fit <- survfit(Surv(followup_days, event) ~ treatment, data = cohort)
ggsurvplot(fit, data = cohort, pval = TRUE, risk.table = TRUE,
xlab = "Days from index date", ylab = "Survival probability",
legend.labs = c("Drug B", "Drug A"))
7. Cox Proportional Hazards Model
Python (lifelines)
from lifelines import CoxPHFitter
def fit_cox(cohort, duration_col="followup_days", event_col="event",
covariates=None, weight_col=None):
"""Fit Cox PH model, optionally weighted (IPTW)."""
cols = [duration_col, event_col] + (covariates or [])
if weight_col:
cols.append(weight_col)
df = cohort[cols].dropna()
cph = CoxPHFitter()
cph.fit(df, duration_col=duration_col, event_col=event_col,
weights_col=weight_col, robust=True if weight_col else False)
cph.print_summary()
return cph
R (survival)
cox_fit <- coxph(Surv(followup_days, event) ~ treatment + age + sex + charlson,
data = matched_data)
summary(cox_fit)
cox_iptw <- coxph(Surv(followup_days, event) ~ treatment,
data = cohort, weights = iptw, robust = TRUE)
summary(cox_iptw)
8. Proportional Hazards Assumption Check
Schoenfeld residuals (Python)
def check_ph_assumption(cph):
"""Test and plot Schoenfeld residuals for PH assumption."""
cph.check_assumptions(cohort, p_value_threshold=0.05, show_plots=True)
R
ph_test <- cox.zph(cox_fit)
print(ph_test)
plot(ph_test)
| PH test result | Action |
|---|
| All p > 0.05 | PH assumption holds; proceed |
| Covariate p < 0.05 | Stratify on that covariate or add time-interaction term |
| Global p < 0.05 | Consider restricted mean survival time (RMST) or parametric AFT model |
Pipeline summary
1. Define code lists (ICD-10, NDC, CPT)
2. Identify new users with washout → cohort table
3. Apply inclusion/exclusion criteria → filtered cohort
4. Build baseline covariate matrix → pre-index features
5. Estimate propensity scores → ps column
6. Match or weight (IPTW) → balanced cohort
7. Check balance (SMD < 0.1) → Love plot / SMD table
8. Calculate adherence (PDC/MPR) → adherence metrics
9. Define outcome + follow-up → duration + event columns
10. Kaplan-Meier curves → survival plot
11. Cox PH model (adjusted or weighted) → hazard ratios + CIs
12. Check PH assumption (Schoenfeld) → assumption diagnostics
Common Mistakes
-
Wrong: Using MPR instead of PDC for medication adherence
Right: Use PDC (Proportion of Days Covered) as the adherence metric
Why: MPR double-counts overlapping fills, can exceed 1.0, and is not endorsed by PQA
-
Wrong: Not requiring continuous enrollment during the study period
Right: Verify continuous enrollment for both washout and follow-up windows
Why: Gaps in enrollment create unobservable periods where events and fills are missed
-
Wrong: Omitting a washout period before the index date
Right: Require a clean washout (typically 180 days) with no prior fills of the study drug
Why: Without washout, prevalent users contaminate the new-user cohort and bias results
-
Wrong: Including post-index covariates in the propensity score model
Right: Only use pre-index (baseline) variables in the PS model
Why: Post-index variables may be affected by treatment, introducing collider bias
-
Wrong: Using p-values to assess covariate balance after matching/weighting
Right: Use standardized mean differences (SMD < 0.1) for all covariates
Why: P-values conflate balance with sample size and are uninformative for this purpose
-
Wrong: Not checking propensity score overlap between treatment groups
Right: Plot PS distributions for both groups and trim non-overlapping regions
Why: Estimates in non-overlapping regions are extrapolated and unreliable
-
Wrong: Reporting Cox model results without testing the proportional hazards assumption
Right: Always run Schoenfeld residual tests and inspect plots for time trends
Why: Violated PH produces misleading hazard ratios; consider RMST or stratification instead
-
Wrong: Using naive standard errors with IPTW-weighted analyses
Right: Use robust (sandwich) variance estimators when fitting weighted models
Why: Naive SEs underestimate uncertainty because they ignore the weight estimation step
-
Wrong: Truncating IPTW weights too aggressively (e.g., at 5th/95th percentile)
Right: Truncate conservatively (1st/99th) and report sensitivity across thresholds
Why: Over-truncation reintroduces confounding by effectively unweighting key observations
-
Wrong: Defining follow-up end as a fixed calendar date for all patients
Right: End follow-up at the earliest of: event, disenrollment, end of study, or death
Why: Incorrect censoring biases survival estimates and violates non-informative censoring assumptions
References