| name | variant-calling |
| description | Germline and somatic short-variant calling pipeline for Illumina short-read data. Use when the user mentions BWA, BWA-MEM2, GATK, HaplotypeCaller, Mutect2, VCF, GVCF, VQSR, variant calling, germline, somatic, SNV, or indel calling from FASTQ/BAM. |
| usage | Invoke when running germline or somatic variant calling with BWA-MEM2, GATK4 HaplotypeCaller, Mutect2, or VQSR. |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| validated_against | {"date":"2025-01-15T00:00:00.000Z","packages":{"gatk":"4.5","bwa-mem2":"2.2.1","samtools":"1.19"}} |
| tags | ["skill","category:pipeline","genomics","variant-calling","gatk","bwa","hcls"] |
Variant Calling (GATK4) — Pipeline Skill (Thin Scaffold)
Overview
Adds decision logic for VQSR vs hard filters, WES vs WGS parameter differences, and GATK4-specific gotchas that LLMs frequently get wrong (filter thresholds, GVCF requirements, reference consistency).
Usage
- Activate when choosing between VQSR and hard filters for a given cohort size
- Activate when setting up WES vs WGS pipeline parameters
- Activate when running Mutect2 tumor/normal or tumor-only somatic calling
Core Concepts
Decision Logic
Germline calling strategy:
├── Single sample, no future joint calling → HaplotypeCaller direct VCF
└── Cohort (≥2 samples) → HaplotypeCaller -ERC GVCF → GenomicsDBImport → GenotypeGVCFs
Filtering strategy:
├── ≥30 WGS samples OR ≥30 WES exomes → VQSR
└── <30 samples OR single sample → Hard filters
Somatic calling:
├── Tumor + matched normal → Mutect2 with both BAMs
└── Tumor-only → Mutect2 + PoN (MANDATORY) + gnomAD germline resource
WES vs WGS parameter differences:
| Step | WGS | WES |
|---|
| BQSR / HaplotypeCaller | No -L | -L capture.bed -ip 100 |
| Known sites for BQSR | Genome-wide | Genome-wide (do NOT subset) |
| Filtering | VQSR (≥30 samples) | Hard filters unless ≥30 exomes |
| Joint genotyping intervals | Per-chromosome | -L capture.bed |
Critical Parameters
Hard filter thresholds (GATK Best Practices):
| Filter | SNP threshold | Indel threshold |
|---|
| QD | < 2.0 | < 2.0 |
| FS | > 60.0 | > 200.0 |
| MQ | < 40.0 | — |
| MQRankSum | < -12.5 | — |
| ReadPosRankSum | < -8.0 | < -20.0 |
| SOR | > 3.0 | > 10.0 |
VQSR truth sensitivity levels:
- SNPs: 99.7
- Indels: 99.0
- Indel
--max-gaussians 4 (fewer training variants than SNPs)
VQSR annotations: -an QD -an FS -an MQ -an MQRankSum -an ReadPosRankSum -an SOR
Mutect2 essentials:
--germline-resource af-only-gnomad.hg38.vcf.gz
--panel-of-normals pon.vcf.gz (essential for tumor-only)
--f1r2-tar-gz → LearnReadOrientationModel (FFPE/OxoG artifacts)
GetPileupSummaries + CalculateContamination before FilterMutectCalls
Common Mistakes
-
Wrong: Aligning without proper @RG headers (missing ID, SM, PL, LB)
Right: Always specify at alignment: -R '@RG\tID:x\tSM:x\tPL:ILLUMINA\tLB:x'
Why: GATK refuses to run or silently merges samples when SM tags are wrong
-
Wrong: Running HaplotypeCaller without -ERC GVCF for cohort analysis
Right: Always produce GVCFs when joint genotyping will be performed
Why: Regular VCFs cannot be joint-genotyped; must re-call from BAM
-
Wrong: Reusing SNP hard-filter thresholds for indels (e.g., FS > 60 for indels)
Right: Use FS > 200 for indels, FS > 60 for SNPs
Why: Indels tolerate higher strand bias; SNP thresholds over-filter real indels
-
Wrong: Applying VQSR to <30 samples
Right: Use hard filters for small cohorts
Why: VQSR needs many variants to train its Gaussian mixture model
-
Wrong: Subsetting --known-sites VCFs to WES capture BED for BQSR
Right: Use genome-wide known-sites; only restrict analysis intervals via -L
Why: BQSR needs genome-wide known sites to model base quality errors
-
Wrong: Skipping samtools index between GATK steps
Right: Index after every BAM-producing step
Why: GATK requires BAM indices; missing them causes immediate failure
-
Wrong: Mixing reference files from different genome builds
Right: Ensure ref.dict, ref.fa.fai, BWA index, and all VCFs match the same build
Why: Mismatched dictionaries cause silent failures or cryptic errors
-
Wrong: Running Mutect2 tumor-only without a panel of normals
Right: Always provide --panel-of-normals for tumor-only calling
Why: Without PoN, recurrent sequencing artifacts are called as somatic mutations
Response Format
- Lead with the command or code the user needs — explain after
- Structure as: confirm inputs → working code → key parameters explained → gotchas
- One complete working example per task; do not show every alternative
- Keep code comments minimal and functional (what, not why-it-exists)
- Target: 50-100 lines of code with brief surrounding explanation