| name | do-code-review |
| description | Reviews code changes in azure-ai-ml package for quality, Azure SDK compliance, and best practices. Use when reviewing code, checking pull requests, or when user asks to review changes or check code quality in azure-ai-ml. |
Azure AI ML Code Review
Reviews uncommitted changes (staged and unstaged files) in the azure-ai-ml package, focusing on Azure SDK Python design guidelines, type safety, testing patterns, and API consistency.
Default Review Scope
Unless otherwise specified, review all uncommitted changes in the current branch (staged and unstaged files) within sdk/ml/azure-ai-ml/. This includes new files, modified files, and any pending changes that haven't been committed yet.
Review Focus Areas
1. Azure SDK Design Guidelines Compliance
- Check: Adherence to Azure SDK Python Design Guidelines
- Look for: Proper client naming, method patterns, parameter order
- Flag: Non-compliant naming (use
create_or_update not create_or_replace)
- Example Issue:
def get_job(name, subscription_id) should be def get_job(name, **kwargs)
Key Patterns:
- Client methods:
begin_* for LROs, list_* for paginators
- Naming: snake_case for methods, PascalCase for classes
- Parameters: Required positional, optional keyword-only
- Return types: Explicit type hints for all public APIs
2. Type Annotations & MyPy Compliance
- Check: Complete type annotations on all public APIs
- Look for: Proper use of
Optional, Union, TYPE_CHECKING
- Flag: Missing return types,
Any without justification, bare dict/list
- Example Issue:
def process_data(data) should be def process_data(data: Dict[str, Any]) -> ProcessedData
Common Fixes:
def get_config(name):
return config
def get_config(name: str) -> Optional[Dict[str, Any]]:
return config
3. Pylint Compliance
- Check: Code passes pylint with azure-sdk-for-python rules
- Look for: Proper docstrings, no unused imports, correct argument names
- Flag: Violations of naming conventions, too many arguments (>5), long lines (>120)
- Reference: Azure Pylint Guidelines
Watch for:
client-method-should-not-use-static-method
missing-client-constructor-parameter-credential
client-method-has-more-than-5-positional-arguments
4. Async/Await Patterns
- Check: Proper async implementation in
_async modules
- Look for: Using
async with for clients, awaiting coroutines correctly
- Flag: Blocking calls in async code, missing
await, sync code in async modules
- Example Issue:
self._client.get() in async should be await self._client.get()
Pattern:
async def create_or_update(
self,
entity: Job,
**kwargs: Any
) -> Job:
async with self._lock:
result = await self._service_client.create_or_update(...)
return result
5. Error Handling & Validation
- Check: Proper exception handling with Azure SDK exceptions
- Look for: Use of
HttpResponseError, ResourceNotFoundError, proper validation
- Flag: Bare
except:, catching Exception without re-raising, missing validation
- Example Issue: Missing parameter validation before API calls
Pattern:
from azure.core.exceptions import ResourceNotFoundError, HttpResponseError
try:
result = self._operation.get(name)
except ResourceNotFoundError:
raise ResourceNotFoundError(f"Job '{name}' not found")
except HttpResponseError as e:
raise HttpResponseError(f"Failed to retrieve job: {e.message}")
6. API Design & Operations
- Check: Consistent CRUD patterns across operations classes
- Look for: Proper separation of sync/async, operations returning correct types
- Flag: Business logic in client, missing operations class, inconsistent method names
Structure:
azure/ai/ml/
├── operations/ # Sync operations
│ ├── job_operations.py
│ └── model_operations.py
└── aio/operations/ # Async operations (mirror structure)
├── job_operations.py
└── model_operations.py
7. Entity & Schema Patterns
- Check: Proper use of marshmallow schemas, correct entity inheritance
- Look for: Schema validation, proper serialization/deserialization
- Flag: Direct dict manipulation instead of entities, missing schema validation
Entity Pattern:
@dataclass
class Job(Resource):
"""Job entity."""
name: str
experiment_name: Optional[str] = None
def _to_rest_object(self) -> RestJob:
"""Convert to REST representation."""
...
@classmethod
def _from_rest_object(cls, obj: RestJob) -> "Job":
"""Create from REST representation."""
...
8. Testing Patterns
- Check: Proper unit tests, recorded tests for operations
- Look for: Use of
pytest, proper test isolation, fixture usage
- Flag: Missing tests for new features, tests with external dependencies, hardcoded values
Test Structure:
class TestJobOperations:
"""Test job operations."""
def test_create_job(self, client: MLClient, mock_workspace: Mock) -> None:
"""Test job creation."""
job = Job(name="test-job")
result = client.jobs.create_or_update(job)
assert result.name == "test-job"
@pytest.mark.recorded
def test_get_job_recorded(self, client: MLClient) -> None:
"""Test getting job with recording."""
...
9. Documentation & Docstrings
- Check: Complete docstrings following Google/NumPy style
- Look for: Parameter descriptions, return types, examples, raises
- Flag: Missing docstrings on public APIs, incomplete parameter docs
Docstring Pattern:
def create_or_update(
self,
job: Job,
**kwargs: Any
) -> Job:
"""Create or update a job.
:param job: The job entity to create or update.
:type job: ~azure.ai.ml.entities.Job
:keyword bool skip_validation: Skip validation of the job.
:return: The created or updated job.
:rtype: ~azure.ai.ml.entities.Job
:raises ~azure.core.exceptions.HttpResponseError: If the request fails.
.. admonition:: Example:
.. code-block:: python
from azure.ai.ml.entities import Job
job = Job(name="my-job")
result = ml_client.jobs.create_or_update(job)
"""
10. Backwards Compatibility
- Check: No breaking changes without major version bump
- Look for: Deprecated parameters, migration paths, version notes
- Flag: Removing public methods, changing signatures, removing parameters
Deprecation Pattern:
import warnings
def old_method(self, param: str) -> None:
"""Deprecated method.
.. deprecated:: 1.2.0
Use :meth:`new_method` instead.
"""
warnings.warn(
"old_method is deprecated, use new_method instead",
DeprecationWarning,
stacklevel=2
)
self.new_method(param)
11. Security & Credentials
- Check: Proper credential handling, no secrets in logs
- Look for: Use of
TokenCredential, proper token refresh, sanitized logging
- Flag: Credentials in error messages, API keys in code, secrets in tests
Pattern:
from azure.core.credentials import TokenCredential
class MLClient:
def __init__(
self,
credential: TokenCredential,
subscription_id: str,
**kwargs: Any
):
self._credential = credential
12. Performance & Efficiency
- Check: Efficient API calls, proper pagination, lazy loading
- Look for: Batching operations, caching where appropriate, avoiding N+1 queries
- Flag: Loading all items in memory, multiple API calls in loops, no pagination
Pagination Pattern:
def list(self, **kwargs: Any) -> Iterable[Job]:
"""List jobs with pagination.
:return: An iterable of jobs.
:rtype: ~azure.core.paging.ItemPaged[~azure.ai.ml.entities.Job]
"""
return self._operation.list(...)
Analysis Instructions
- Get uncommitted changes: Use git to identify modified files in
sdk/ml/azure-ai-ml/
- Read changed sections: Focus on modified lines and surrounding context
- Check each focus area: Go through all 12 areas systematically
- Priority levels: Critical (breaking/security) > High (bugs/types) > Medium (style/docs)
- Provide specific examples: Show actual code with file paths and line numbers
- Cross-reference: Check consistency across sync/async, operations/entities
Output Format
Organize findings by priority and category:
✅ Positive Observations
Good patterns worth highlighting
🔴 Critical Issues
- Breaking changes without migration path
- Missing credential validation
- Type safety violations causing runtime errors
- Security vulnerabilities
⚠️ High Priority Issues
- Missing type annotations on public APIs
- Pylint/MyPy errors
- Missing tests for new functionality
- Improper async patterns
📋 Medium Priority Issues
- Missing or incomplete docstrings
- Code style inconsistencies
- Performance optimizations
- Better error messages
💡 Suggestions
- Refactoring opportunities
- Additional test coverage
- Documentation improvements
For each issue:
- Location: File path and line numbers
- Current code: Show the problematic code
- Issue: Explain what's wrong and why
- Recommended fix: Show corrected code
- References: Link to relevant guidelines
Summary
- Total files changed: X
- Critical issues: X
- High priority: X
- Medium priority: X
- Overall assessment: Ready/Needs work/Blocked
Focus on issues that impact SDK quality, user experience, backwards compatibility, and Azure SDK guideline compliance.