| name | feature-spec |
| description | Define feature requirements (problem, users, scope, acceptance criteria) through guided Q&A and write FEATURE_SPEC.md. Use when starting a new feature. |
| argument-hint | <feature-name> |
| allowed-tools | Bash, Read, Write, AskUserQuestion |
Generate a feature specification document for the feature $1.
Workflow
Copy this checklist and track progress:
Feature Spec Progress:
- [ ] Directory guard
- [ ] Handle arguments (feature name)
- [ ] Plan status guard
- [ ] Create feature directory
- [ ] Existing file guard (prevent overwrite)
- [ ] Run guided Q&A process (from PROMPT.md)
- [ ] Write FEATURE_SPEC.md
- [ ] Update plans/PLAN_STATUS.md
- [ ] Capture deferred requirements
- [ ] Cross-model review (if Codex available)
Directory Guard
-
If .toolkit-marker exists in the current working directory → STOP:
"You're in the toolkit repo. Feature skills run from your project directory.
Run: cd ~/Projects/your-project && /feature-spec $1"
-
Check .claude/toolkit-version.json exists in the current working directory (confirms /setup was run).
If missing → STOP: "Toolkit not installed. Run /setup from the toolkit first."
-
Check AGENTS.md exists in the current working directory (confirms project root).
If missing → STOP: "Run this from your project root (where AGENTS.md lives)."
Arguments
$1 = feature name (e.g., analytics, dark-mode)
- If
$1 is empty, ask the user for the feature name
PROJECT_ROOT = current working directory
FEATURE_DIR = PROJECT_ROOT/features/$1
Plan Status Guard
Read ~/.claude/skills/shared/PLAN_STATUS.md before writing files.
- Ensure
PROJECT_ROOT/plans/ exists.
- Read
PROJECT_ROOT/plans/PLAN_STATUS.md if it exists.
- If another path is listed as
Current plan with Current status: active,
ask whether this feature supersedes it, should be recorded as non-current
planned work, or should abort.
- If this feature supersedes the current plan, record the previous plan as
superseded in the history table.
- If
plans/PLAN_STATUS.md is missing, create it after writing the feature spec.
Create features/$1/ if it doesn't exist:
mkdir -p "features/$1"
Existing File Guard (Prevent Overwrite)
Before asking any questions, check whether FEATURE_DIR/FEATURE_SPEC.md already exists.
- If it does not exist: continue normally.
- If it exists: STOP and ask the user what to do:
- Archive then overwrite (recommended): copy the existing feature plan set to
features/archive/YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS-$1/, mark the archived snapshot as superseded when practical, then write the new document to FEATURE_DIR/FEATURE_SPEC.md
- Overwrite: replace
FEATURE_DIR/FEATURE_SPEC.md with the new document
- Abort: do not write anything; suggest they rename/move the existing file first
Process
Read .claude/skills/feature-spec/PROMPT.md and follow its instructions exactly:
- Ask the user to describe the feature they want to add
- Work through each question category (Problem, Users, Behavior, Integration, Scope)
- Make recommendations with confidence levels
- Generate the final FEATURE_SPEC.md document
Output
Write the completed specification to FEATURE_DIR/FEATURE_SPEC.md.
Update PROJECT_ROOT/plans/PLAN_STATUS.md so:
Current plan is features/$1/ unless the user explicitly chose non-current planned work
Current type is feature
Current stage is feature-spec
Current status is active for current work, or planned for non-current work
- the history table records any archived or superseded plan snapshot
Deferred Requirements Capture (During Q&A)
IMPORTANT: Capture deferred requirements interactively during the Q&A process, not after.
Write deferred items to PROJECT_ROOT/DEFERRED.md (not the feature directory).
When to Trigger
During the Q&A, watch for signals that the user is deferring something:
- "out of scope"
- "not in this feature" / "separate feature"
- "v2" / "future version"
- "later" / "eventually"
- "follow-up" / "future enhancement"
- "nice to have"
- "we'll skip that for now"
Capture Flow
When you detect a deferral signal, immediately use AskUserQuestion:
Question: "Would you like to save this to your deferred requirements?"
Header: "Defer?"
Options:
- "Yes, capture it" — I'll ask a few quick questions to document it
- "No, skip" — Don't record this
If user selects "Yes, capture it":
Ask these clarifying questions:
-
What's being deferred?
"In one sentence, what's the requirement or feature?"
(Pre-fill with your understanding from context)
-
Why defer it?
Options: "Out of scope for this feature" / "Separate feature" / "V2" / "Needs more research" / "Other"
-
Notes for later?
"Any context that will help when revisiting this?"
(Optional — user can skip)
Write to DEFERRED.md Immediately
After collecting answers, append to PROJECT_ROOT/DEFERRED.md right away.
If file doesn't exist, create it:
# Deferred Requirements
> Captured during specification Q&A. Review when planning future versions.
## From FEATURE_SPEC.md: {FEATURE_NAME} ({date})
| Requirement | Reason | Notes |
|-------------|--------|-------|
| {user's answer} | {selected reason} | {notes or "—"} |
If file exists, add new feature section or append to existing:
## From FEATURE_SPEC.md: {FEATURE_NAME} ({date})
| Requirement | Reason | Notes |
|-------------|--------|-------|
| {user's answer} | {selected reason} | {notes or "—"} |
Continue Q&A
After capturing (or skipping), continue the spec Q&A where you left off.
Lean Mode (--lean)
When --lean is passed:
- Skip all post-generation gates. Do not run
/verify-spec, /codex-consult, or /criteria-audit. Report each as LEAN_SKIP in the output.
- All other steps (Q&A, document generation, deferred capture) run normally.
Post-Generation Gates (MANDATORY unless --lean)
These gates MUST execute before you produce the "Next Step" output. The output template requires results from each gate. Reporting SKIPPED without --lean is a skill violation — go back and run the gate.
Gate 1: Spec Verification
After writing FEATURE_SPEC.md, run quality verification:
- Invoke
/verify-spec feature-spec on the generated document
- This runs quality checks only (no upstream context preservation since FEATURE_SPEC.md has no upstream):
- Q-001: Vague/unmeasurable language ("fast", "user-friendly", "simple")
- Q-002: Subjective terms without targets ("better", "improved")
- Q-003: Missing rationale for decisions
- Q-005: Implicit assumptions
- Q-006: Conflicting requirements
- Q-PS-001: Missing user flow (feature mentioned without step-by-step interaction)
- Q-PS-002: Only happy path described (no edge cases)
- Q-PS-003: Unbounded scope ("all", "any", "every" without limits)
- Q-PS-004: Missing non-functional requirements (performance, security, accessibility)
- Present CRITICAL issues with resolution options (max 2 fix iterations)
- Do not proceed to Gate 2 until verification passes or user explicitly chooses to proceed with noted issues
Gate 2: Cross-Model Review
After verification, run cross-model review if Codex CLI is available:
- Check if Codex CLI is installed:
codex --version
- If available, run
/codex-consult on the generated document
- Present any findings to the user before proceeding
Consultation invocation:
/codex-consult --research "feature requirements, user stories" features/$1/FEATURE_SPEC.md
If Codex finds issues:
- Show critical issues and recommendations
- Ask user: "Address findings before proceeding?" (Yes/No)
- If Yes: Apply suggested fixes
- If No: Continue with noted issues
If Codex CLI is not installed or not authenticated: Report UNAVAILABLE (not SKIPPED — the distinction matters).
Error Handling
| Situation | Action |
|---|
| Feature name argument is empty and user does not provide one | Prompt again with AskUserQuestion; do not proceed without a feature name |
| FEATURE_SPEC.md already exists and user selects "Abort" | Stop immediately, do not write any files, suggest renaming or moving the existing file |
PROMPT.md not found at .claude/skills/feature-spec/PROMPT.md | Stop and report "Skill asset missing — reinstall toolkit or run /setup" |
| DEFERRED.md write fails (permissions or disk) | Output deferred items to terminal, warn user, continue with spec generation |
| Codex CLI invocation fails or times out | Log the error, skip cross-model review, proceed to Next Step |
Next Step
Pre-condition: All gates above have completed, or --lean was explicitly passed. If you have not run them, STOP and run them now. Reporting SKIPPED without --lean is a skill violation.
When complete, inform the user:
FEATURE_SPEC.md created at features/$1/FEATURE_SPEC.md
Deferred Requirements: {count} items captured to DEFERRED.md
Verification: PASSED | PASSED WITH NOTES | NEEDS REVIEW | LEAN_SKIP
Cross-Model Review: PASSED | PASSED WITH NOTES | UNAVAILABLE | LEAN_SKIP
Next: Run /feature-technical-spec $1