| name | bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline |
| description | End-to-end biomarker discovery workflow from expression data to validated biomarker panels. Covers feature selection with Boruta/LASSO, classifier training with nested CV, and SHAP interpretation. Use when building and validating diagnostic or prognostic biomarker signatures from omics data. |
| tool_type | python |
| primary_tool | sklearn |
| workflow | true |
| depends_on | ["machine-learning/biomarker-discovery","machine-learning/model-validation","machine-learning/omics-classifiers","machine-learning/prediction-explanation"] |
| qc_checkpoints | [{"after_selection":"Selected features >5 and <200, stability >0.6"},{"after_cv":"Nested CV AUC >0.7, fold variance <0.1"},{"after_interpretation":"Top 20 SHAP features: >50% overlap with selected features"}] |
Version Compatibility
Reference examples tested with: matplotlib 3.8+, numpy 1.26+, pandas 2.2+, scanpy 1.10+, scikit-learn 1.4+
Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:
- Python:
pip show <package> then help(module.function) to check signatures
If code throws ImportError, AttributeError, or TypeError, introspect the installed
package and adapt the example to match the actual API rather than retrying.
Biomarker Discovery Pipeline
"Build a validated biomarker panel from my omics data" → Orchestrate feature selection (Boruta/LASSO), nested cross-validation classifier training, and SHAP interpretation to produce a robust, validated biomarker signature.
Complete pipeline from expression data to validated biomarker panels with classifier.
Workflow Overview
Expression matrix + Metadata
|
v
[1. Data Preparation] -----> StandardScaler, train/test split
|
v
[2. Feature Selection] ----> Boruta or LASSO stability selection
|
v
[3. Model Training] -------> RandomForest/XGBoost with nested CV
|
v
[4. Model Interpretation] -> SHAP values, feature importance
|
v
[5. Validation] -----------> Hold-out test, bootstrap CI
|
v
Validated biomarker panel + classifier
Step 1: Data Preparation
import pandas as pd
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler
expr = pd.read_csv('expression.csv', index_col=0)
meta = pd.read_csv('metadata.csv', index_col=0)
X = expr.T
y = meta.loc[X.index, 'condition'].values
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(
X, y, test_size=0.2, stratify=y, random_state=42
)
scaler = StandardScaler()
X_train_scaled = scaler.fit_transform(X_train)
X_test_scaled = scaler.transform(X_test)
QC Checkpoint 1: Check class balance, sample counts per group
- Minimum 10 samples per class recommended
- Classes should be reasonably balanced (ratio <3:1)
Step 2: Feature Selection
Option A: Boruta (All-Relevant Selection)
from boruta import BorutaPy
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier
from sklearn.feature_selection import SelectKBest, f_classif
if X_train_scaled.shape[1] > 10000:
selector = SelectKBest(f_classif, k=5000)
selector.fit(X_train_scaled, y_train)
X_train_filt = X_train_scaled[:, selector.get_support()]
feature_mask = selector.get_support()
else:
X_train_filt = X_train_scaled
feature_mask = None
rf = RandomForestClassifier(n_estimators=100, max_depth=5, n_jobs=-1, random_state=42)
boruta = BorutaPy(rf, n_estimators='auto', max_iter=100, random_state=42, verbose=0)
boruta.fit(X_train_filt, y_train)
selected_idx = boruta.support_
print(f'Selected {selected_idx.sum()} features')
Option B: LASSO Stability Selection
from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegressionCV
import numpy as np
n_bootstrap = 100
stability_scores = np.zeros(X_train_scaled.shape[1])
for i in range(n_bootstrap):
idx = np.random.choice(len(y_train), size=len(y_train), replace=True)
model = LogisticRegressionCV(penalty='l1', solver='saga', Cs=10, cv=3, random_state=i, max_iter=1000)
model.fit(X_train_scaled[idx], y_train[idx])
stability_scores += (model.coef_[0] != 0).astype(int)
stability_scores /= n_bootstrap
selected_idx = stability_scores > 0.6
print(f'Selected {selected_idx.sum()} features (stability >0.6)')
QC Checkpoint 2:
- Selected features: 5-200 range
- Too few (<5): lower threshold, increase iterations
- Too many (>200): increase threshold, add pre-filtering
Step 3: Model Training with Nested CV
from sklearn.model_selection import StratifiedKFold, cross_val_score
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier
X_train_sel = X_train_scaled[:, selected_idx]
X_test_sel = X_test_scaled[:, selected_idx]
outer_cv = StratifiedKFold(n_splits=5, shuffle=True, random_state=42)
clf = RandomForestClassifier(n_estimators=100, random_state=42, n_jobs=-1)
cv_scores = cross_val_score(clf, X_train_sel, y_train, cv=outer_cv, scoring='roc_auc')
print(f'Nested CV AUC: {cv_scores.mean():.3f} +/- {cv_scores.std():.3f}')
QC Checkpoint 3:
- AUC >0.7 acceptable, >0.8 good
- Fold variance <0.1 (stable performance)
- Check for overfitting: train AUC should not be >>test AUC
Step 4: Model Interpretation
import shap
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
clf.fit(X_train_sel, y_train)
explainer = shap.TreeExplainer(clf)
shap_values = explainer(X_train_sel)
shap.plots.beeswarm(shap_values, max_display=20, show=False)
plt.tight_layout()
plt.savefig('shap_beeswarm.png', dpi=150, bbox_inches='tight')
plt.close()
import numpy as np
mean_shap = np.abs(shap_values.values).mean(axis=0)
top_shap_idx = np.argsort(mean_shap)[-20:]
QC Checkpoint 4:
- Top 20 SHAP features should have >50% overlap with selected features
- SHAP directions should be biologically plausible
Step 5: Final Validation
from sklearn.metrics import roc_auc_score, classification_report
import numpy as np
y_prob = clf.predict_proba(X_test_sel)[:, 1]
test_auc = roc_auc_score(y_test, y_prob)
print(f'Hold-out test AUC: {test_auc:.3f}')
n_bootstrap = 1000
boot_aucs = []
for i in range(n_bootstrap):
idx = np.random.choice(len(y_test), size=len(y_test), replace=True)
boot_aucs.append(roc_auc_score(y_test[idx], y_prob[idx]))
ci_lower, ci_upper = np.percentile(boot_aucs, [2.5, 97.5])
print(f'95% CI: [{ci_lower:.3f}, {ci_upper:.3f}]')
print(classification_report(y_test, clf.predict(X_test_sel)))
Parameter Recommendations
| Step | Parameter | Recommendation |
|---|
| Split | test_size | 0.2 (standard), 0.3 for small datasets |
| Boruta | max_iter | 100 (sufficient), 200 if tentative features |
| LASSO | n_bootstrap | 100 (quick), 500 for publication |
| LASSO | stability_threshold | 0.6 (standard), 0.8 for strict |
| Nested CV | outer_folds | 5 (standard), 10 for small datasets |
| Nested CV | inner_folds | 3 (sufficient for tuning) |
| RF | n_estimators | 100-500 |
| XGBoost | learning_rate | 0.1 (conservative) |
Troubleshooting
| Issue | Likely Cause | Solution |
|---|
| No features selected | Too strict threshold | Lower stability threshold, increase iterations |
| Too many features (>200) | Noisy data | Add pre-filtering, increase regularization |
| Low CV AUC (<0.6) | No signal, low power | Check data quality, add samples |
| High variance across folds | Small sample size | Use more folds, LOOCV |
| SHAP features differ from selected | Model using different signal | Review feature correlations |
Export Results
import pandas as pd
import joblib
feature_names = X_train.columns[selected_idx].tolist()
pd.DataFrame({'feature': feature_names}).to_csv('biomarker_panel.csv', index=False)
joblib.dump(clf, 'biomarker_classifier.joblib')
joblib.dump(scaler, 'feature_scaler.joblib')
Related Skills
- database-access/geo-data - Public expression cohorts for validation sets
- database-access/sra-data - Pull raw FASTQ for re-quantified validation cohorts
- database-access/uniprot-access - Protein-level features (sequence, GO terms, PTMs) for protein biomarkers
- machine-learning/biomarker-discovery - Detailed feature selection methods
- machine-learning/model-validation - Nested CV implementation details
- machine-learning/omics-classifiers - Classifier options and tuning
- machine-learning/prediction-explanation - SHAP and LIME interpretation
- differential-expression/de-results - Pre-filter with DE genes
- pathway-analysis/go-enrichment - Functional enrichment of biomarkers