critical-care-medicine

name	critical-care-medicine
description	Use when targeting Critical Care Medicine or deciding whether an intensive/critical-care study fits this venue. Encodes the journal's ICU-focused fit, the clinical-evidence and translational bar, reporting-guideline and registration requirements, SCCM house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics. Venue-fit aid only, not clinical advice.

Critical Care Medicine (critical-care-medicine)

Journal positioning

Critical Care Medicine is the flagship journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), publishing clinical and translational research centered on the care of the critically ill across the whole ICU — sepsis, ARDS, resuscitation, shock, multiorgan failure and organ support, and the systems and processes of critical-care delivery. Its defining expectation is a clinically important advance in intensive-care management or critical-illness mechanism that informs how clinicians care for ICU patients, not a narrow single-center series with no outcome relevance or a basic experiment without critical-illness anchoring. Unlike the broader pulmonary/critical-care flagship, Critical Care Medicine is ICU-discipline-focused and spans the whole critically ill patient, not just the lung. This skill is a fit / venue-selection / re-framing aid; it is not clinical or regulatory advice and does not replace the journal's current instructions for authors. Before submitting, re-check the live Critical Care Medicine author instructions.

When to trigger

• The author names Critical Care Medicine for an ICU, sepsis, resuscitation, or organ-support study and wants a fit/framing check.
• A critical-care study must be re-framed around an intensive-care management question or a critical-illness mechanism with outcome relevance.
• The author is choosing between Critical Care Medicine, AJRCCM (broader respiratory + critical care), and The Lancet Respiratory Medicine.
• The author needs the journal's reporting-guideline, registration, and ICU-trial/quality expectations.

Scope & topic fit

• Sepsis and septic shock: resuscitation, antimicrobial timing, hemodynamics, and outcome studies.
• ARDS and acute respiratory failure: ventilation strategy, oxygenation, and rescue therapies in the ICU context.
• Resuscitation and shock: fluids, vasopressors, cardiac arrest, and post-resuscitation care.
• Organ support and multiorgan failure: renal replacement, ECMO, nutrition, and sedation/ delirium management.
• ICU systems, quality, staffing, and process-of-care and outcomes research, including long-term/post-ICU outcomes.
• Translational critical-illness science (immunology, endothelial/coagulation biology) anchored to critically ill patients or relevant models.

Method & evidence bar

• Studies must be adequately powered with prespecified, patient-centered ICU endpoints (mortality, organ-failure-free or ventilator-free days, functional outcome); surrogate physiologic endpoints need justification.
• The applicable reporting guideline and checklist are expected: CONSORT for trials, STROBE for observational work, PRISMA for systematic reviews, ARRIVE for animal studies.
• Trials require prospective registration and the registration number; protocol/SAP are expected, and pragmatic/cluster designs need appropriate analysis.
• Observational ICU analyses must address confounding by indication, immortal-time and selection bias, and missing data; causal language must match the design.
• Translational claims need controls and replication and must anchor to critically ill patients or validated models.
• Effect estimates need confidence intervals and absolute as well as relative measures.

Structure & house style

• SCCM format with a structured abstract and a key-points/clinical-relevance statement; re-check current article types (Clinical Investigation, etc.) and limits on the live guide.
• The introduction frames the ICU clinical gap; the discussion states the management implication and bounds generalizability to ICU practice.
• A CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA flow diagram is expected for the relevant design; animal work reports ARRIVE-aligned detail.
• Tables/figures follow the journal's statistical-reporting standards; a supplement carries the protocol, full statistical methods, and additional analyses.

Official-submission checklist

• Before giving submission-ready advice, read ../../resources/source-basis.md and ../../resources/official-source-map.md; start from the ICMJE/EQUATOR and SCCM anchors, then cite the current Critical Care Medicine page you checked.
• Search the live site for "Critical Care Medicine SCCM instructions for authors" and follow the current version.
• Re-check article types, abstract and key-points format, and word/figure/reference limits.
• Confirm trial registration, the reporting checklist (CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA/ARRIVE), data/code-availability, and protocol/SAP submission.
• Re-check IRB/ethics and consent (including waived/deferred consent for emergency research), animal-care/IACUC approval, ICMJE authorship and conflict-of-interest disclosure, funding, and AI-use disclosure.
• If the live official instructions conflict with this skill, the official instructions win.

Pre-submission self-check

• The study delivers a clinically important ICU-management advance or a critical-illness mechanism with outcome relevance.
• ICU endpoints are prespecified and powered; trials are registered with the number in the manuscript.
• The correct reporting checklist (CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA/ARRIVE) is completed and attached.
• Observational analyses address confounding by indication, immortal-time/selection bias, and missing data.
• Translational claims are anchored to critically ill patients or validated models with controls.
• IRB/consent (incl. deferred consent), IACUC (if animal), ICMJE disclosures, and a data-availability statement are prepared.

Common desk-reject triggers

• Single-center descriptive ICU series with no outcome relevance and limited generalizability.
• Observational analyses with confounding by indication or immortal-time bias and overstated causal claims.
• Surrogate physiologic endpoints presented as clinically definitive without patient outcomes.
• Missing trial registration, protocol, or the required reporting checklist.
• Lung-biology-dominant or purely respiratory-mechanism work better placed in a broader respiratory venue.

Re-routing decision

• Pulmonary biology / respiratory-mechanism dominant over ICU management → american-journal-of-respiratory-and-critical-care-medicine.
• High-impact respiratory/critical-care trial with broad reach → the-lancet-respiratory-medicine.
• Perioperative critical care, sedation, or anesthesia-led ICU work → anesthesiology.
• ICU AKI / renal-replacement centered on nephrology → journal-of-the-american-society-of-nephrology / kidney-international.
• Broad practice-changing critical-care trial → general medicine (jama / NEJM / The Lancet in the natural-science bundle).

Output format

[Fit] High / Medium / Low (one-line reason)
[Target] Critical Care Medicine (SCCM)
[Specialty tags] <sepsis / ARDS / resuscitation / organ support / ICU systems>
[Study design / reporting guideline] <RCT-CONSORT / cohort-STROBE / review-PRISMA / animal-ARRIVE>
[Method/evidence] <power, ICU endpoint, confounding control, registration>
[Top risk] <the single most likely reason for rejection>
[Official items to re-check] <article type / registration / checklist / consent (deferred) / ethics / disclosures>
[Re-route suggestion] <if not a fit, a better-matched venue>