| name | ppsych-submission |
| description | Use when running the final submission preflight for a Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS) manuscript via the ScholarOne/Manuscript Central portal — contribution-type/proposal route, abstract limit, APA formatting, open-science deposits, cover-letter declarations, and suggested reviewers. Final checks; it does not draft content. |
Submission Preflight (ppsych-submission)
When to trigger
- "Submitting soon" — last check before uploading to the PoPS portal
- Unsure which files, declarations, and deposits the portal expects
- Confirming abstract limit, APA format, and the proposal/contribution-type route
- Verifying open-science obligations and the suggested-reviewer requirement
Process facts (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准 — re-confirm on the SAGE/APS author pages)
- Publisher / venue. PoPS is published by SAGE in partnership with APS; it is bimonthly and broad/integrative — distinct from Psychological Science (single studies), Psychological Bulletin (formal meta-analyses), Annual Review of Psychology (invited surveys), and Current Directions (short, non-technical) (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准).
- Portal. Submit via Manuscript Central / ScholarOne at http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/pps (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准).
- Contribution type & proposal. Identify the category — stand-alone (proposal optional), cooperative, or miscellaneous (proposal required). A positive proposal reply is not an acceptance; identical review applies (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准).
- Abstract. No more than 200 words (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准).
- Length. No strict page limit for stand-alone articles (concise preferred); brief reports run 1,000–1,500 words (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准).
- Style. APA style for references, statistics, and exhibits — confirm the current APA edition and any SAGE house deviations (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准).
- Open science. When original data are included they must be in a repository; the cover letter confirms ethical data collection; map deposits to TOP/Open-Practice expectations (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准).
- Suggested reviewers. Provide ≥5 objective reviewers, excluding mentors, colleagues, and collaborators (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准).
Preflight checklist
Article & files
Open science & transparency
Declarations (cover letter / portal)
Volatile re-confirms
Anti-patterns
- Submitting a single empirical study or a routine meta-analysis (out of scope — wrong venue)
- Skipping the required proposal for a cooperative/miscellaneous piece
- An abstract over 200 words, or an empirical-paper abstract on a perspective
- "Data available on request" instead of a repository deposit when original data are included
- Suggesting mentors/collaborators as "objective" reviewers, or naming fewer than five
- Asserting the abstract limit, portal, or data policy from memory rather than the live author pages
Output format
【Contribution type】stand-alone / cooperative / miscellaneous; proposal sent where required? Y/N
【References】complete, accurate, APA? Y/N
【Abstract】≤ 200 words, perspective-style? Y/N
【Length】concise (or brief-report 1,000–1,500w)? Y/N
【Open science】data/protocol deposited + cited; figures reproducible? Y/N · N/A
【Declarations】ethical-collection in cover letter; COI/funding; AI disclosed? Y/N
【Reviewers】≥5 objective, no collaborators? Y/N
【Volatile re-confirms】abstract limit / APA / portal / data policy checked on SAGE-APS pages? Y/N
【Next step】submit at mc.manuscriptcentral.com/pps → ppsych-revision on the decision
Supplementary resources
