Menu
Skills in this repository
SkillsMP has collected 3,969 skills from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Open a skill to review its source and details.
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsShowing 40 of 3,969 collected skills.
Use when presenting results for an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) manuscript — propositions, numerical examples, schematic theory figures, and empirical/experimental tables. Builds exhibits to AEA house norms; it does not derive the…
Use when the identification argument is the bottleneck for an American Economic Review: Insights (AER: Insights) short-format manuscript — causal identification in an empirical design, parameter identification in a structural model, or treatment-effect…
Use when deciding which robustness checks belong in the few in-text words of an American Economic Review: Insights (AER: Insights) short-format manuscript versus the online Supplemental Appendix. Triages checks against the length cap; it does not design the…
Use when building or trimming the exhibits of an American Economic Review: Insights (AER: Insights) short-format manuscript to the hard five-exhibit budget, one page each, no significance asterisks. Designs the minimum exhibit set; it does not run the…
Use when executing and reporting the analysis for a Management Science (INFORMS) manuscript — proving and numerically verifying analytical results, or estimating and validating empirical models (identification, robustness, inference) to the standard of the…
Use when choosing and defending the method for a Management Science (INFORMS) manuscript — selecting an analytical modeling approach (optimization, stochastic, game/economic theory) or an empirical design (econometric identification, lab/field experiment,…
Use when building exhibits for a Management Science (INFORMS) manuscript — propositions and numerical-illustration figures for analytical papers, or result/identification tables and effect plots for empirical papers — keeping notation clean, exhibits…
Use when the causal identification strategy is the bottleneck for a Quarterly Journal of Economics (QJE) manuscript — RCT, staggered DID, IV, RDD, event study. Stress-tests the design to the QJE general-interest bar before tables are drafted.
Use when building the robustness suite and online appendix for a Quarterly Journal of Economics (QJE) manuscript — the extensive checks QJE referees expect, exploiting the journal's no-page-limit norm. Plans and prioritizes robustness; it does not change the…
Use when finalizing the main exhibits of a Quarterly Journal of Economics (QJE) manuscript — making the paper figure-forward, with clean tables and self-contained notes that read well in QJE's single-PDF, author-date format. Designs exhibits; it does not run…
Use when designing or stress-testing an asset-pricing test for a The Journal of Finance (JF) manuscript — factor models, Fama–MacBeth vs. panel, standard-error corrections, out-of-sample discipline. For corporate causal claims use jf-identification.
Use when the causal-identification strategy is the bottleneck for a corporate / empirical The Journal of Finance (JF) manuscript — natural experiments, IV, DID, RDD. Stress-tests the design; for asset-pricing tests use jf-empirical-design.
Use when finalizing tables and figures for a The Journal of Finance (JF) manuscript for the AFA flagship. Enforces accessible, self-contained, general-interest exhibits with Roman-numeral tables, economic-magnitude reporting, and matching Internet Appendix…
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Games and Economic Behavior (GEB) via Elsevier Editorial Manager — Word/LaTeX (elsarticle) source, 250-word abstract, the mandatory conference-version disclosure in the cover letter, and the…
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Journal of Economic Theory (JET) via Elsevier Editorial Manager — editable Word/LaTeX source (no PDF source), 250-word abstract, 1-7 keywords, optional Highlights, author-year proof-stage references,…
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for a Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS) manuscript — Springer Editorial Manager portal, double-anonymized blinding, APA style, the blinded title page, data/code availability, and…
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) manuscript — ScholarOne portal, anonymization for double-blind review, AOM house-style formatting, files, and ethics declarations. Checks readiness to submit; it…
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for a The Review of Economic Studies (REStud) manuscript — double-anonymity, the ~45-page limit, Harvard author-date references, online appendix, the USD submission fee, and the Editorial Express portal.…
Use when deciding which restud-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a The Review of Economic Studies (REStud) manuscript. Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills.
Use when planning or auditing the robustness, sensitivity, and multiple-testing battery for a The Journal of Finance (JF) manuscript. Decides which checks are load-bearing; it does not design the main test.
Use to write the PNAS Nexus abstract — a single self-contained paragraph of up to 250 words, with no headings, quantified and accessible to a broad scientific audience. Distinguishes the abstract (what/how/found, for scientists) from the 50–120-word…
Use to settle PNAS Nexus's open-access decisions — confirm the gold-OA model and the article processing charge (APC), check eligibility for waivers/discounts (low-/middle-income countries, Read & Publish, membership) and funder compliance, and choose the…
Use to choose the PNAS Nexus article type, structure the main text, and hold the page-based length budget — Research Report / Brief Report / Perspective / Review / Registered Report — keep Materials and Methods in the main text, and select the required…
Use when you need to understand the Academy of Management Review (AMR) developmental, multi-round review and interpret a decision letter focused on theoretical novelty and logical soundness. Explains the process and decision types; it does NOT draft the…
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for 《中国行政管理》 — format, anonymity, references, anti-plagiarism, author info, ethics for human-subject / qualitative data, and supplementary files. Points to the online submission system; defers exact numeric…
Source text: Chinese
Use when anticipating editor and reviewer expectations, framing the contribution, and positioning scope for a Review of Educational Research (RER) submission. Aligns the review with how RER is refereed; it does not run the submission preflight…
Use when interpreting the Strategic Management Journal (SMJ) review process and a decision letter, and planning the revision strategy. Explains the process and triages the decision; the actual response letter is drafted in smj-rebuttal.
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for The Yale Law Journal (YLJ) via its own online author portal — track selection, anonymization, word/length caps, Bluebook readiness, and required materials. Final checks; it does not draft content.
Use when preparing the transparency / reproducibility materials for a Public Administration Review (PAR) manuscript. PAR is a signatory of the Center for Open Science TOP Guidelines and has adopted transparency standards (data citation, data sharing via…
Use when positioning a Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory (JPART) manuscript against the public-administration literature so it reads as a theory contribution, not a fresh data point. JPART expects engagement with the specific PA…
Use when deciding which English agriculture / environment / earth-science journal skill to invoke next, comparing fit across the 30-journal agriculture-and-environment roadmap, or routing a manuscript before venue-specific re-framing. Routes by sub-field…
Use to get PNAS Nexus references right — note that PNAS Nexus accepts references in any readable style at submission (unlike flagship PNAS's strict numbered-by-appearance), so the job is internal consistency, completeness, resolvable in-text citations, and…
Use to build PNAS Nexus's Data and Code Availability — mandatory public-repository deposition of all materials, data, code, and protocols upon publication, retention of raw unprocessed images, accession numbers/DOIs, the [dataset] citation tag, and a…
Use to finalize PNAS Nexus display items — count figures and tables against the graphical-element budget, size to journal column widths, set legible fonts, show-the-data with n and defined error bars, scale bars, colorblind-safe palettes, legend structure,…
Use after PNAS Nexus reviews arrive to triage the decision, prioritize experiments, and draft a point-by-point response that is respectful, evidence-led, and honest about limits. Covers the case where reviews were carried over from a PNAS transfer. Do not run…
Use to write the PNAS Nexus Significance Statement — between 50 and 120 words, in plain language for a broad scientific audience, explaining why the work matters. Required for Research Reports and Stage 2 Registered Reports. Distinct from the abstract. One of…
Use to enforce PNAS Nexus's statistics and reproducibility reporting — n and replication, test choice and assumptions, effect sizes with uncertainty, multiple-comparison control, randomization/blinding, sample-size justification, and reproducible code. Also…
Use as the final preflight before submitting to PNAS Nexus — a complete checklist across fit, open access/APC/license, article type & length, Significance Statement, abstract, classification, figures, statistics, data/code, references, and required files.…
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Harvard Law Review (HLR) via HLR's own electronic submission system — manuscript readiness, anonymization, length limits, Bluebook 22nd-edition footnotes, expedite setup, and season timing. Final…
Use when navigating the Journal of Financial Intermediation (JFI) editorial process — the active desk-rejection policy, single-anonymized (single-blind) review with at least one expert referee when sent out, the tightly limited appeal path, and the option to…